Re: Searching a new home for my packages

2020-08-31 Thread Thomas Spura
Am Mo., 31. Aug. 2020 um 15:29 Uhr schrieb Nikola Forró : > On Thu, 2020-07-16 at 15:37 +0200, Nikola Forró wrote: > > On Sat, 2020-06-13 at 13:54 +0200, Thomas Spura wrote: > > > Any takers for: > > > - *python-mglob* and/or *python-minimock *(instead of retiring it?

Re: Searching a new home for my packages

2020-06-14 Thread Thomas Spura
Am So., 14. Juni 2020 um 09:08 Uhr schrieb Remi Collet < fed...@famillecollet.com>: > Hi, > > Le 12/06/2020 à 21:37, Thomas Spura a écrit : > > - php-zmq > > I can take this one. > Thanks, done! Best Thomas -- Fedora: https://fedor

Re: Searching a new home for my packages

2020-06-13 Thread Thomas Spura
Am Fr., 12. Juni 2020 um 23:54 Uhr schrieb Miro Hrončok : > > and hope I didn't forget one, if so, please let me know > > I found python-mglob python-minimock python-zmq scipy zeromq Thank you! mglob and minimock does not seem in use anymore, and I asked here for maintainers or to simply orphan

Re: Searching a new home for my packages

2020-06-13 Thread Thomas Spura
Am Fr., 12. Juni 2020 um 23:44 Uhr schrieb Elliott Sales de Andrade < quantum.anal...@gmail.com>: > On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 at 17:39, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > On 12. 06. 20 21:37, Thomas Spura wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > unfortunately, I don&

Searching a new home for my packages

2020-06-12 Thread Thomas Spura
Hi all, unfortunately, I don't find much time anymore to look for my packages .. Due to that, I would like to step down as the primary maintainer and am searching for a new home for my packages! On most of them, I am co-maintainer and the following are the ones, where I am maintainer (and hope I d

Orphaning python-mglob/python-minimock

2020-06-12 Thread Thomas Spura
Hi all, I would like to orphan these two packages, because as far as I know, nothing requires it currently. I used to package both for ipython dependencies, but they don't seem to be needed anymore. *python-minimock:* Seems not in use anymore: - dnf repoquery --whatrequires python3-minimock / "py

Re: Soon retirement of zeromq2 and zeromq3

2016-11-30 Thread Thomas Spura
Petr Pisar schrieb am Mo., 14. Nov. 2016 um 10:32 Uhr: > On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 10:40:43AM +0000, Thomas Spura wrote: > > The current dependencies are: > > # dnf repoquery --whatrequires zeromq2 --alldeps > > perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-0:1.09-7.fc23.x86_64 > > perl-Z

Soon retirement of zeromq2 and zeromq3

2016-11-13 Thread Thomas Spura
Hi all, zeromq2 and zeromq3 were additional/compat packages that made it possible to ship multiple versions of zeromq (namely the old versions 2 and 3). These days, they don't get any bugfixes anymore and the version 4 should be used were possible. There should have been enough time to port all de

Re: ipython 4 and Jupyter

2016-04-18 Thread Thomas Spura
Jonathan Underwood schrieb am Mo., 18. Apr. 2016 um 12:04 Uhr: > On 18 April 2016 at 08:06, Thomas Spura wrote: > > Any help on reviewing new packages for ipython/jupyter and > (co-)maintaining > > the ipython stack is welcome. Are there any volunteers? :) > > > Am ha

Re: ipython 4 and Jupyter

2016-04-18 Thread Thomas Spura
Philippe Makowski schrieb am So., 17. Apr. 2016 um 19:29 Uhr: > Hi, > > just in case, I started to package ipython 4 and Jupyter in Mageia.. > my progress is there https://wiki.mageia.org/en/User:Philippem > > may be it could help for Fedora. > Thank you for your effort. It is of help to see whi

Re: libsodium soname bump in rawhide/F24

2016-03-07 Thread Thomas Spura
Remi Collet schrieb am Mo., 7. März 2016, 16:11: > Le 07/03/2016 12:34, Remi Collet a écrit : > > Hi > > > > I'm upgrading libsodium from 1.0.5 (soname 13) to 1.0.8 (soname 18) > > > > I will also rebuild dependent packages: > > > > - fastd > > - usbguard > > - zeromq > and php-pecl-libsodium > >

Re: Python naming guidelines clarification

2016-01-25 Thread Thomas Spura
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek schrieb am Do., 21. Jan. 2016 um 16:50 Uhr: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 02:36:00PM +0100, Jan Včelák wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Robert Kuska wrote: > > >> And what is the best current practice if the library contains some > > >> utilities. Should the ut

Re: display state of package generation on KOJI

2015-10-27 Thread Thomas Spura
Joachim Backes schrieb am Di., 27. Okt. 2015 um 07:46 Uhr: > Hi developers, > > sometimes I'm searching for new packages on KOJI, for example for new > kernels, but I see only a "Finished" column (beside others) on the > specific website. It would be helpful if the "Finished" column could > displ

Re: Orphaned packages available for new point of contact

2015-09-13 Thread Thomas Spura
Kalev Lember schrieb am So., 13. Sep. 2015 um 13:37 Uhr: > On 09/09/2015 10:10 PM, Thomas Spura wrote: > > I retired ScientificPython as it does require an older numpy and doesn't > > build anytime soon with the current numpy and will be FTBFS for a longer > > time [1].

Re: Orphaned packages available for new point of contact

2015-09-10 Thread Thomas Spura
Matěj Cepl schrieb am Do., 10. Sep. 2015 um 12:56 Uhr: > On 2015-09-10, 09:24 GMT, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 11:16 +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote: > >> On 2015-09-09, 19:37 GMT, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> > pytz > >> > python-dateutil > >> > >> I see these two as too important to let

Re: Orphaned packages available for new point of contact

2015-09-09 Thread Thomas Spura
Jon Ciesla schrieb am Mi., 9. Sep. 2015 um 22:06 Uhr: > > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> Greetings. > > >> >> I have orphaned packages that formerly had a point of contact of >> jspaleta. >> >> > Bummer. :( > Indeed... > I took gpodder. I've done some work on some

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)

2015-07-29 Thread Thomas Spura
Orion Poplawski schrieb am Di., 28. Juli 2015 um 01:31 Uhr: > On 07/27/2015 12:15 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > On 07/27/2015 01:51 AM, Thomas Spura wrote: > >> mailto:opensou...@till.name>> schrieb am Mo., > 27. Juli > >> 2015 um 09:19 Uhr: > >>

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)

2015-07-27 Thread Thomas Spura
schrieb am Mo., 27. Juli 2015 um 09:19 Uhr: > The following packages did not build for two releases and will be > retired before the Alpha Freeze, unless someone takes care of them. If you > know > for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper > reason: > https://fed

Re: [Fedora-packaging] build failure - Failed to create the file ./: Is a directory

2015-06-25 Thread Thomas Spura
David Timms schrieb am Do., 25. Juni 2015 um 14:04 Uhr: > trying on -devel On 25/06/15 02:06, David Timms wrote: > > I haven't seen this one before. I'm fixing up my first mistake which was > > that adding the new source file to look-aside dropped the > > audacity-manual zip entry from sources. >

Heads up: soname bump of zeromq in rawhide

2015-06-21 Thread Thomas Spura
I plan to build zeromq-4.1.2 in rawhide later this week which bumps the soname. I'll also rebuild the dependencies of it: # dnf repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide --whatrequires "libzmq.so.4()(64bit)" Last metadata expiration check performed 0:19:12 ago on Sun Jun 21 22:58:01 2015. air

Re: Review swap

2014-12-02 Thread Thomas Spura
Jerry James schrieb am Mon Dec 01 2014 at 9:12:13 PM: > CVC4 has a new version with a new dependency. How about yet another > review swap, this time for abc: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169492 > > Let me know what I can review in exchange. Thanks, > Taken. Could you revie

Re: [zeromq] update to version 4 in rawhide

2014-11-14 Thread Thomas Spura
Petr Pisar schrieb am Fri Nov 14 2014 at 2:46:02 PM: > On 2014-11-14, Thomas Spura wrote: > > I'll update the zeromq package to version 4 next week in rawhide, which > > will break all existing packages that depend on the current zeromq > package > > as there ha

[zeromq] update to version 4 in rawhide

2014-11-14 Thread Thomas Spura
Dear zeromq users, I'll update the zeromq package to version 4 next week in rawhide, which will break all existing packages that depend on the current zeromq package as there have been quite some changes [1]. It is recommend to upgrade to version 4, yet given the list of packages, it might take s

Re: update of ipython in rawhide

2014-05-29 Thread Thomas Spura
2014-05-29 18:04 GMT+02:00 Kalev Lember : > On 05/23/2014 11:01 PM, Thomas Spura wrote: >> Dear maintainers of dependent packages of ipython, >> >> I will update python-ipython in rawhide next week on Friday to version 2.1.0. >> This will be shortly before the mass

update of ipython in rawhide

2014-05-23 Thread Thomas Spura
Dear maintainers of dependent packages of ipython, I will update python-ipython in rawhide next week on Friday to version 2.1.0. This will be shortly before the mass rebuilt on 6/6 [2]. A scratch built can be found at [1]. Please check if a dependent package is still working fine. A lot has happ

update of python-tornado in rawhide

2014-05-22 Thread Thomas Spura
Dear maintainers of dependent packages of python-tornado, I will update python-tornado in rawhide next week on Thuesday to version 3.2.1. This will be shortly before the mass rebuilt on 6/6 [3]. The backward incompatible changes of version 3 series can be found at: http://www.tornadoweb.org/en/sta

Re: orphaning packages

2013-12-01 Thread Thomas Spura
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > What do you need it for? Is your dependency still working with 3.1.1? >> > pronteserve from printrun > httpretty > octoprint > > None of those is in Fedora right now. > > Feel free to take the package, I'll investigate if 3.1.1 is ok or not. >

Re: orphaning packages

2013-12-01 Thread Thomas Spura
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Dne 30.11.2013 22:26, Ionuț Arțăriși napsal(a): > > python-tornado -- Scalable, non-blocking web server and tools >> > > I need that one so I can take it. Hmm, sorry for being faster ;) I didn't see this mail, but only the orphaning mails,

Orphaning gpointing-device-settings

2013-01-25 Thread Thomas Spura
Hi, the package gpointing-device-settings is searching for a new maintainer in all branches. I just orphaned it as I don't use it any more and it doesn't preserve the settings from one reboot to another and don't know how to fix this properly [1]. A partial solution might be at [2] Furthermore up

Re: Mate-Desktop

2012-08-22 Thread Thomas Spura
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >> "Ri" == Rave it writes: > > Ri> For your information. I stoped working for the Mate-Desktop project > Ri> for f18 because for me it is imposssible to to work together with > Ri> Dan Mashal. One of the reason for my decision is th

Orphaning of blazeblogger

2012-08-12 Thread Thomas Spura
Hi, I just orphaned blazeblogger [1] in rawhide as I just switched to hyde [2]. If there are perl enthusiasts, who like to take it, feel free to do so and just let me know, if you also want other (non-rawhide) branches. Greetings, Tom [1] http://blaze.blackened.cz/ [2] https://github.com/h

Re: changelog in spec file, was Re: Stop the git abuse

2012-05-24 Thread Thomas Spura
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: >  * If a git commit is tagged in a specific way, omit from rpm changelog. >   What I mean by "tagged" is a git tag, in form of let's say >   "silentXXX". Where XXX has to be unique, but that can be figured out by >   fedpkg easily. I'

Re: Review swaps?

2012-04-17 Thread Thomas Spura
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > I've got two reviews I need completed which are dependencies for > another package I'd like to submit. > > Pivy > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458975 Please open a new review request so $reporter == ${submitter of review reques

Re: Xfce 4.10pre1 in rawhide

2012-04-03 Thread Thomas Spura
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Gilboa Davara wrote: > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: >> Hence my reply. > > *Sigh* Then better look here: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/xfce/2012-April/001082.html :) Greetings, Tom -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedorapr

Re: Broken dependencies: parcellite

2012-03-21 Thread Thomas Spura
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 21.03.2012, 12:52 + schrieb > build...@fedoraproject.org: >> >> parcellite has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: >> On i386: >>       parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) >>  

Re: Chromium

2012-03-21 Thread Thomas Spura
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:02 AM, Camilo Mesias wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Richard W.M. Jones > wrote: >> which (right now) has precisely one other hit on Google. > > If you search for the demangled symbol, there are more references: > > v8::internal::I18NExtension::get()

Re: How to determine FAS from BZ email?

2012-02-23 Thread Thomas Spura
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Jamie Nguyen wrote: > Thomas Spura wrote: >> 2012/2/23 Miroslav Suchý : >>> But I find incredibly hard to find relation between bugzilla email and FAS >>> account. >>> How do you do this check? >> >> Show all usere

Re: How to determine FAS from BZ email?

2012-02-23 Thread Thomas Spura
2012/2/23 Miroslav Suchý : > But I find incredibly hard to find relation between bugzilla email and FAS > account. > How do you do this check? Show all useres in the cla_signed group [3] and search for the mail address. When it's not there it may be overritten in [4]. When it's not there either, t

Re: [python] pep 394 is accepted

2012-02-17 Thread Thomas Spura
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Neal Becker wrote: > Thomas Spura wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Neal Becker wrote: >>> acceptance of pep 394 should be of interest to python users >> >> Why? >> We already do that on fedora so nothing will

Re: [python] pep 394 is accepted

2012-02-17 Thread Thomas Spura
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Neal Becker wrote: > acceptance of pep 394 should be of interest to python users Why? We already do that on fedora so nothing will change. (Right now we have a symlink from python2 -> python and not the other way around like in the pep, but the result for a user i

Re: Should we be using Bohdi yet for branched?

2012-02-12 Thread Thomas Spura
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > It doesn't look like Bohdi isn't set up for branched yet. http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2012-February/000889.html On Feb 14 will be the "use bodhi and do updates" switch. Greetings, Tom -- devel mailing lis

Re: BTRFS as default in F17?

2012-01-23 Thread Thomas Spura
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:56 PM, Greg wrote: > will BTRFS be default in F17? going by a story posted on Phoronix there's > likely to be a fsck next month? > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTA0Njk Looks like these bugs needs to be resolved first: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sh

Re: service and user-agent disclosure - please consider privacy

2012-01-10 Thread Thomas Spura
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 10.01.2012 00:13, schrieb Richard: >> many of the different user agent and service banners are way >> too detailed for my taste > > thank you for supporting my opinion that a software should > per default disclose as less informations as

Re: Self Introduction

2012-01-02 Thread Thomas Spura
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Ofer Schreiber wrote: > As I'm not used to this kind of self-intro posts, I'll try to make this > one quick :) > > I'm Ofer Schreiber, and I've been working with several Linux distributions > for the past few years or so. > Currently, I'm working for Red Hat (leadin

Re: Please help do simulation build of two packages (xneur and gxneur)

2011-12-18 Thread Thomas Spura
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote: > Now I have problem building two packages and pushes into stable branches - > to build gxneur I need waiting until xneur go through testing and will be > pushed to stable. Sometimes, when karma can't be fast reached it spe

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCO meeting (2011-12-12 at 1800 UTC)

2011-12-13 Thread Thomas Spura
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:53 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 02:12:30PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 14:06 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 01:22:06PM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >> > > To some extent I agree with both sg

Re: ARPACK - Change of upstream

2011-12-11 Thread Thomas Spura
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 11:43 PM, TASAKA Mamoru wrote: > Jussi Lehtola wrote, at 12/12/2011 03:46 AM +9:00: >> Hi, >> >> Recently, a collaboration has picked up the pieces and started >> maintaining a new fork of ARPACK [2]. >> > > AFAIK forking or renaming will always require new review request.

Re: Non-responsive maintainer ?

2011-12-06 Thread Thomas Spura
2011/12/6 Kevin Fenzi : > On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 10:26:00 + > "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote: > >> It might be interesting to run this script across every single user >> in the Fedora accounts system, and proactively identify any users >> whom have not done anything in Fedora for a period longer than

Re: Non-responsive maintainer ?

2011-12-06 Thread Thomas Spura
2011/12/5 Pierre-Yves Chibon : > - koji ➙ last build... This doesn't seem to work correctly. My last build was 2 days ago: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/userinfo?userID=988 And the script says it was Nov 2... Otherwise a great start :) Thanks, Tom -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fe

Re: boost soname bump

2011-11-20 Thread Thomas Spura
2011/11/20 Jussi Lehtola > Is the bump for real this time? I remember that some time ago the > soname was bumped but then returned, so I had to do two unneeded builds. > -- > Unless there are too much problems with this yes: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F17Boost148 https://bugzilla.re

Re: Review swaps

2011-10-26 Thread Thomas Spura
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 09:18:55 -0600 Jerry James wrote: > The first two should be dead easy. From Fedora's point of view, > they're just data packages; no libraries or binaries are involved. > The third one is a bit complex. I had to tweak a lot of pathnames to > match existing Fedora practice, as

Re: Heads up - firefox desktop file change

2011-10-24 Thread Thomas Spura
On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:58:05 +0200 Martin Stransky wrote: > Firefox desktop file name has been changed in rawhide, from > mozilla-firefox.desktop to firefox.desktop. See bug > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736558. Ok. Could you also please comment to packaging the firefox/mozilla

Re: yubikey

2011-10-13 Thread Thomas Spura
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 23:02:36 -0700 Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:11:39PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: > > > > > As far as I know if you burn the key you will lose the ability to > > > use the yubikey's servers and I'm guessin

Re: Firefox on Fedora: No longer funny

2011-10-12 Thread Thomas Spura
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 20:58:15 +0200 Henrik Nordström wrote: > mån 2011-10-10 klockan 20:44 +0200 skrev Thomas Spura: > > > Forcing only critpath packages being in updates-testing and the rest > > being allowed to push to stable directly would help to fix issues > > much fa

Re: Firefox on Fedora: No longer funny

2011-10-11 Thread Thomas Spura
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:57:35 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 11:40 -0600, Tim Flink wrote: > > On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 13:16:52 +0200 > > Thomas Spura wrote: > > > > > It would be great, when bodhi would allow me to add an updated > > >

Re: Firefox on Fedora: No longer funny

2011-10-11 Thread Thomas Spura
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:01:00 -0400 David Michael wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Thomas Spura > wrote: > > The automatic requires proposed in bug #745038, does this: > > > >        Requires: firefox >= 3.0 > >        Requires: firefox &

Re: Upstream Release Monitor

2011-10-11 Thread Thomas Spura
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:45:17 -0500 Nathan O. wrote: > If I remember correctly I did update it in rawhide. > The master repo says it is updated to the latest version, by looking > at the SPEC > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=worker.git;a=blob_plain;f=worker.spec;hb=master Apparently, you

Re: Firefox on Fedora: No longer funny

2011-10-11 Thread Thomas Spura
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:36:01 -0400 Bill Nottingham wrote: > Thomas Spura (toms...@fedoraproject.org) said: > > > If the required updates are due to version checks in the > > > extensions, it might be possible to have RPM have a dependency > > > generator tha

Re: Firefox on Fedora: No longer funny

2011-10-11 Thread Thomas Spura
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:18:10 -0400 Bill Nottingham wrote: > Rahul Sundaram (methe...@gmail.com) said: > > On 10/10/2011 08:52 PM, Thomas Spura wrote: > > > > > So there doesn't need to be more co-maintainers (which is welcomed > > > anyway), but it wo

Re: Firefox on Fedora: No longer funny

2011-10-10 Thread Thomas Spura
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:18:10 -0400 Bill Nottingham wrote: > Rahul Sundaram (methe...@gmail.com) said: > > On 10/10/2011 08:52 PM, Thomas Spura wrote: > > > > > So there doesn't need to be more co-maintainers (which is welcomed > > > anyway), but it wo

Re: Firefox on Fedora: No longer funny

2011-10-10 Thread Thomas Spura
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 11:30:19 -0600 Tim Flink wrote: > On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 23:43:58 +0200 > Christoph Wickert wrote: > > > 3. Can someone (I'm looking at you, QA) make sure all > > extensions are still compatible? > > Anyone with a FAS account can pull updates from updates-testing and > pro

Re: Firefox on Fedora: No longer funny

2011-10-10 Thread Thomas Spura
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 03:41:43 +0530 Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 10/10/2011 03:33 AM, Till Maas wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 11:10:12PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> On 10/09/2011 10:59 PM, Vinzenz Vietzke wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> I'd prefer a bit less bleeding edge over breaking crucial > >

Re: Firefox on Fedora: No longer funny

2011-10-10 Thread Thomas Spura
On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 14:07:17 -0600 Peter Gueckel wrote: > Vinzenz Vietzke wrote: > > > Yeah sometimes is okay of course. Happening every two or three weeks > > it isn't. > > So, why are you using devel? > This happened on F-15. -Tom -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Firefox on Fedora: No longer funny

2011-10-09 Thread Thomas Spura
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 11:05:28 +0200 Till Maas wrote: > On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 11:43:58PM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > > 3. Can someone (I'm looking at you, QA) make sure all > > extensions are still compatible? > > The problem is that testers seem to ignore test cases provided for > u

Re: rawhide report: 20110903 changes

2011-09-04 Thread Thomas Spura
On Sat, 3 Sep 2011 12:37:37 + Rawhide Report wrote: > Broken deps for x86_64 > -- > FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires > libosgViewer.so.74()(64bit) FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires > libosgUtil.so.74()(64bit) FlightGear-

Re: Notice of intent: patching glibc

2011-08-31 Thread Thomas Spura
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:11:54 +0200 Thomas Spura wrote: > On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:00:43 +0200 > Andreas Schwab wrote: > > > Zoltan Boszormenyi writes: > > > > > The "I can 100%..." is not the first sentence of the comment > > > but it's

Re: Notice of intent: patching glibc

2011-08-31 Thread Thomas Spura
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:00:43 +0200 Andreas Schwab wrote: > Zoltan Boszormenyi writes: > > > The "I can 100%..." is not the first sentence of the comment > > but it's all in there. > > I'm taking about the redhat bug. How do I get to know about all this > if nobody tells me? Yep... If this wo

Re: Compiler as Require

2011-08-26 Thread Thomas Spura
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 16:34:22 -0300 Sergio Belkin wrote: > Hi > Is it OK include a compiler (eg gcc-c++) for a "-devel" subpackage? I'd say, it depends on the use case... Why do you want to do that? * Only to have some piece of software installed, which can handle the (C++?) source code? Then

Re: pdfedit

2011-08-21 Thread Thomas Spura
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011 18:04:48 +0200 Joachim Backes wrote: > Hi, > > in F15 I could install pdfedit by yum. Anybody knows when this will > be possible in F16? Hi Joachim, It won't be possible in the near future, because it's orphaned: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/pdfedit Unles

Re: Attention: rawhide packages needing rebuilds due to the trailing slash bug of rpm-4.9.1

2011-08-17 Thread Thomas Spura
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 12:10:03 +0300 Panu Matilainen wrote: > Hi all, > > Due to the brown paperbag bug of rpm-4.9.1 causing unwanted trailing > slashes on directories (with various nasty side-effects), the > following packages in rawhide require rebuilding, the sooner the > better to stop spreadi

Re: Heads-up: ipython-0.11 breaking anything :)

2011-08-06 Thread Thomas Spura
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 14:22:35 -0600 Jerry James wrote: > On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Jerry James > wrote: > Also, I can test now, and it looks like python-polybori is broken by > the new ipython. When I try to run ipbori, I get an ipython help > message, followed by this: > > [TerminalIPython

Re: Intel HD 3000 video & blank screen during install of F15

2011-08-03 Thread Thomas Spura
On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 08:58:27 -0400 Ric Wheeler wrote: > > I have a shiny new laptop (HP Pavilion dm4) with the Sandy Bridge > video (HD 3000). Installing F15 or the nightly F16 build causes a > blank screen during the install. Installing/running basic video works > but is annoying. > > I have sp

Re: Heads-up: ipython-0.11 breaking anything :)

2011-08-03 Thread Thomas Spura
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 14:22:35 -0600 Jerry James wrote: > On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Jerry James > wrote: > > Unfortunately, I can't test it.  I waited for today's Rawhide update > > so I could get the new version of ipython.  About 2 seconds after > > the yum transaction finished, X suddenly q

Heads-up: ipython-0.11 breaking anything :)

2011-07-31 Thread Thomas Spura
Hi list, I just build ipython-0.11 in rawhide, which changed pretty much anything internally, so *ALL* dependant packages will be possible broken. repoquery just reports 2 packages, but it should be more...: python-networkx python-polybori Missing packages (maybe more): python-matplotlib scipy

Re: Defining build options based on available compiler version

2011-07-30 Thread Thomas Spura
On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 21:39:24 +0100 Niels de Vos wrote: > Watch out, this is very dangerous! You are comparing strings, not > versions: > >>> print '4.6.2' >= '4.6.12' > True Thanks... I was testing with to low numbers... :( > The better way would be to use distutils.version: > >>> from distutils

Re: Defining build options based on available compiler version

2011-07-30 Thread Thomas Spura
On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 19:44:41 +0300 Jussi Lehtola wrote: > Hi, > > > I tried using > %global gccver %(gcc -dumpversion) > %if %{gccver} >= 4.6.0 > foo here > %endif > > to conditionalize usage of quadruple precision support in a spec file > that ships on multiple distros, but the compariso

Re: Starting a SIG for package reviews

2011-07-27 Thread Thomas Spura
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 01:01:36 -0500 Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > For a while now I've wanted to get some sort of package review SIG > going. The package review process hasn't really evolved much since it > was instituted way back when, and now it (and the portion of the > sponsorship process it o

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages in F-16

2011-07-13 Thread Thomas Spura
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 09:55:30 +1000 Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:05:14PM +0200, Thomas Spura wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:28:59 -0400 > > Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > > > Orphan gpointing-device-settings > > > > This is co-

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages in F-16

2011-07-12 Thread Thomas Spura
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:28:59 -0400 Bill Nottingham wrote: > Orphan gpointing-device-settings This is co-maintained by whot (not shown in this list). I definitely want to keep this. Peter: Do you continue as primary maintainer and I'll co-maintain it, or do you want to stay co-maintainer?

Re: Orphaning gbirthday and linbox

2011-05-15 Thread Thomas Spura
On Sat, 14 May 2011 21:14:20 -0600 Jerry James wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 6:46 AM, Thomas Spura > wrote: > >        * linbox: > >          Required for SAGE [1], but FTBFS since a while and the new > >          version now requires another package, not yet in fed

Orphaning gbirthday and linbox

2011-05-12 Thread Thomas Spura
Hi list, I'm orphaning gbirthday and linbox, because I either don't use them anymore or it's too much work to integrate it into fedora... * gbirthday: I don't use it anymore, and it has some SQL bugs open (I don't use SQL either, so I can't debug it etc.) * li

Re: AutoQA: distro congestion?

2011-04-19 Thread Thomas Spura
On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 10:40:22 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 18:30 +0200, Thomas Spura wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 08:37:25 -0700 > > Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 11:05 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > >

Re: AutoQA: distro congestion?

2011-04-19 Thread Thomas Spura
On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 08:37:25 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 11:05 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > Some packagers have been observed circumventing the system by > > configuring a karma threshold of 1, so their own +1 vote or the > > first one from an arbitrary tester mak

Re: Is Rawhide dead ?

2011-04-04 Thread Thomas Spura
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 07:55:42 +0200 Pablo Martin-Gomez wrote: > Hi, > > Since the 28th of March, Rawhide get no more updates as the rawhide > report show up (or better said, don't show up) by its disappearance. > The last update I got was a broken NetworkManager and > Empathy/Gnome-Shell ('cos of t

Re: Broken deps in F15 tree

2011-03-01 Thread Thomas Spura
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 12:42:08 +0200 Jussi Lehtola wrote: > Hi, > > > I wonder why I'm still getting nag mails about > > pokerth has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree: > On x86_64: > pokerth-0.8.3-1.fc15.x86_64 requires > libboost_iostreams-mt.so.1.44.0()(64bit) > pokerth-0.8.3-1.fc15.x86_64 r

Re: boost 1.46.0

2011-02-06 Thread Thomas Spura
On Sat, 05 Feb 2011 11:05:57 +0100 Petr Machata wrote: > 04.02.2011 14:33, Petr Machata wrote: > > I'm in the process of test-driving a couple packages locally to make > > sure that the new boost works. If that turns out well, I'll do a > > non-scratch build of boost-1.46.0-0.beta1 later today. [

Re: fedpkg build version numbering discrepancy

2011-01-27 Thread Thomas Spura
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:46:34 -0500 Jean-Marc Pigeon wrote: > rversion=2.1 > subversion=400 > > > Spec file extract: > Version: %{rversion}.%{subversion} > Release: 2%{?locmark} > Source: ./%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz > > So the potential for disasters

Re: Vacation/devaway system

2010-12-13 Thread Thomas Spura
On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:07:51 +0100 Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > Hi, > > there have been quite a few unresponsive maintainers processes in past > few months + there are people that don't respond to emails in timely > fashion. > > I'd like to have a system where anyone can see which maintainers a

Re: [Help]/proc/acpi/fan empty and CPUFan never Stop

2010-11-24 Thread Thomas Spura
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 19:23:31 -0300 João Neto wrote: > 2010/11/24 João Neto > > > I Running Fedora 14 x64 on HP G42 250Br ( Intel 5 Series/3400Series > > Chipset Family ) on Core i3 330M; > > > > After boot, the CPU temp is 58º C, after 1 or 2 minutes, without any > operation, the CPU tem is 78º

Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2010-11-17)

2010-11-22 Thread Thomas Spura
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 14:32:04 -0800 Jesse Keating wrote: > On 11/22/10 12:47 PM, Till Maas wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:31:05PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote: > > > >> So they stay in updates-testing until someone does actually test > >> them. > >> > >> We all know that the longer that updates

Re: F-14 Branched report: 20101026 changes

2010-10-26 Thread Thomas Spura
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:15:03 +0200 Dan Horák wrote: > Jesse Keating píše v Út 26. 10. 2010 v 12:01 -0700: > > On 10/26/10 11:46 AM, Branched Report wrote: > > > Updated Packages: > > > > > > tryton-1.6.1-1.fc14 > > > --- > > > * Tue Jul 27 2010 Dan Horák 1.6.1-1 > > > - update to

Re: Anaconda suggestion...

2010-10-21 Thread Thomas Spura
eful in that case, e.g. moving every 0.2 seconds. -- Thomas Spura -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Who is working on python3 packages?

2010-10-20 Thread Thomas Spura
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:22:14 -0400 Neal Becker wrote: > Thomas Spura wrote: > > > On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 08:36:23 -0400 > > Neal Becker wrote: > > > >> I have started porting to python3. So far I have a patch for > >> fpconst. I have not so far been abl

Re: rawhide report: 20101020 changes

2010-10-20 Thread Thomas Spura
gt; Broken deps for i386 > -- > dreampie-python3-1.1-5.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:3.1 Should be fixed now: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=201221 -- Thomas Spura -- devel mailing list devel

Re: Who is working on python3 packages?

2010-10-20 Thread Thomas Spura
age and open a bug, so the original maintainer accept that change to the package. If upstream released an extra python3 package, I sometimes package that and get it in fedora. I don't think we need a python3 SIG for that. Isn't the python SIG enought? ;-) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/S

Re: Does anybody know how to contact Mohamed El Morabity

2010-10-19 Thread Thomas Spura
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 20:50:24 +0200 Chris Spike wrote: > Hi, > > Mohamed unfortunately doesn't answer > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578957 or private mail, so > does anybody know how to get in touch with him? I'd try pikachu_2014 [at] jabber.fr (obviously via XMPP ;-)), but I didn

orphaning pychess

2010-10-11 Thread Thomas Spura
Hi list, I'm orphaning pychess, because I don't use it that often anymore and I don't have time to take care properly for all the bugs (and it needs some love...): 23 open bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&product=Fedora&component=pychess&bug_status=NEW&bug_statu

Re: Chain builds for non-rawhide

2010-10-08 Thread Thomas Spura
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 15:37:19 -0700 Jesse Keating wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 10/5/10 2:30 PM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote: > > Well, how about creating "dist-f14-for-chainbuild" build target and > > allow people to tag or untag build as/from that tag freely? > > > > F

Re: fedpkg koji error

2010-10-07 Thread Thomas Spura
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:19:21 +0200 Farkas Levente wrote: > hi, > while try to make a scratch build i always got: > - > # fedpkg scratch-build > Could not log into koji: Opening a SSL connection failed > - > even if i t

Re: Python 3.2a1 in rawhide

2010-08-23 Thread Thomas Spura
On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 23:29:38 +0800 Chen Lei wrote: > 2010/8/22 Thomas Spura : > > On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 18:48:31 -0400 > > David Malcolm wrote: > > [snip] > >> > >> So you'll need to update the %files for python3 subpackages, > >> listing somet

  1   2   >