Re: F39 proposal: Modernize Thread Building Blocks for Fedora 39 (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022). The Fedora community has > > > expressed [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036372 > > > interest] in moving the TBB package to track a more modern version of > > > the upstream. > > > > > > == Owner == > > > * Name: [[User:trodger

Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

Yes. On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 12:51 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 26. 02. 23 v 17:07 Jonathan Wakely napsal(a): > > On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 18:23, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> > >> Dne 23. 02. 23 v 12:41 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): > >>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 12:28:48PM +0100, Kalev Lembe

Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

Which has a successful build in rawhide now. On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 8:08 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 18:23, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > > > Dne 23. 02. 23 v 12:41 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): > > >

Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

systemtap is FTBFS because dyninst is FTBFS, see PR2173030 for dyninst. On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 2:49 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > boost 1.81.0 (side tag f39-boost) was merged into Fedora earlier this week: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.

Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

PR2173019 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173019> has been created. The file in question was updated within the last three days, but not to fix this issue. On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 7:47 AM Thomas Rodgers wrote: > ceph is FTBFS due to a change in Boost Asio. I'll

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 39 Boost 1.81 rebuilds starting Monday 2022-02-20

On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 5:14 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 at 20:52, Thomas Rodgers wrote: > > > > The f39-boost side tag builds have finished. > > > > The following packages are new FTBFS likely due to the Boost update - &

Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

ceph is FTBFS due to a change in Boost Asio. I'll file a PR this morning. usr/include/boost/asio/async_result.hpp:651:9: error: no type named 'completion_handler_type' in 'class boost::asio::async_result, void(boost::system::error_code, ceph::buffer::v15_2_0::list)>' 651 | completion_han

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 39 Boost 1.81 rebuilds starting Monday 2022-02-20

On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 12:51 PM Thomas Rodgers wrote: > The f39-boost side tag builds have finished. > > The following packages are new FTBFS likely due to the Boost update - > - mapnik [[https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172635][PR2172635]] > Boost.Phoenix related

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 39 Boost 1.81 rebuilds starting Monday 2022-02-20

On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 8:33 PM Thomas Rodgers wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 2:41 PM Mamoru TASAKA > wrote: > >> Thomas Rodgers wrote on 2023/02/23 5:51: >> > The f39-boost side tag builds have finished. >> > >> > The following packa

Re: Unannounced .so version bump (F38/F39): openexr2

I rebuilt bcd, luxcorender is failing on it. On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 7:43 PM Ben Beasley wrote: > The openexr2 compat package was just updated from 2.5.7 to 2.5.8 in > F39/Rawhide. This included a bump of the “imfsover,” the .so version for > the libIlmImf-2_5 and libIlmImfUtil-2_5 libraries. >

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 39 Boost 1.81 rebuilds starting Monday 2022-02-20

On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 2:41 PM Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Thomas Rodgers wrote on 2023/02/23 5:51: > > The f39-boost side tag builds have finished. > > > > The following packages are new FTBFS likely due to the Boost update - > > > > The following packages FTBFS but

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 39 Boost 1.81 rebuilds starting Monday 2022-02-20

imath is listed as a prerequisite for OpenImageIO, but not openvdb. Fixed now. On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 4:05 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 23. 02. 23 0:56, Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 2:52 PM Thomas Rodgers > <mailto:trodg...@redhat.com>> wrote: > >

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 39 Boost 1.81 rebuilds starting Monday 2022-02-20

Looks like I missed capturing some dependencies in the Makefile that drives these rebuilds. I'll adjust accordingly for the next time we update Boost. On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 3:57 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 2:52 PM Thomas Rodgers > wrote: > >> Th

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 39 Boost 1.81 rebuilds starting Monday 2022-02-20

://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3952/97793952/build.log][build.log ]] - usd [[ https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/5975/97845975/build.log][build.log ]] On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 9:16 AM Thomas Rodgers wrote: > Builds are starting now. > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 9:54

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 39 Boost 1.81 rebuilds starting Monday 2022-02-20

Builds are starting now. On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 9:54 AM Thomas Rodgers wrote: > We expect to start rebuilds for > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F39Boost181 > in the f39-boost side tag Monday 2022-02-20. > > If your package depends on Boost, or just if you see a "

[HEADS UP] Fedora 39 Boost 1.81 rebuilds starting Monday 2022-02-20

We expect to start rebuilds for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F39Boost181 in the f39-boost side tag Monday 2022-02-20. If your package depends on Boost, or just if you see a "Rebuilt for Boost 1.81" commit pushed to your package's dist-git repo, please coordinate with me about any updates

[HEADS UP] Fedora 37 Boost 1.78 rebuilds starting in a side tag

We are starting the rebuilds forhttps://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F37Boost178 in the f37-boost side tag. If your package depends on Boost, or just if you see a "Rebuilt for Boost 1.78" commit pushed to your package's dist-git repo, please c

Re: Problem with cmake 3.23.0

One more package that FTBFS due to CMake issues - grive2: FTBFS # Error: /builddir/build/BUILD/grive2-0.5.1/redhat-linux-build is not a directory On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 2:22 PM Thomas Rodgers wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 4:37 AM Jonathan Wakely > wrote: > >&g

Re: F37 Change: Boost 1.78 upgrade (System-Wide Change proposal)

with. On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 6:12 PM Thomas Rodgers wrote: > I started on it in anger last week. I've been tracking down some breakage > in the upstream's build build that was preventing me from getting a > successful .rpm build, so I haven't even started to evaluate depe

Re: Problem with cmake 3.23.0

On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 4:37 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 at 14:26, Steven A. Falco > wrote: > > > > There is a new FTBFS for KiCad [1]. I filed an issue with KiCad [2] and > got a comment from the project leader: > > > > This looks like cmake issue to me. For some reason

Re: F37 Change: Boost 1.78 upgrade (System-Wide Change proposal)

I started on it in anger last week. I've been tracking down some breakage in the upstream's build build that was preventing me from getting a successful .rpm build, so I haven't even started to evaluate dependent package breakage. I expect to have a scratch build done by this time tomorrow. On Tue

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 35 Boost 1.76 rebuilds starting in a side tag

FTBFS issues inline - On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 3:01 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 at 10:21, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 at 18:23, Benjamin Beasley wrote: > > > > > > It looks like none of the packages I maintain or co-maintain that > depend on boost-devel

Unresponsive Maintainer request for package tbb (Thread Building Blocks)

I am the Red Hat maintainer for this package in RHEL and CentOS, it has been requested that I also get added to the Fedora package maintainers so that I can handle requests like - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tbb/pull-request/5 As well as a current issue I am working with the upstream proje