On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Stu Tomlinson wrote:
> Jan,
>
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 02/10/2014 01:32 PM, Jan Synacek wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>&g
Jan,
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/10/2014 01:32 PM, Jan Synacek wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've been trying to contact Stu Tomlinson for a while now -- in a
>> bugzilla [1]
[still active]
> Last package update on bodhi:
>2011-12-29 13:24:47 on package pidgin-2.10.1-1.fc16
> Last email on mailing list:
>2010-06-11 gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel
>167 bugs assigned, cc or on which s...@nosnilmot.com commented
> Last comment on the most rece
Getting back to the topic of this original email...
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 09:40, Thomas Moschny wrote:
> pidgin-2.7.1-2.fc13 obsoletes pidgin <= 2.7.1-1.fc13, is that meaningful?
Yes, it's meaningful because it allows updates to pidgin > 2.7.1-1 to
pull in the pidgin-evolution package without r
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 11:19, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 14:06:48 +0400, Peter wrote:
>
>> 2010/6/9 Chen Lei:
>>
>> > But in this case, the obsoletes seems excessive, since
>> > pidgin-evolution already depends on pidgin. If pidgin-evolution don't
>> > depend on pidgin, the obso
