On Wed, May 1, 2019, 6:15 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 10:04:55PM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 8:50 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 9:47 AM Tomasz Kłoczko <
>
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 8:50 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 9:47 AM Tomasz Kłoczko
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 at 20:09, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > [..]
> >>
> >> The work required to fix packages affected by this disadvantage
> >> (potentially) far outweighs any advantage
Hello,
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On 2017-01-14 06:45, Neal Gompa wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 7:10 AM, Pavel Raiskup
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Friday, January 13, 2017 1:18:34 PM CET Neal Gompa wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Pavel Raiskup
Hello,
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
> Neal Gompa wrote:
>> Because pkgconf supports the full specification, including Provides
>> rules. pkgconfig does not. It's been *years* and they never added
>> support for it. It's even documented to be a stub implementation in
>> p
Hello,
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Hi Neal!
>
> On Saturday, January 14, 2017 9:51:39 AM CET Neal Gompa wrote:
>> > I hope no. Can you be precise here? I'm all for protecting Fedora's
>> > interests.;
>>
>> I strongly believe in Fedora's Foundations[0], which include
Hello,
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 19:35 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> You argue that the change should be mostly painless, but without
>> providing any details: why not rebuild a 10 or 100 or 1000 packages
>> in a mock root with
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 09:51 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> And being afraid of
>> switching to a different and fully compatible implementation of
>> pkg-config just because it's not the implementation we've used for
>> over a decade is co
