Orphaning pyicq-t package

2016-03-24 Thread Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
Dear all, I'm orphaning the package pyicq-t in all branches. The last upstream release was at the end of 2009. Best wishes, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Easy way of testing packages?

2012-06-04 Thread Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
On Sun, 2012-06-03 at 23:51 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: [...] > If you're in a hurry to get an update earlier, you can use koji or bodhi > command-line tools to download specific NEVRs or (in the case of bodhi) > update IDs. > > e.g.: > > bodhi -D FEDORA-2012-7716 > bodhi -D mesa-8.0.2-8.fc17 >

Re: MATE 1.2

2012-06-02 Thread Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
On Sat, 2012-06-02 at 10:21 -0400, Randall Berry wrote: > Does anyone plan to package MATE 1.2[1] for Fedora? MATE is a promising > A Gnome 2.3 fork. If so I would like to be a co-maintainer. Or if > nobody is planning on it I'll gladly start the project with a little > help from a co-maintainer.

Re: Easy way of testing packages?

2012-06-02 Thread Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
On Sat, 2012-06-02 at 17:00 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote: > > is there an easy way to test packages except of using > > > > $ yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update > > yum install yum-security > yum --enablerepo=updates-testi

Easy way of testing packages?

2012-06-02 Thread Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
Hi all, is there an easy way to test packages except of using $ yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update For example, on May 30 a message reached the devel list that Pidgin needs an update because of a security flaw. A new package was created and needed karma in order to get pushed to stable qui

Re: ipv6 tools + ipv4 tools fusion.

2011-04-27 Thread Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
On Mi, 2011-04-27 at 20:17 -0300, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: > why ipv6 and ipv4 have different name for the tools ? > > for example > > ping6 and ping > > I think it's possible writing a wrapper to detect if a ip is v4 or v6 > and execute the correct cmd, $ ping{6} www.kame.net If you are u

Re: chrony as default NTP client?

2010-05-10 Thread Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
On So, 2010-05-09 at 11:45 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: [...] > 1) Why chrony? Why not OpenNTPD [fill in the blank here] Dunno if this is important for this discussion but the portable version of OpenNTPD is stuck. The last portable version was made available in May 2006 while the OpenBSD ve

Re: urgent testing call: F13 kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13

2010-04-14 Thread Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
On Mi, 2010-04-07 at 16:51 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 22:30 +0200, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote: > > On Mi, 2010-04-07 at 09:17 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > [...] > > > Thanks to everyone for their testing, it's greatly appreciated

Re: X.org on F13 Alpha and monitor setup

2010-03-09 Thread Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
On Di, 2010-03-09 at 07:45 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 15:43 +0100, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote: > > Today I wanted to give F13 Alpha a test and installed it. The > > installation went fine but I do not get a proper screen resolution > > setup

X.org on F13 Alpha and monitor setup

2010-03-09 Thread Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
Today I wanted to give F13 Alpha a test and installed it. The installation went fine but I do not get a proper screen resolution setup. The basic setup was done via system-config-display, I only added a modeline. But it seems to me that the modeline is ignored. Is this a new behavior because of ker

Re: FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

2010-02-26 Thread Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
On Fr, 2010-02-26 at 13:16 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: [...] > We really need more transparency in decision making! [...] > If you can think of more, please post them! But even if you just agree with > me, please reply so the other FESCo members don't think it's just me! +1 -- devel mailing list

Re: ABRT unusable again

2010-02-07 Thread Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
On So, 2010-02-07 at 15:34 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sun, 07 Feb 2010 14:23:13 +0100, Stefan wrote: > > > The question was if the package maintainer should > > be triggered first instead of upstream which increases the load for the > > package maintainer who might not be able to handle a

Re: ABRT unusable again

2010-02-07 Thread Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
On So, 2010-02-07 at 12:52 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: [...] > There is an analogy actually. Regardless of whether the Fedora Project > consists of many volunteers, who do unpaid stuff in their spare time, > Fedora delivers a product and will have to deal with its consumers and > negative feedba

Re: ABRT unusable again

2010-02-07 Thread Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
On So, 2010-02-07 at 09:03 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 02/07/2010 03:15 AM, Karel Klic wrote: > > Kevin Kofler wrote: > >> Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote: > >>> However, in the meantime I stopped reporting crashes via ABRT because I > >>> think i

Re: ABRT unusable again

2010-02-06 Thread Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
On Sa, 2010-02-06 at 14:08 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: [...] > I'm happy about every detailed backtrace I get, but I would be even more > happy if users contributed a tiny bit more and added comments to their > tickets and responded to NEEDINFO queries and gave feedback on Test > Updates. ABRT

Re: RFC: Remove write permissions from executables

2010-01-26 Thread Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 14:48 -0600, Garrett Holmstrom wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Till Maas wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:45:26PM -0500, Mike McLean wrote: > > > >> Furthermore, when the user is root, the 0555 mode will not prevent > >> writing as it would for normal users. >