Re: Orphaning Packages / Looking for Maintainers

On 09/27/2014 05:13 PM, Sebastian Dziallas wrote: * gstreamer-plugins-espeak * pybox2d * python-elements * python-oauth * sugar-logos * sugar-physics * sugar-tamtam All gone. That was fast. Thanks! Sebastian -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org

Orphaning Packages / Looking for Maintainers

Hi, all. I realize I should have done this a long time ago, but perhaps better now than never. I haven't been around in the Fedora community in a while and it looks like life will keep me busy for the foreseeable future. As a result, I'm looking for maintainers for the following packages in F

Orphaning Typepad Motion (and related) Packages

Hi all, I'm orphaning the following packages, which are all dependencies for Typepad Motion and don't appear to be used by anything else. If you're interested, feel free to pick them up. * typepad-motion * django-flash * django-typepad * python-batchhttp * python-remoteobjects * python-typepa

Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read

On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > [sdz] sugar-tamtam: sugar-tamtam-common-0-0.4.20100201git.fc14.x86_64 This seems to be a false-positive. The activity subpackages all depend on the common package, which itself contains the license file. --Sebastian -- devel mailing

orphaning a few packages

Hi all, since I'll be entering college soon, I'm revisiting my workload (I'll continue to work on Sugar and Etherpad). I'm using neither of the following applications (nodm was originally intended to be used for sugar-related work) and since both avogadro and nodm have a few open bugs which I've b

Looking for Design Suite (Co-) Maintainers

Hi all, I've been the maintainer of the Fedora Design Suite [1] for the past release cycle [2], which has also been part of the F13 talking points [3]. However, I'll be starting college at the end of the summer and I'm suspecting that I might have a little less time then. Hence, I'm looking at han

Re: RawTherapee now GPLv3 -- anyone else interested?

Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:59:32PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 06:36:47PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote: Anyone else interested in working on packaging this? >>> Can it be build and used without the rawzor binary blobs? >> No. That's "Needs Work". >