On Wednesday, April 01 2020, Dan Čermák wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> welcome to the pack!
>
> Kevin Buettner writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> My name is Kevin Buettner.
>>
>> I've been involved in GDB development for over 20 years. I'm an
>> (upstream) GDB global maintainer. I would like to become a
>> co-main
On Monday, April 29 2019, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 29. 04. 19 8:26, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>> This is what wiki says:
>>
>> * |/usr/bin/gdb.minimal| — GDB executable built without optional unneeded
>> features
>> * |/usr/bin/gdb-add-index| — Executable script shared with gdb-headless
>> pac
to Igor as well.
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:ignatenkobrain|Igor Gnatenko]], [[User:sergiodj|Sergio
> Durigan Junior]]
> * Email: ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org, sergi...@sergiodj.net
>
> == Detailed Description ==
> Create subpackage in gdb source package called
>
On Sunday, April 28 2019, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 26. 04. 19 v 23:49 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Minimal_GDB_in_buildroot
>>
>> == Summary ==
>> Create gdb-minimal package (without XML support, Python
>> support, Syntax Highlight and such) and switch to it
On Thursday, April 04 2019, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 04/04/2019 19:49, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>> On Thursday, April 04 2019, Tom Hughes wrote:
>>
>>> On 04/04/2019 19:39, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>>>
>>>> That's awesome, thanks Kevin. A
On Thursday, April 04 2019, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 04/04/2019 19:39, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>
>> That's awesome, thanks Kevin. A while ago I wanted access to an arm32
>> machine running Rawhide, but found that the test machines are
>> unfortunately outdated
On Wednesday, April 03 2019, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> This is a periodic reminder that we have some test instances setup for
> package maintainers. Please see:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Machine_Resources_For_Package_Maintainers
>
> for more information.
>
> Additionally, I
On Monday, March 04 2019, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 04. 03. 19 v 7:36 Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
>> Why is the --setopt parameter needed? Couldn't that be based on
>> $releasever?
>
> For the record - we are speaking about:
>
> --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f30
>
> I spoke to DNF te
On Wednesday, August 08 2018, I wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 08 2018, I wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> libipt v2.0 has been released yesterday and there was an SONAME bump
>> (from 1.6 to 2.0). According to 'dnf repoquery --whatrequires libipt',
>> only two packages depend on it:
>>
>> - GDB
>> - Insight
On Wednesday, August 08 2018, I wrote:
> Hi,
>
> libipt v2.0 has been released yesterday and there was an SONAME bump
> (from 1.6 to 2.0). According to 'dnf repoquery --whatrequires libipt',
> only two packages depend on it:
>
> - GDB
> - Insight
>
> I am the Fedora GDB maintainer and will rebuil
Hi,
libipt v2.0 has been released yesterday and there was an SONAME bump
(from 1.6 to 2.0). According to 'dnf repoquery --whatrequires libipt',
only two packages depend on it:
- GDB
- Insight
I am the Fedora GDB maintainer and will rebuild it now. I am also
Cc'ing the insight maintainer in thi
On Tuesday, July 10 2018, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-07-10 at 15:31 -0400, Marek Polacek wrote:
>> Recently a serious bug in the compiler was discovered whereby we miscompiled
>> several packages. The problem only occurs in C++ programs that contain a
>> class
>> with a trivial move co
On Wednesday, July 04 2018, Jonny Heggheim wrote:
> On 07/04/2018 03:58 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> Yeah, but since it's many thousands of packages, I think maybe you
>> didn't have to send the whole list?
> I like that he sent the whole list, then I can search for my username
> and check if I
On Wednesday, December 20 2017, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> midori is dead upstream. Likely it should be retired, but I keep holding
>> out hope they will revive development. I definitely would not suggest
>> more widespread usage of it.
>
> https://code.launchpad.net/~midori/midor
On Monday, January 12 2015, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> Devel,
>
> I would like to un-retire mumble, but that requires ice.
>
> I've just fixed ice to compile on f21 without much effort.
> So I think I'll un-retire ice and mumble and maintain them
> unless anyone objects.
>
> Is there any reason ice
On Wednesday, July 18 2012, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Please try again now.
>
> I did some tweaking on things and I think it should be much faster
> now.
Indeed, it is faster now. As fast as gitweb, apparently.
Thanks,
--
Sergio
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.
On Monday, July 16 2012, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> cgit is faster.
cgit seems great, but I am not sure it is faster.
sergio@psique /tmp $ time wget
'http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=gdb.git;a=blob;f=gdb-rhbz-818343-set-solib-absolute-prefix-testcase.patch;h=446709da043ef053ee3c65889bdb8438ca
On Thursday, May 31 2012, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 05/31/2012 12:45 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> On 05/31/2012 08:14 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
>> Now /var/tmp should be "more persistent" which we don't need,
> Correct, using /var/tmp is wrong and a mistake.
>
> IMO, advising people to modify the
18 matches
Mail list logo
