Re: Docker base image naming for non-x86_64

2015-06-08 Thread Vincent Batts
On 06/06/15 16:40 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: On Tue, Jun 2, 2015, at 11:02 AM, Adam Miller wrote: Hello all, There was recently a thread on the Fedora ARM mailing list[0] about getting a Fedora ARM image into the official Docker Hub. That discussion lead down the trail of how to best handle

Re: simplestreams json or index.asc for deliverables in the new list-of-deliverables?

2015-05-20 Thread Vincent Batts
On 18/05/15 19:44 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: FESCo Ticket #1427 formalizes the list of deliverables for each Fedora release. Cool. Let's go a step beyond this and make a machine-readable list, at least of image-based deliverables. One approach would

Re: simplestreams json or index.asc for deliverables in the new list-of-deliverables?

2015-05-19 Thread Vincent Batts
On 19/05/15 09:05 -0400, Fabian Deutsch wrote: - Original Message - On Mon, 18.05.15 19:44, Matthew Miller (mat...@fedoraproject.org) wrote: > FESCo Ticket #1427 > formalizes the list of deliverables for each Fedora release. Cool. > > Let's g

Re: Go packaging

2014-10-03 Thread Vincent Batts
- Original Message - > From: "Richard W.M. Jones" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Cc: "Vincent Batts" > Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 3:45:05 AM > Subject: Re: Go packaging > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 0

Re: Go packaging

2014-10-03 Thread Vincent Batts
- Original Message - > From: "Florian Weimer" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 4:37:46 AM > Subject: Re: Go packaging > > On 09/29/2014 08:54 PM, Haïkel wrote: > > Currently, there is *no* golang packaging guidelines approved, so we > > shouldn't h

Re: Go packaging

2014-10-03 Thread Vincent Batts
- Original Message - > From: "Haïkel" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 10:56:11 AM > Subject: Re: Go packaging > > 2014-09-30 16:20 GMT+02:00 Richard W.M. Jones : > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:19:01AM +0200, Haïkel wrote: > >> @R

Re: Go packaging

2014-10-02 Thread Vincent Batts
On 30/09/14 08:46 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: How does gccgo affect the packaging of libraries? The libraries may have support for one or more versions of the go API, or exclusively one version. Since the gccgo support is usually an API version or so behind, this compatibility would need t

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 26 September 2014 15:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting

2014-09-30 Thread Vincent Batts
On 30/09/14 12:40 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: On Tue, Sep 30, 2014, at 11:55 AM, Václav Pavlín wrote: Tianon also mentioned future feature which would support signed images - we would probably want to produce such signed image by ourselves, not just give Docker rootfs and let them sign it. Ho

Re: Go packaging

2014-09-29 Thread Vincent Batts
(resending, as i got a bounce from the list) On 29/09/14 20:54 +0200, Haïkel wrote: Currently, there is *no* golang packaging guidelines approved, so we shouldn't have accepted golang packages in the first place. https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/382 The most urgent issue is to complete the c

Re: Go packaging

2014-09-29 Thread Vincent Batts
(Resending as i got a bounce from the list) On 29/09/14 11:04 -0700, Richard Henderson wrote: I'm working on enabling Go on systems without golang support, but for which the gccgo compiler works. But in order for this to work, there needs to be some amount of coordination with the regular golan