show changelogs script

2016-02-12 Thread Zing
I made small bash script to show the changelogs of potential updates. There used to be yum plugin that did this but I didn't really see anything. warning, the script is a quick hack, it just reaches into the dnf cache after a download only run, must run as root cause i'm lazy, and the changel

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Replace Yum With DNF

2014-06-16 Thread Zing
On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 14:44:10 +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > * package 'dnf-yum-compat-command' is installed by default. It > obsoletes Yum and provides its own /usr/bin/yum, a short Does yum have current developers/maintainers? If so, actually obsoleting yum seems kind of rude to me. If that'

Re: UsrMove feature (was Re: FESCo meeting minutes for 2011-10-24)

2011-10-28 Thread Zing
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 11:47:04 +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote: > Read the rpm snippet on the feature page, please. I just briefly browsed the feature page and the requirement on initramfs piqued me. Maybe I'm wrong, but usrmove would then make fedora systems from now on specifically require the use o

Re: UsrMove feature (was Re: FESCo meeting minutes for 2011-10-24)

2011-10-26 Thread Zing
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:40:41 +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote: > With the compat symlinks, you even have no path problems anymore with > any alien scripts you run. I wouldn't say no path problems. I'm sure you know that symlinks can cause traversal problems (e.g. the ".." doesn't take you where you t

Re: Marking zapped bugs

2010-11-05 Thread Zing
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 09:14:08 +0200, Alexander Kurtakov wrote: >> On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 16:10:17 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote: >> > On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 09:38 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> >> The practical point is that F12 >> >> is about to go EOL which means the bug must be closed... >> > >> >

Re: Marking zapped bugs

2010-11-04 Thread Zing
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 16:10:17 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote: > On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 09:38 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> The practical point is that F12 >> is about to go EOL which means the bug must be closed... > > Why? Obviously it needs to be clear that nothing further should be > expected f

Re: Proposal: fedora-release-rawhide subpackage

2010-01-14 Thread Zing
On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 09:37:20 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Because it won't be on the live media that many of the install from, or > the default groups that would be choosen from the dvd install. Just FYI, since it seems this is happening anyway, I didn't think rawhide was available from an anacon