Re: EXTERNAL: Re: hundred percent cpu load

On 20-08-14 09:14:51, Wells, Roger K. via devel wrote: On 8/14/20 8:45 AM, Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote: So, what is kernel doing? what does your system log say? type 'dmesg' or 'journalctl -e' and look at the end of the data. The following repeats at the end of journalctl: In the last

Re: A few questions about a package update / policy questions / GCC 9 error

On 20-06-10 14:22:53, Simo Sorce wrote: On Wed, 2020-06-10 at 14:16 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Wed, 2020-06-10 at 20:01 +0200, Dan Čermák wrote: > > "Nathanael D. Noblet" writes: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I maintain beanstalkd which is a message server of sorts. It recently > > > relea

Re: Supporting hibernation in Workstation ed., draft 1

On 20-05-30 21:02:11, Chris Murphy wrote: ... Full disk encryption doesn't adequately secure the hibernation image either. Authenticated encryption (signing as well as encryption) is needed to verify the image hasn't been tampered. What can an attacker do other than corrupt the data? It is en

Re: Slow boot on F32 Workstation

On 20-03-21 08:45:09, Andreas Tunek wrote: I sidegraded my rawhide install to F32 a couple of weeks ago and from the start I noticed that booting F32 was really slow. I assumed this was some kind of bug or some devel stuff and would get solved. However, I still have the problem and I wonder

Re: Debates/back and forths

On 19-08-28 07:03:00, Danny Lee wrote: Hi all, I'm new to the devel list and fedora in general, but i was wondering if these kind of back and forths between a few people is a frequent occurrence.  I came to Fedora to volunteer what little spare time I have to help the Fedora project in some litt

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

On 19-08-28 01:03:51, Chris Murphy wrote: On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 10:26 PM Christopher wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 9:27 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > > The Workstation technical specification document says in part: > > Where is the full technical specification document, so one can read

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

On 19-08-27 19:58:15, Chris Murphy wrote: ... I definitely do not want to pester developers, or make their day to day life difficult. If there's no satisfactory GUI right now to manage it, it's difficult to even experiment with different policies. The original firewalld proposal considered the g

Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

On 18-11-18 16:29:45, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: I'm not for or against a longer Fedora lifecycle, but I think we need a stronger statement of what the problem is we're trying to address. From your email: On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 06:36:38PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > But there are some good c

Re: hibernation — does it work for you?

On 18-10-03 11:38:20, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: ... If you perform hibernation (systemctl hibernate, or the equivalent through the GUI), does _your_ system suspend and resume correctly? ... Yes. Acer Aspire E 15 (Aspire ES1-512-P9GT) For several kernels it wouldn't power off after

Re: What does 141 mean?

On 18-09-16 17:53:08, Björn Persson wrote: I have a Kerberos authentication problem. On one computer running Fedora 27, I run kinit to authenticate to the Fedora servers. After I enter my passphrase, kinit returns exit status 141. Then I run "fedpkg build", and get these error messages: Kerbero

F28 balsa email client can't send email

I just upgraded from F26 to F28. The balsa email client is not able to send mail through my server because it doesn't try to authenticate. This is probably because it doesn't STARTTLS, likely because of incompatibility between libesmtp (which balsa uses to send mail) and openssl 1.1, which result

Re: Re: Broken system upgrade due to rich dependencies

On 18-03-07 14:14:38, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le mercredi 07 mars 2018 à 12:18 -0500, Josh Boyer a écrit : > On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 12:11 PM, Nicolas Mailhot > wrote: > > Le mercredi 07 mars 2018 à 11:31 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen a écrit > > : > > > > > > I don't know if this is useful but i

Re: Need help debugging hedgewars

On 17-12-17 14:33:43, John Reiser wrote: ... At this point I suggest to file a bugzilla report against the compiler for not keeping %rsp 16-byte aligned. Include the traceback and the register info from the gdb session at SIGSEGV, and the identities (.so name, build-id, .rpm name) of the shared

Re: Bug 921430 - Error updating SMART data: sk_disk_smart_status: Input/output error (udisks-error-quark, 0)

On 17-09-14 10:01:21, Przemek Klosowski wrote: On 09/13/2017 09:43 PM, Tony Nelson wrote: For some reason, `dnf list libatasmart` says "Error: No matching Packages to list", but `rpm -q libatasmart` returns the installed version.  I've done `dnf clean all` twice, installed the u

Re: Bug 921430 - Error updating SMART data: sk_disk_smart_status: Input/output error (udisks-error-quark, 0)

On 17-09-13 14:10:06, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On 09/09/2017 09:48 AM, Tony Nelson wrote: > Could someone apply the patch in this bug[1], languishing since 2013? > According to "freedesktop.org Bug 61998 - Fails to read status from > WD raptors"[2] the patch is in Debian/Ubuntu. 

Bug 921430 - Error updating SMART data: sk_disk_smart_status: Input/output error (udisks-error-quark, 0)

Could someone apply the patch in this bug[1], languishing since 2013? According to "freedesktop.org Bug 61998 - Fails to read status from WD raptors"[2] the patch is in Debian/Ubuntu. Lennart Poettering did the last upstream[3] commit 7 years ago, but seems to be busy now. [1]: https://bugzilla.

Re: ssl is not being compiled on dillo on F26

On 17-09-07 09:47:36, Globe Trotter wrote: Hello, I posted this on the F26 mailing list but the issue may be deeper requiring some more knowledge from the developers so I thought that I would also put it here. There is a bug report on this here:  Bug 1470354 – dillo appears to not have been

Re: PolicyKit-authentication-agents in Fedora

On 10-04-08 14:13:01, Christoph Wickert wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 08.04.2010, 13:37 -0400 schrieb Bill Nottingham: > > Christoph Wickert (christoph.wick...@googlemail.com) said: ... > > > 3. lxpolkit will be pulled in anyway due to the shortest > > > name. > > > > That's not a use

Re: Provide more testing feedback (was: Re: Refining the update queues/process)

On 10-03-05 17:00:12, Till Maas wrote: ... > But it seems that os.getlogin() is too smart for this purposes, e.g. > for me it always uses the username that started X, even if I "su -" > or "sudo -i" into another account. The Python docs[1] suggest using the environment variable LOGNAME. [1]

Re: FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

On 10-03-01 15:06:21, Josh Stone wrote: > On 03/01/2010 11:46 AM, Seth Vidal wrote: ... > > yum history undo works pretty well. Not flawless, to be sure - but > > it's not bad for the simple-ish cases. ... > But for rolling back an update, yum requires that the old package is > still available.

Re: FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

On 10-02-26 11:07:34, Michael Cronenworth wrote: ... > Yes, this functionality is available in bodhi-client and I use it > myself, but isn't it safe to say there are many Fedora users that > have no idea what bodhi-client is or even admin.fp.o? ... The bodhi-client package could really use a r

Re: Final (hopefully) privilege escalation policy draft

On 10-02-10 15:48:39, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi, all. So the privilege escalation policy went to FESco, who > suggested some minor tweaks and a final run-by the mailing lists > before it gets approved. > > I have now adjusted the draft - > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/ > Draft_F

Re: Fw: Improving metrics gathering

On 10-02-04 11:24:47, Matt Domsch wrote: ... > ... but it's highly likely there are 1000-2000 machines behind > a NAT making those requests. > > [snip] > > To this end, I would like to see yum enhanced to provide information > which we can use to more accurately count the number of installed >

Re: [RFC PATCH] use sulogin in single-user mode

On 10-01-22 13:29:11, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 13:15:04 -0500, > Tony Nelson wrote: > > > > Put SELinux into Permissive mode for single-user mode? Or just > > print a suggestion to do that? (I'd think that SELinux would > > normally

Re: sysconfig ifcfg-* support for running custom post-up scripts per interface?

On 10-01-22 11:37:51, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Richard Zidlicky (r...@linux-m68k.org) said: > > > .. just wondering why it's under /sbin and not under > > > /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ > > > > > > It doesn't feel very good to add custom configuration under > > > /sbin. > > > > same opinion

Re: [RFC PATCH] use sulogin in single-user mode

On 10-01-21 12:21:45, Bill Nottingham wrote: > We have an existing bug where if you're in single-user mode, and > SELinux is active, various commands don't print to the console. > The root of this is the single-user shell isn't running in the > right SELinux context, as there's nothing to distingui

Re: how to speed up mock?

On 10-01-18 11:34:44, Ville Skyttä wrote: ... > So instead of modifying specfiles, one can do something like this in > /etc/mock/site-defaults.cfg: > > config_opts['macros']['%_smp_mflags'] = '-j3' Unless `rpmbuild --showrc` shows a bad definition for _smp_mflags, you're probably better off let

Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers

On 10-01-17 12:32:17, Mail Lists wrote: > On 01/17/2010 11:57 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > Am Sonntag, den 17.01.2010, 15:53 +0100 schrieb Jiri Moskovcak: > >> On 01/16/2010 04:01 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > >> > >> I'm open to any ideas how to improve this. > > > Someone else asked th