Hello everyone,
This is a follow-up email for some "coffee discussions" we had at flock a few
weeks ago. Sorry for the delay!
The Fedora community contains a lot of university students, many of us
packaging tools for their courses and acting as first-level Linux support for
the local student comm
Hello,
I do not think it would be good for apps.fp.o to simply disappear: although
outdated, it does a pretty good job improving human-discoverability of our
services. I understand that longtime or active contributors are not really
affected but I believe the index to be helpful for newcomers (as
Hello,
I'm interested as well!
> As a side note, a taiga board was noted in the sway bug discussion;
> as I have recently found out, the Fedora one is invite only – is there
> anyone with access to invite others, if there is interest?
There is an ongoing effort to make taiga a first-class citize
Hello,
Does anyone here know how to contact mbaldessari? I can't get him to answer on
RHBZ#1640405 [0].
Output of `fedora_active_user.py`:
```
Last login in FAS:
mbaldessari 2018-06-01
Last action on koji:
Tue, 04 Dec 2018 package list entry revoked: beets in trashcan by oscar
Last package
> We have had a long discussion about hibernate (suspend to disk)
> being unreliable. But there seems to be no hard data. Let's gather
> some!
I might have missed something, but can you link me the "long discussion"? Do we
have a page on the subject somewhere on the wiki?
> If you perform hibern
Hello,
Peter Lemenkov [0] is an active packager (he submitted a new erlang
build to bodhi an hour ago) but I was unable to contact him for the last
two months.
I first "encountered" him when he used his rights as provenpackager to
merge some PRs on the elixir package, without thoughts for the
LICENSE
%doc README.md
%{_bindir}/%{name}
%{python3_sitelib}/*
%{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1*
%changelog
* Mon Apr 30 2018 Timothée Floure - 1.0.0-1
- Let there be package
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@list
Hello,
Let's say I want to package a program depending on libraries which are
not (yet) part of Fedora. Is the following procedure correct ?
1) Submit a review for the original package, and a review for each
dependency. Mention into the reviews how they are linked to the original
submission.
2)
ers (running debian everywhere).
Well... nice to meet you ? :)
Best Regards,
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477567
[2] probably due to the lack of policy
--
Timothée Floure
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_
