Hi,
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 00:57 +0100
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Steven Ellis wrote:
> > The issue on our home systems is 3rd party printer drivers.
> >
> > Eg
> > mfc9140cdncupswrapper-1.1.4-0.i386
> > dcpj4120dwlpr-3.0.1-1.i386
> > dcpj4120dwcupswrapper-3.0.1-1.i386
> > mfc9140cdnlpr-1.1.2-
Hi,
On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 09:54:12 -0400
David Cantrell wrote:
> If you use i686 packages for something now, please respond to this
> thread.
As many others, I need 32-bit printer drivers for my ~10 year old color
laser:
$ rpm -qa | grep i686
libgcc-11.2.1-9.fc35.i686
glibc-gconv-extra-2.34-28.fc
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 08:03:20 -0600
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 09:07:39 +0200
> Jan Zelený wrote:
>
> > Any other suggestions then? Cause `pkg` would be my #1 choice.
>
> Personally, I think adding another name just adds another problem.
>
> kevin
>
This, please do not invent
Hi,
On Sun, 03 Nov 2013 14:23:28 +0100
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Michael Scherer wrote:
> > When statistics cost you money, yeah, I think that's important to
> > take them in account. Maybe your employer do not care about this,
> > but I strongly suspect mine does, and I strongly suspect that most
>
On Thu, 23 May 2013 14:02:34 +0200
Jan Zelený wrote:
> On 23. 5. 2013 at 10:53:10, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> > I would like better integration with domain-specific package
> > managers. By which I mean npm (for node.js), gem (for ruby), pip
> > (for python), cpan (for perl), pecl
Hi,
I would like better integration with domain-specific package managers.
By which I mean npm (for node.js), gem (for ruby), pip (for python),
cpan (for perl), pecl/pear (for PHP), CRAN (for R), CTAN (for TeX), and
many more I'm sure.
By integrating RPM with these package managers, I feel it wou
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 22:35:41 +0200
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> It isn't working because it's adding hundreds of new policy bugs in
> every new Fedora release.
Seriously, can you please stop extrapolating from your personal
usecase, and think of both the developers and actual users of the
technology t
On Fri, 8 Feb 2013 20:35:56 +0100
"Nicolas Mailhot" wrote:
>
> Le Ven 8 février 2013 13:22, Olav Vitters a écrit :
> > On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 10:34:58AM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> >> I am providing a datapoint that directly contradicts your original
> &g
On Fri, 08 Feb 2013 07:47:48 +0100
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 02/06/2013 08:42 AM, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> > On Tue, 05 Feb 2013 21:46:32 +0100
> > Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >> The actual problem is the current Gnome 3 being an entirely
> >> different product than
On Tue, 05 Feb 2013 21:46:32 +0100
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> The actual problem is the current Gnome 3 being an entirely different
> product than Gnome 2, which usability-wise has *nothing* in common
> with Gnome2 and addresses a completely different target audience.
Ralf, could you please stop th
Hi,
On Tue, 05 Feb 2013 19:01:49 +0800
Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 11:12 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > Sigh, let me try again: The Fedora project is pushing away Fedora
> > users from Fedora, because Fedora/RH have missed that it's "new
> > DE" (Gnome3) is addressing a differ
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 14:30:04 -0800
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 20:20 +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 14:07:55 -0500
> > john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
> >
> > > > From: Martin Sivak
> > > > the tool will be
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 14:07:55 -0500
john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
> > From: Martin Sivak
> > the tool will be started using systemd unit file which can be
> > disabled. It will have to be explicit (even minimal install needs
> > users or root password), but we can figure something out.
>
> In my
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 11:48:01 -0700
Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Jan 29, 2013, at 9:44 AM, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
>
> > (I'm not sure if the new installer
> > even has an option for password-protecting grub2, offhand.)
>
> It doesn't. And this seems to be an area of confusion on the two grub
>
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 17:31:33 -0500
James Antill wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 15:04 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:58:56PM +, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > > = Features/YumGroupsAsObjects =
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/YumGroupsAsObjects
> >
>
Hi,
On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:59:46 +0100
Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 21.12.2012 20:58, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky napsal(a):
> > Why don't we just ship 'rvm' or 'rbenv' and force everyone to
> > manage their own Ruby environments? ;-)
>
> There used to be RVM in Fedora, but we dropped it, since it canno
Hi,
On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 16:29:57 -0700
Michael Stahnke wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 4:22 PM,
> Seth Vidal wrote:
> > I'm less worried about the people requesting the newness b/c they
> > clearly want change. I'm worried about the people who run rhel b/c
> > they fear change.
>
> I'm more worr
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 21:21:00 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 22:03 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:51:00AM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
> > > > It's cute, but I think might read a bit bizarre in isolation.
> > > > 'Ready for testing' is terminally b
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 12:36:26 +
Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
[...]
> ---
> * Fri Jul 27 2012 - Andreas Schneider -
> 2:4.0.0-132.beta4
> - Don't define an Epoch in RHEL releases.
May I ask why?
This makes it harder to compare versions between Fedora and RHEL. I
know
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:22:22 +0100
Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 20 June 2012 08:08, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> > I agree that mind reading computers may not be the final answer...
>
> Well, switching to system-update.service from a running desktop should
> probably kill off everyt
Hi,
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 02:22:26 + (UTC)
Ben Boeckel wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 13:19:13 GMT, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> > I wonder if it would be possible to do it on shutdown instead of
> > during start up? I usually do not care if shutdown takes ten
> > seconds or five minutes, but whe
Hi,
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:15:14 +0200
Roman Kennke wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 13.06.2012, 13:05 +0100 schrieb Johannes Lips:
> > I think the reason for shipping the latest upstream kernel is based
> > on the fact that backporting would be too much work.
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/KernelReb
On Mon, 21 May 2012 13:40:55 +0200
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 05/21/2012 12:21 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > On 05/21/12 10:23, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >> On 05/21/2012 09:56 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> >>> - Original Message -
> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 07:07:56PM +0200, Remi Collet w
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 08:11:24 -0600
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 14:02:39 +0100
> Stijn Hoop wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > did I miss the last two days of rawhide compose mails or are they
> > failing? If so where can I check?
>
> http://lists
Hi,
did I miss the last two days of rawhide compose mails or are they
failing? If so where can I check?
Regards,
--Stijn
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:37:33 +0100
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Note that this has not actually been implemented in anaconda yet,
> > so if you do an anaconda upgrade at this time, it will explode
> > horribly. The bug requesting this support be added to anaconda is
> > http://
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:00:30 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> I realize this isn't a very constructive mail, and the point has been
> raised before, but I'm hoping at some point the sheer weight of
> complaints will cause someone more creative than myself to actually
> come up with a notification
Hi,
thanks for the detailed instructions for testing. I am not sure
though, whether any of this is applicable on a system already running
rawhide?
Reading this, I surmise that I have to do the following steps once
these packages hit rawhide. Can you comment on the correctness?
> Currently instal
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 07:20:20 -0500
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Well, the proposal I'm making is the one that I've been following
> personally in my own projects, which I feel is providing better
> service to my users.
Speaking as a (mostly) user: I agree with this statement. I would rather
have th
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 14:38:57 -0600
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Stijn Hoop wrote:
>
> > Well it also took them two years to consider 'NFS mounted home' a
> > valid use case, during which the whole 'you really need MySQL!!!'
> > was broken for our site.
>
&
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 20:20:55 +0100
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
> > I'm of a mind to revisit this (again).
>
> NO, not again!!!
>
> Can we please stop this nonsense?
>
> Upstream defaults to MySQL for a reason, and strongly recommends NOT
> using the SQLite backend by default. SQLit
On Thu, 08 Dec 2011 19:02:26 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 08.12.2011 17:04, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> > Reindl Harald wrote:
> >> my only changes was compile the x264.119 and fake the so-number
> >> in the sources to .102 for F13/F14 and to .114/.115 for F15
> >> and currently the .120 to 115
> >
On Thu, 08 Dec 2011 11:07:10 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
> but they are often way behind current versions (ffmpeg, x264,
> open-vm-tools) and then throw out a new x264, rebuild all packages
> depending on it and rais only from .114 to .115 is a bad joke
> while .119 exists since months
>
> and yes
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 13:33:00 +0100
Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 08.11.11 13:31, Stijn Hoop (st...@sandcat.nl) wrote:
>
> > > Well, that way attackers might still be able fool the admin: i.e.
> > > he could create a directory with a service name and some
> &g
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 12:55:31 +0100
Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 07.11.11 21:53, Gregory Maxwell (gmaxw...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Lennart Poettering
> > wrote:
> > > If run on the main namespace all they see is that the files are
> > > in some randomized su
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:36:13 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Just Glibc Update Comedy Hour again.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745675
>
> downgrade to glibc -10 fixes it.
So, just to ask a rhetorical question, how does this tie in to "running
rawhide is bad mmkay" again?
--St
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:36:50 +0200
Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> I would strongly prefer third parties not to reinvent whole
> packaging and repositories concept. Some companies grasp it (I have
> yum repos provided for Google Earth and Talk Plugin, Dell BIOSes and
> firmwares, Adobe Flash and Air, Vir
Hi,
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 10:57:59 +0200
drago01 wrote:
...
> Distro packaged extensions are frowned upon upstream.
[citation needed]
--Stijn
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:43:09 +0200
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le mercredi 27 juillet 2011 à 12:26 +0200, Stijn Hoop a écrit :
> > and even better is the fact that I can now put that area
> > somewhere else than on our default stupidly-expensive backupped NFS
> > filesyste
Hi,
aside from the merits of adding ~/.local/bin, I just wanted to point
out:
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:19:51 +0200
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> It's all been done to make nautilus happy with "user-friendly"
> "localized" names on the user desktop (aping the windows mess). And
> now gnome3 people have
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 21:06:03 +0200
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le mardi 19 juillet 2011 à 18:30 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" a
> écrit :
>
> > Hum best is to provide you with example which daemon do you
> > maintain I can convert it for you and provide it to you as an
> > example anyway here's an
41 matches
Mail list logo
