Re: Inactive packagers removed from the packager group

On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 5:02 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Hi all, > > Today, 2024-05-16, we have removed inactive packagers > from the packager group. > > This is in accordance with the FESCo policy on inactive packagers: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_inactive_packagers/ I

perl-Unix-Statgrab license correction

perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.112-18.fc39 will correct the license from (LGPL-2.1-or-later) to (LGPL-2.1-or-later AND (GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0-Perl)) https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=125519 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.or

Re: Self Introduction: Dorinda Bassey

On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 4:49 AM Felipe Borges wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 1:21 PM Dorinda Bassey wrote: > > > > Hi Everyone, > > > > My name is Dorinda and I am an Associate software Engineer at Red Hat, > > I'm passionate about software development, contributing to the growth of > communit

Retired perl-File-Find-Rule-Age

This package has not seen any attention upstream for 7 years and keeps having random FTBFS due to the tests. As nothing depends on this and I no longer need it in my own workflow, let us send it out to pasture. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1399506 ___

[EPEL-devel] Re: fop for epel 8

ckager and have supported multiple packages in epel-6. So my first inclination was not to file a bug for someone else to do the work. But agreed that the process should be followed. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1819818 > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 9:41 PM Tim Orling wrote: > >

Re: [atomic-devel] Starting a Container SIG

On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 2:42 PM Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > On 07/25/2018 01:09 PM, Clement Verna wrote: > > > > Please Reply if you're interested with helping out making the > > Container story great in Fedora. If there is a good response, I will > > create a Container SIG wiki page, and I guess we

Re: Your package doesn't build with Python 3.7

poses of rawhide with > python 3.7 . Please and thanks > > Sent from my Android > Em 06/07/2018 9:55 da tarde, Tim Orling escreveu: > > Fixed pystatgrab. > python3.7 on copr worked fine for me, with your suggestion of adding the > rawhide repo > > On Mon, Jul 2,

Re: Your package doesn't build with Python 3.7

Fixed pystatgrab. python3.7 on copr worked fine for me, with your suggestion of adding the rawhide repo On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 12:38 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 2.7.2018 02:54, Sérgio Basto wrote: > >> On Mon, 2018-07-02 at 01:37 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> >>> On 2.7.2018 01:20, Sérgio Basto

Re: Your package requires Python 3.6, rebuild it!

Fixed pystatgrab On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 4:10 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 09:58:15PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 4.7.2018 21:51, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > >since 2018-07-02 14:28 [1] we don't have compose this mean build root > > >on co

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 7:08 AM, Jan Rybar wrote: > done: procps-ng, psmisc, psacct > > > On 02/18/2018 06:09 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc >> and >> gcc-c++ in buildro

Re: dotnet on Fedora

FYI, I'm quite involved with upstream IronPython [0] and plan to eventually package IronPython [1] (and ironpython3 [2] when it is ready) for Fedora. Also, come join us if you are interested [3]. Cheers. Tim "moto-timo" FAS: ttorling [0]: http://ironpython.net [1]: https://github.com/IronLanguag

Re: [POC-change] Fedora packages point of contact updates

Looking at the upstream [0], it says "An obsolete library. Don't use it in new projects." So we should probably decide what to do with it. I would be willing to pick it up, but since it won't see any new development according to upstream, we should "do the right thing". [0]: https://github.com/a

Re: Injecting perl-devel and perl-generators build-requires

Thank you for doing all this work, Petr. I, for one, really appreciate it. I hope others feel the same (whether or not they agree with the Built Root change itself). Cheers. --Tim On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 6:09 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > Hello, > > per Build Root Without Perl Fedora 25 change >

Re: Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-04-15)

> On Apr 14, 2016, at 4:16 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo > meeting Friday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. > > To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto > > or

pystatgrab: license change GPLv2+ -> LGPLv2+

Heads up that v0.6 coming to Rawhide has a license change from GPLv2+ to LGPLv2+. See https://github.com/i-scream/pystatgrab/commit/c88af8cd35712e4fec035637f4c8314b27eec3d4 Regards, --Tim Orling (Intel) FAS: ttorling irc: moto-timo -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

I am also interested in maintaining or co-maintaining: rpms/bitbake -- Build tool executing tasks and managing metadata ( master f23 f22 ) --Tim -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

I have an interest in either taking over or co-maintaining: rpms/bwm-ng -- Bandwidth Monitor NG ( master f23 f22 epel7 el6 ) rpms/libstatgrab -- A library that provides cross platform access to statistics of the system ( master f23 f22 epel7 el6 ) I'll have to digest the rest of the list to see if

koji task vs. build

I would like to build a package on koji to make available for a bodhi override, but -- since I am not yet sponsored -- I suspect that I do not have the proper permissions? All my koji builds seem to be tasks... Otherwise, I am missing something in the syntax and have not found the right example/d