On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 3:49 AM Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 1/17/19 6:37 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> > I want to install Notable[0]. As it is not yet packaged for fedora, I
> > tried to install it with the rpm package.
> >
> > --
> > # rpm-ostree
I want to install Notable[0]. As it is not yet packaged for fedora, I tried
to install it with the rpm package.
--
# rpm-ostree install notable-1.1.0.x86_64.rpm
error: Importing package notable: Unsupported path:
/opt/Notable/LICENSE.electron.txt; See
https://github.com/projectatom
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 3:14 PM Michal Schmidt wrote:
> On 1/14/19 1:31 PM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > ##
> > $ cat /etc/os-release
> > NAME=Fedora
> > VERSION="29.20181230.0 (Workstation Edition)"
>
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 1:34 PM Joseph D. Wagner
wrote:
> Do you have a nvidia card?
>
No. Lenovo yoga with Intel
>
>
> Joseph D. Wagner
>
>
>
> *From:* arnaud gaboury
> *Sent:* Monday, January 14, 2019 4:31 AM
> *To:* Development discus
Hello everyone,
##
$ cat /etc/os-release
NAME=Fedora
VERSION="29.20181230.0 (Workstation Edition)"
ID=fedora
VERSION_ID=29
VERSION_CODENAME=""
PLATFORM_ID="platform:f29"
PRETTY_NAME="Fedora 29.20181230.0 (Workstation Edition)"
VARIANT="Workstation Edition"
VARIANT_ID=workstati
On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 4:13 PM Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
>
> On 12/5/18 5:14 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 6:57 PM Dusty Mabe du...@dustymabe.com>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 12/4/18 11:40 AM, Dusty Mabe wrot
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 6:57 PM Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
>
> On 12/4/18 11:40 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
> >
> > I will look at the configs and see if I can figure out where things are
> going wrong.
> >
>
> I think this a a regression is some of the new yaml parsing in pungi. I
> opened a bug
> to see ht
-
$ cat /etc/os-release
NAME=Fedora
VERSION="29.20181129.0 (Workstation Edition)"
ID=fedora
VERSION_ID=29
PLATFORM_ID="platform:f29"
PRETTY_NAME="Fedora 29.20181129.0 (Workstation Edition)"
---
now upgrading:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 1:46 AM, Mukundan Ragavan
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 02/29/2016 05:25 PM, Amit Saha wrote:
> >> SG> Hello, I like to have everything on my system in a package.
> >> So, I SG> looked around and found no recipe or rpm for Rstudio.
> >>
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> On St, 2016-02-17 at 07:29 -0800, Brian C. Lane wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 05:52:45AM +, Christopher wrote:
>> > I just ran into this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1
>> > 309175
>> > It's not a huge deal (and there are
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 08.10.2015 um 21:06 schrieb arnaud gaboury:
>>
>> Downloading from Intel website the parallel studio 2016. There is a
>> folder with all rpm packages and a script to install them. I
>> understand this p
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 10/08/2015 07:10 PM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>> I wrote a .spec file to build a pacakge with many shared
>> librairies installed by Intel parallel studio 2016.
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 8:52 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 08.10.2015 um 20:44 schrieb arnaud gaboury:
>>
>> I must have done some errors in my spec file and I am looking for any
>> hint why my rpm claims these shared libraries when they are installed
>
>
&
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 10/08/2015 11:10 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>> I wrote a .spec file to build a pacakge with many shared librairies
>> installed by Intel parallel studio 2016.
>
> This doesn't belong on Fedora devel, it has
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 10/08/2015 07:10 PM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>> I wrote a .spec file to build a pacakge with many shared
>> librairies installed by Intel parallel studio 2016.
I wrote a .spec file to build a pacakge with many shared librairies
installed by Intel parallel studio 2016.
There is no Fedora package for Intel, but the installation script
install many .rpm packages, and all are correctly listed when running
$ dnf list
Building my package goes fine. I am no le
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 18:09:44 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
>> On 15/09/15 13:58 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>> >I have been working on my first rpmbuild since quite a few days now.
>>
>> As a more gner
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Dave Love wrote:
> arnaud gaboury writes:
>
>> I have been working on my first rpmbuild since quite a few days now.
>>
>> The rpm is intendeed to install R[0] built with Intel MKL libraries
>> and Intel compiler. As a base for the
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:07 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> Also, when will you stop posting your failures at here? I see most of
> failures are caused by yourself.
Ha ha, of course ! It is my mistakes thus why I ask for hints.
Basically, I'd read docs first.
I did read a lot of rpm packages.
Fro
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 7:19 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 15/09/15 18:31 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Michael Schwendt
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 16:47:44 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>>>
>&
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 15/09/15 13:58 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>>
>> I have been working on my first rpmbuild since quite a few days now.
>>
>> The rpm is intendeed to install R[0] built with Intel MKL libraries
>> and
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 16:47:44 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>
>> >> Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files
>> >> ..
>> >>
&g
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 13:58:38 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>
>> Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files
>> ..
>>
>> These last lines
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 1:58 PM, arnaud gaboury
wrote:
> I have been working on my first rpmbuild since quite a few days now.
>
> The rpm is intendeed to install R[0] built with Intel MKL libraries
> and Intel compiler. As a base for the spec file, I used the one from
> Fedora R pa
I have been working on my first rpmbuild since quite a few days now.
The rpm is intendeed to install R[0] built with Intel MKL libraries
and Intel compiler. As a base for the spec file, I used the one from
Fedora R package[1].
I setup the directory structure:
% ls ~/.rpmbuild
BUILD/ BUILDROOT/
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 14/09/15 12:00 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>>
>> I build my app with shared libraries. In my spec file, I source a
>> script which export LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
>> Below is ho
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 2:03 PM, arnaud gaboury
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> On 09/14/2015 09:52 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>>> For some practical reason, I want sysconfdir to be /etc/R, and not the
>>> default /etc
>>
&
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 09/14/2015 09:52 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>> For some practical reason, I want sysconfdir to be /etc/R, and not the
>> default /etc
>
> This will break quite a few RPM macros. Why, exactly, do you want to do
>
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 11:03:13 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>
>> > %build
>> > mkdir %{buildroot}/etc/R
>>
>> I already tried this method, with no sucess. Finally, after a close
>> look at my SPEC
I build my app with shared libraries. In my spec file, I source a
script which export LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
Below is how I proceed in my spec file:
%global _prod_dir /opt/intel/compilers_and_libraries_2016/linux
%global _mklroot_dir %{_prod_dir}/mkl
%global _mkllibp
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 14.09.2015 um 10:15 schrieb arnaud gaboury:
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:04 AM Adam Williamson
>> mailto:adamw...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 09:52 +0
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:04 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 09:52 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> > For some practical reason, I want sysconfdir to be /etc/R, and not
> > the
> > default /etc
> >
> > Here is what I did:
> >
> >
For some practical reason, I want sysconfdir to be /etc/R, and not the
default /etc
Here is what I did:
%build
.
mkdir -p {_builddir}/R-%{version}/etc/R
.
%configure
--sysconfdir=/etc/R
..
make throw me an error:
--sysconfdir=/etc/R: No such file or directory
$ ls {_buildd
On Sep 13, 2015 4:07 PM, "Reindl Harald" wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 13.09.2015 um 16:01 schrieb arnaud gaboury:
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Reindl Harald
wrote:
>>>>
>>>> export CFFLAGS= '-xHost -mavx -fp-model precise'
>
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 13.09.2015 um 15:39 schrieb arnaud gaboury:
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>>>
>>> arnaud gaboury wrote:
>>>
>>>> When declaring a variable value
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> arnaud gaboury wrote:
>
>> When declaring a variable value, I wonder if the any difference/best
>> practice between these methods:
>>
>> export VAR=MyValue
>> %{define} VAR MyValue
>> %{global} VAR
When declaring a variable value, I wonder if the any difference/best
practice between these methods:
export VAR=MyValue
%{define} VAR MyValue
%{global} VAR MyValue
Thank you for hints.
--
google.com/+arnaudgabourygabx
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorap
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Adam Miller
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 12:23 PM, arnaud gaboury
> wrote:
>> It is my first rpm build. I followed this how-to[0].
>>
>> $ rpmdev-setuptree
>> $ cd ~/rpmbuild
>> $ ls
>> BUILD/ BUILDROOT/ RPM
It is my first rpm build. I followed this how-to[0].
$ rpmdev-setuptree
$ cd ~/rpmbuild
$ ls
BUILD/ BUILDROOT/ RPMS/ SOURCES/ SPECS/ SRPMS/
$ rpm -ivh sourcepackage-name*.src.rpm # I use an already exisiting
package as base
$ vim SPEC/MyName.spec
$ $ rpmlint SPEC/MyName.spec
$ $ rpmbuild -ba
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 5:04 PM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Jonathan Underwood
> wrote:
>> I see what you're trying to do is build a package using the intel
>> compiler suite rather than the usual gcc toolchain.
> Exactly. And this is not an
s, cxxflags etc)
Thank you for your help.
>
> On 8 September 2015 at 12:07, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>> I am building a rpm package. For make to success and have the correct
>> env variables, I need to source a few scripts and unset a few
>> variables.
>> rpmbuild do
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 08/09/15 14:11 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Jan Chaloupka wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Arnaud,
>>>
>>> I am assuming all scripts you are referring to are so
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 2:11 PM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Jan Chaloupka wrote:
>> Hi Arnaud,
>>
>> I am assuming all scripts you are referring to are sourced and run in %build
>> section. Can you be more specific which commands are you ru
-qopenmp -parallel
-I/opt/intel/compilers_and_libraries_2016.0.109/linux/mkl/include
761- Fortran 77 compiler: ifort -ip -O3
-opt-mem-layout-trans=3 -xHost -mavx -fp-model precise -DMKL_ILP64
-qopenmp -parallel
-I/opt/intel/compilers_and_libraries_2016.0.109/linux/mkl/include
762-
763-
I am building a rpm package. For make to success and have the correct
env variables, I need to source a few scripts and unset a few
variables.
rpmbuild does not understand the source and unset commands.
How shall I proceed to get the desired variables?
Thank you
--
google.com/+arnaudgabourygab
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 10:04 AM, arnaud gaboury
wrote:
> First try at building a rpm package and as feared, errors are returned.
>
> Fedora 22
>
> I wrote my own .spec file based on this package[0]. My goal is to
> build R using Intel Compiler and MKL. The whole part of
First try at building a rpm package and as feared, errors are returned.
Fedora 22
I wrote my own .spec file based on this package[0]. My goal is to
build R using Intel Compiler and MKL. The whole part of the spec file
is untouched, except for the configure, variables and flag part.
At the begini
47 matches
Mail list logo
