Re: equivalent of Debian config-package?

Il gio 31 mag 2018, 13:42 Neal Gompa ha scritto: > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 6:54 AM Dave Love > wrote: > > > > Is there any existing system for rpm like the Debian one > > for building local > > configuration packages? If not, would it be feasible

Re: BIND 9.10.1 beta with seccomp functionality

Il 19/Ago/2014 17:10 "Tomas Hozza" ha scritto: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello. > > ISC is working on new BIND 9.10 release which includes the seccomp > functionality. It can be turned on by configuring BIND before build with > "--enable-seccomp". > > ISC asked me to

Re: FTBFS if "-Werror=format-security" flag is used

On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 07:10:39PM +0100, Brendan Jones wrote: >> >> This is just a pain. Can someone explain to me why this is good? > > If you read the bug description you'll see the link which > answers your question. > > https://fed

Re: Ananconda

On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Phil Dobbin wrote: > Hi, all. > > I was wondering as to why Ananconda has no facility to overwrite a distro > already present on the target machine. I've studied it & apart from > destroying the existing partition with GParted there seems to be no other > way (thi

Re: Expanding the list of "Hardened Packages"

Perhaps is not working because most of the new policy are deployed in enforcing mode and not in permissive ? But permissive not was born exactly for this ? Best 2013/4/23, Kevin Kofler : > Adam Williamson wrote: >> SELinux keeps having bugs *because* they progressively build out the >> policies.

Re: XFS and trim

Please, no flame. One thing on this mailing list that i like it is the near absence of flame. IMHO, one has to accept requests from those who do not follow the mailing, if appropriate and useful. I think this is the case. Just an opinion. Best On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Matej Cepl wrote:

Re: tomcat6 unresponsive maintainer & deprecation

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky < sochotni...@redhat.com> wrote: > Quoting Kevin Fenzi (2013-03-12 15:53:56) > > On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:49:22 +0100 > > Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > > > > > Tomcat6 package in Fedora is old, has several problematic bugs > > > (including 4 sec

Re: formulas-devel list established

On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 22:23:50 +0100 > yersinia wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > > Greetings. > > > > > > I've setup a fedorahosted project: > > > https://fedorahosted.org/formulas/wiki/WikiStart > > >

Re: Rolling release model philosophy (was Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID)))

For microsoft perhaps, but Ubuntu, Debian ? Upgrading from a release to the next is trivial, and in general work well. Sure, probably the update to the core system component is more light, no Usrmove, no systemd, or something like this. And preserving, updating the new configuration based on the pr

Re: OBS Fedora

Sorry for the top posting. Just my 1 cent , i follow only fedora. But the answer could be only: political in first place. But this is the same for every distro, and this is true, in particular, for every distro rpm based for some reason. Every major rpm distro have its buildsystem, its bugtracker

Re: Samba update

On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Bojan Smojver > wrote: > > Anyone knows what's the holdup with the Samba update (CVE-2012-1182)? No > > new builds have been done or queued up recently AFAICT... > > There's a BZ open, I'll look into getting n

Re: selinux versus chcon

Sorry for the top posting. No, chcon is not necessary in your example. Perhaps the advice message is wrong, or it is something historical. Hth 2011/9/19, Fulko Hew : > I've reviewing my buildRPM spec file so that it works in newer distributions > (currently playing with RHEL 5.6), but my question

Re: popularity package context on fedora

2010/5/4 Björn Persson > Thomas Janssen wrote: > > Well, i wouldn't call a software that counts serverside downloads of > > FOSS software and gives based on that downloads/installations, a > > popularity suggestion in packagekit, spyware. > > There's nothing at all that gets sent out of your box.

Re: RPM packaging workshop example

On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > There is a small bug in the example: Corrected. Thanks -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel