- Original Message -
> On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 11:58:07 -0400 (EDT), Tomas Mlcoch wrote:
>
> > RPM itself expects epoch to be number:
> > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/blob/140744377b019e0de81d76d0931c32228d2ed57e/lib/rpmvercmp.c#L124-L143
> >
>
- Original Message -
> On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 04:12:20 -0400 (EDT), Tomas Mlcoch wrote:
>
> > > On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 13:15:02 +, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > >
> > > > We discussed with Jan Silhan yesterday. It looks like something broken
> > >
- Original Message -
> On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 13:15:02 +, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>
> > We discussed with Jan Silhan yesterday. It looks like something broken in
> > createrepo/createrepo_c in F22. So it's not dnf/yum/hawkey/libsolv issue.
> >
> > LOG: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.or
> How feasible would it be to keep the listings in primary.xml and
> filelists.xml sorted by package name and arch? Doing so could open the door
> to simple and efficient diffs of repository metadata.
Createrepo_c [1] keeps packages sorted by filename [2] by default.
Sorting based on filenames was
Hi poma,
the short answer is no.
The idea (to have deltas between two repodata) and purpose (be able to gen and
apply such deltas) is the same, but the used techniques and ideas are different.
Few notes about design could be found on wiki of the project [1].
In few bullets:
* My deltarepo wor
- Original Message -
>
>
> Am 06.01.2014 14:06, schrieb Vít Ondruch:
> > Also, I'd like to point out that "yum/dnf remove" by default shows what it
> > is going to do and you have to
> > explicitly confirm the action, isn't it enough? How much protection do you
> > need?
>
> to say it
Hello everyone,
my name is Tomas Mlcoch. I've just submitted my first package review request
for createrepo_c (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823811). The
package is a C implementation of the original createrepo tool. I'm a student at
Brno University of Technology and an
