Re: raising warning flag on firewalld-default feature

2012-11-28 Thread Simon Lukasik
this is with the SCAP > standards team. Which request? Where did I requested something which has been bind to the SCAP? I only asked for an interface in a distribution. Regards, -- Simon Lukasik -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: raising warning flag on firewalld-default feature

2012-11-26 Thread Simon Lukasik
On 11/25/2012 05:12 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 11:43:01AM +0100, Simon Lukasik wrote: >> On 11/22/2012 09:07 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:52:30PM -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote: >>>> Interpreters do not p

Re: raising warning flag on firewalld-default feature

2012-11-23 Thread Simon Lukasik
iguration) shall provide a comprehensive API to query the configuration. > Rich. > -- Simon Lukasik -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Rolling release model philosophy

2012-11-04 Thread Simon Lukasik
On 11/04/2012 04:50 PM, Denis Arnaud wrote: > Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 14:07:02 +0100 > Simon Lukasik wrote: > >> Currently, each Fedora release is kept alive for 13(+/-) months. There >> were dozens of threads about shortening or prolonging period -- but I am >> not

Re: Rolling release model philosophy (was Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID)))

2012-11-04 Thread Simon Lukasik
On 11/04/2012 05:05 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Lukasik writes: >> Currently, each Fedora release is kept alive for 13(+/-) months. There >> were dozens of threads about shortening or prolonging period -- but I am >> not sure if something like the following has been ever di

Re: Rolling release model philosophy (was Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID)))

2012-11-04 Thread Simon Lukasik
alive for 7 months. Each N-th Fedora release -- where N%3==2 -- is alive for 7 months. Each N-th Fedora release -- where N%3==0 -- is alive for 19 months. Additionally, maintainers might be encouraged to push their system wide changes into N%3==1. As well as they might be encouraged to make the Fedor

Re: A software center for Fedora

2011-11-28 Thread Simon Lukasik
at what > they do and learn directly from it. > > Rahul While reading through this thread, I cannot get out of mind the first element of Fedora's mission reads: """ The Fedora Project always strives to lead, not follow. """ -- Simon Lukasik -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel