Hi everybody,
after discussion with jreznik, tcallawa and pchibon about licensing in
RPMs, I've decided to create a common package for licenses which allow
separate shipping from the sources/binaries.
Currently the developer needs to package each such license for each
(sub)package manually and th
Hi Kevin,
> Not impossible, but we would probibly want it running inside Fedora
> Infrastructure and need to be careful security wise.
That is also a part of our design.
Kind regards,
-- Jan Pacner
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis
Hi Michael,
> Detecting soname bumps and doing real rebuilds
> instead of scratch build should be possible. Koschei could automatically start
> rebuilding dependent packages AFTER you update the library in rawhide.
That's the goal.
> But if
> you want to know what will break before you do the up
Hi Petr,
> The rebuilds run in koji. You cannot get scratch build into koji build
> root. You would need separate koji build target tag for that.
I understood that Koschei does it anyway (to be able to rebuild the
dependency subtree). Either way, it doesn't sound problematic to create
temporary t
Hi Michael,
it sounds like a way how one could automatically handle library so-bumps
in rawhide. Idea discussed with hhorak, jzeleny, pingou and others was
to bump the library package, rebuild the dependency tree depending on
this library and if some of them fail, notify it's maintainer(s) and the
Hi,
that was my mistake. Now both libdbi and libdbi-drivers are in new
version in rawhide.
-- Jan Pacner
On 01/21/2014 09:53 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Looks like yet another unannounced soname bump has occurred in
> Rawhide, this time libdbi. If there was an announcement, I haven't
> no
