Re: system clock stuck on utc

2011-12-21 Thread Steven I Usdansky
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769476 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: xorg-x11 gone squiffy in rawhide?

2011-04-21 Thread Steven I Usdansky
Here's what's currently working for me in Rawhide (AMD 5400+, onboard nvidia 9100): xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-0.0.16-24.20110324git8378443.fc16.x86_64 xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.10.0-5.fc16.x86_64 kernel-2.6.39-0.rc3.git2.0.fc16.x86_64 (manually deleted microcode.ko) -- RockDoctor -- devel mailing li

Re: Compiz 0.9 landing in Rawhide

2011-01-19 Thread Steven I Usdansky
Just upgraded to the latest and greatest. Most of compiz seems to work properly. However, ccsm-0.9.2.1-1 now crashes when I try to set command key bindings. Reverting to ccsm-0.8.4-5 did not solve the problem. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproje

Re: Compiz 0.9 landing in Rawhide

2011-01-19 Thread Steven I Usdansky
Compiz works, but emerald refuses to decorate my windows ccsm-0.9.2.1-1.fc15.noarch.rpm compiz-0.9.2.2-0.8.git619abc05b1.fc15.x86_64.rpm compizconfig-python-0.9.2.1-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm compiz-plugins-main-0.9.2.1-4.fc15.x86_64.rpm fusion-icon-0.1.0-0.9.5e2dc9git.fc15.noarch.rpm fusion-icon-gtk-0.1.

Re: Compiz 0.9 landing in Rawhide

2011-01-18 Thread Steven I Usdansky
I have to agree with there being too many way to launch compiz. I've decided I like having the fusion-icon applet in the panel, so I'll wait to see what you've been able to do with fusion-icon. Compiz-gtk wants to pull in 13 new packages - that's 13 too many, especially when one of them (metacity)

Re: Compiz 0.9 landing in Rawhide

2011-01-18 Thread Steven I Usdansky
Any advice for those of us using compiz (fusion-icon) with LXDE? Fusion-icon crashes with compiz 0.9. Moving ~/.config/compiz aside and modifying lxsession to use compiz rather than fusion icon left me without window decorations and a usable mouse -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedorap

Re: urgent testing call: F13 kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13

2010-04-07 Thread Steven I Usdansky
Already running 2.6.33.1-26.fc13.i686 on my HP s3707c (AMD 5400+ Nvidia 9100 onboard) . No problems -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Live image from filesystem snapshot?

2010-03-22 Thread Steven I Usdansky
Not sure where to send this request, but since it was inspired by the Fedora has become fat! discussion, this seems like an appropriate place. I have a nicely tweaked installation of the LXDE spin sitting on my hard drive that I would like to snapshot and place on a live USB stick (ideally with per

Re: Stable Release Updates types proposal (was Re: Fedora Board Meeting Recap 2010-03-11)

2010-03-12 Thread Steven I Usdansky
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 04:39:30AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> Matthew Garrett wrote: >>> If the software is not maintained within Fedora, there's no notification >>> of soname bumps. >> There is, soname bumps are supposed to be announced on this public list. > A list that is targetted at deve

Re: Adventurous yet Safety-Minded

2010-03-10 Thread Steven I Usdansky
I realize this doesn't address the concern about not pushing broken updates to begin with. However, if yum and/or rpm could do a downgrade from locally cached delta, it would make reverting the change that broke the system much easier. This obviously won't work if it's rpm that breaks, but that is

Adventurous yet Safety-Minded

2010-03-10 Thread Steven I Usdansky
Instead of worrying about the occasional brokenness caused by an update to a stable release, how about focusing on a mechanism to easily recover from it? As long as the update hasn't corrupted any critical files, my non-optimal solution is to head over to koji, grab the last version of the broke