On Mon, 9 Sep 2024, Richard Fontana wrote:
On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 12:09 PM Dan Horák wrote:
On Mon, 9 Sep 2024 16:24:03 +0200
Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 09. 09. 24 v 4:15 odp. Scott Talbert napsal(a):
On Fri, 6 Sep 2024, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Bellow is list of packages that have
On Fri, 6 Sep 2024, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Bellow is list of packages that have licenses that are neither valid as
Callaway nor as SPDX. I.e. the license cannot be validated neither using
'license-validate' nor using 'license-validate --old'.
swt2c perl-Data-Validate-IP
I recently update
Hi,
Can someone please check this update for mesa? [1]
If I'm reading the results correctly, it seems like it is waiting on
update.server_freeipa_replication_replica for 64bit server, but if you
click on that test, it shows that test passed 3 hours ago.
Thanks,
Scott
[1] https://bodhi.fedor
On Wed, 13 Sep 2023, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 7:02 PM Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 9/13/23 05:23 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
Right. And I want to stress we are not dropping support for X11
applications. Anything running as an X client in a desktop should work
as it has before.
I'm
On Mon, 28 Aug 2023, Mark E. Fuller wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to unretire golang-github-google-renameio-2 and have completed a
re-review.
However, since the package still exists in F37 and F38, the process for
getting the F39 and rawhide branches "back" and getting control of the
package rep
On August 12, 2023 11:17:14 AM EDT, "Mark E. Fuller"
wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>In order to update go-task, I need to unretire branches for F39 and Rawhide of
>https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-google-renameio-2 (and then
>update the package)
>
>It's not clear to me how to proceed sinc
On Fri, 4 Aug 2023, Susi Lehtola wrote:
Hi,
it's been a while since I did active Python packaging. However, one of my
packages, python-qcelemental, https://github.com/MolSSI/QCElemental, has
switched over from setup.py to
$ python -m pip install qcelemental
I did not see anything in the Pyth
On Tue, 25 Jul 2023, Scott Talbert wrote:
libotf was just bumped from libotf.so.0 to libotf.so.1.
$ dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libotf.so.0()(64bit)' --disablerepo='*'
--enablerepo=rawhide
emacs-1:28.2-6.fc39.x86_64
emacs-lucid-1:28.2-6.fc39.x86_64
libotf-devel-0:0.9.13
On Tue, 25 Jul 2023, Scott Talbert wrote:
libotf was just bumped from libotf.so.0 to libotf.so.1.
$ dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libotf.so.0()(64bit)' --disablerepo='*'
--enablerepo=rawhide
emacs-1:28.2-6.fc39.x86_64
emacs-lucid-1:28.2-6.fc39.x86_64
libotf-devel-0:0.9.13
libotf was just bumped from libotf.so.0 to libotf.so.1.
$ dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libotf.so.0()(64bit)' --disablerepo='*'
--enablerepo=rawhide
emacs-1:28.2-6.fc39.x86_64
emacs-lucid-1:28.2-6.fc39.x86_64
libotf-devel-0:0.9.13-22.fc38.x86_64
m17n-lib-tools-0:1.8.2-1.fc39.x86_64
Please annou
On Wed, 19 Jul 2023, Jerry James wrote:
Finally, a replacement for the existing cvc4 package:
cvc5: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223012
I'm happy to take cvc5, since I just packaged it for Debian a little while
back. But yeah, it would be nice to have a working fedora-review.
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 10:45 PM Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
> But that still raises the question - why does it look like this
> started to happen pretty suddenly around June 30?
> The list of updates that were applied to builders in that timeframe
> doesn't raise any alarm bells (except maybe the 6.
On Fri, 16 Jun 2023, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 16. 06. 23 17:16, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jun 2023, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hi, I have the python-qcengine package, which is not rebuilt by python
3.12 yet.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-qcengine
Hello. This is waiting for
On Fri, 16 Jun 2023, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hi, I have the python-qcengine package, which is not rebuilt by python 3.12
yet.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-qcengine
Hello. This is waiting for:
python-qcelemental
python-pint
Which is waiting for:
python-matplotlib
python
On Fri, 26 May 2023, Richard Shaw wrote:
On a side note I love the packager dashboard!
I noticed that OpenColorIO builds in rawhide were failing[1] and took a look
at the logs and the errors seem to be around doxygen:
In file included
from/builddir/build/BUILD/OpenColorIO-2.2.1/src/bindings/py
On Mon, 17 Apr 2023, Steve Dickson wrote:
Hello,
I'm getting a very strange mock error [1] on a package [2]
that was recently ported to python 3.
The package builds fine locally... only fails in a
scratch build... and that function that the error is c
complaining about does not exist in the pa
On Tue, 7 Mar 2023, Betty Liu wrote:
Hi, I'm a beginner at fedora packaging and following the guide in the
documentation.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
I'm using CentOS stream 8 and I've downloaded the source code of yellow. In the
same directory, I've made the spe
On Wed, 22 Feb 2023, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Julian Sikorski wrote:
FTBFS bug was filed against mame [1]. Unfortunately, the corresponding
build [2] has already been deleted. This is not ideal from maintainer
perspective as it effectively is a bug with no info provided whatsoever.
Not to
Hi all,
Just a heads-up, I'm planning to retire wxGTK3 (wxWidgets 3.0) on March 1.
(I was hoping to do it before F38 branched, but that didn't happen.)
wxWidgets 3.0 is no longer maintained and 3.2 is now the current stable
version. Almost all Fedora packages have been migrated to wxWidgets
On Thu, 9 Feb 2023, Ian McInerney via devel wrote:
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 2:30 PM Scott Talbert wrote:
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023, Brandon Nielsen via devel wrote:
> On 2/8/23 9:30 PM, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
>> wxGTK should have that...
>
> It should,
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023, Brandon Nielsen via devel wrote:
On 2/8/23 9:30 PM, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
wxGTK should have that...
It should, and they fixed it, but the fix never made it to the 3.1.X series
as far as I can tell. 3.2.1 in F37 at least builds, but for some reason
liblibnyquist.so i
This is a non-responsive maintainer check for andymenderunix (Andy
Mender). Does anyone know how to contact Andy?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2166645
Thanks,
Scott
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
On Thu, 22 Dec 2022, Ian McInerney via devel wrote:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 1:55 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
I just had a chance to check out a bug[1] recently submitted
against trustedqsl and it appears that a new version of wxGTK
with a SONAME bump was built for f37+ but not a
On Thu, 22 Dec 2022, Richard Shaw wrote:
I just had a chance to check out a bug[1] recently submitted against
trustedqsl and it appears that a new version of wxGTK with a SONAME bump was
built for f37+ but not all dependencies rebuilt.
I'm not too worried about trustedqsl since I'm about to tak
On Sun, 27 Nov 2022, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Scott Talbert wrote on 2022/11/24 2:23:
Hi all,
In order to fix some incompatibilities with wxWidgets wxGLCanvas (which is
currently built with OpenGL EGL support) and several package users which
are expecting OpenGL GLX support, I need to rebuild
Hi all,
In order to fix some incompatibilities with wxWidgets wxGLCanvas (which is
currently built with OpenGL EGL support) and several package users which
are expecting OpenGL GLX support, I need to rebuild wxWidgets with a
different configuration option. Unfortunately, this results in an AB
> I just upgraded my system to Fedora 37 and noticed that the package "hackrf"
> was
> still from Fedora 36. I found a failed build from the f37-rebuild, dated
> 2022-07-21 [1].
> It apparently failed on aarch64, but the logs are long gone - at least I
> don't see
> them on koji.
>
> I tried
On Sat, 12 Nov 2022, Sergey Mende wrote:
Hi,
during development of my own project I hit the bug in `gdb` that is already
fixed upstream but not backported to rawhide yet.
I did a backport and ready to submit a PR. What is the right way to proceed:
a) just file a PR;
b) open a bug in bugzilla,
On Thu, 10 Nov 2022, Ben Beasley wrote:
In one week (2022-11-17), or slightly later, I will update python-pytest-bdd
from version 5.0.0 to version 6.1.1[1] in Rawhide. This will bring
significant API-breaking changes[2] from 5.x.
The sole dependent package, jrnl, does not support version 6.x yet
This is a non-responsive maintainer check for mikedep333 (Michael
DePaulo). Does anyone know how to contact this maintainer?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2134659
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe sen
This is a non-responsive maintainer check for ivazquez (Ignacio
Vazquez-Abrams). Does anyone know how to contact this user?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2134660
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
This is a non-responsive maintainer check for volter (Volker Fröhlich).
Does anyone know how to contact this user?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2134665___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email t
This a non-responsive maintainer check for wolfy (manuel wolfshant).
Does anyone know how to contact this maintainer?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2134664
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an ema
On 2022-10-02 20:07, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Hi,
with the wxWidgets 3.2.0 release, there is now finally a wxQt backend
available. Are there any plans yet to package that?
I don't have any current plans to package it. Though the wxQt port
exists, as far as I can see, it isn't as well ma
On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/16/22 09:29 AM, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/15/22 08:38 PM, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Sat, 13 Aug 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/12/22 11:35 AM, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/12/22 11:00 AM, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2022, Steven A
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022, Martin Gansser wrote:
Sorry i ment F36/F37.
You didn't answer whether you see the same problem on F38. Have you tried
it there?
Never mind - I tried it there and do observ
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022, Martin Gansser wrote:
Sorry i ment F36/F37.
You didn't answer whether you see the same problem on F38. Have you tried it
there?
Never mind - I tried it there and do observe the same problem.
On Sat, 13 Aug 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/12/22 11:35 AM, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/12/22 11:00 AM, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
It turns out that there is a bug in wxPython whereby it installs an
error handler that should not be installed by a
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022, Martin Gansser wrote:
Sorry i ment F36/F37.
You didn't answer whether you see the same problem on F38. Have you tried
it there?
Scott
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dev
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022, Martin Gansser wrote:
Hi,
since i started guayadeque to compile with wxsqlite3-4.8.2-5.fc36.x86_64 and
wxGTK-3.1.5-6.fc36.x86_64 compile, the program starts on F37/F38 with the
following error message:
../src/generic/imaglist.cpp(44): assert "m_size != wxSize(0, 0)" faile
On Fri, 12 Aug 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
It turns out that there is a bug in wxPython whereby it installs an error
handler that should not be installed by a library [1]. KiCad can work
around that by adding a compile flag to disable its own error handler [2].
Credit to Ian for identifying
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/9/22 06:00 PM, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/9/22 05:06 PM, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/9/22 02:25 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/9/22 01:09 PM, Scott Talbert
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/9/22 05:06 PM, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/9/22 02:25 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/9/22 01:09 PM, Scott Talbert wrote:
Hi,
Upstream wxPython has finally made a new release and this involves
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/9/22 02:25 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/9/22 01:09 PM, Scott Talbert wrote:
Hi,
Upstream wxPython has finally made a new release and this involves
migrating to wxWidgets 3.2.0 at the same time. I'm planning to build the
new wxPyth
Hi,
Upstream wxPython has finally made a new release and this involves
migrating to wxWidgets 3.2.0 at the same time. I'm planning to build the
new wxPython in Rawhide after F37 branch (although could put it in F37
later).
For those packages that use both wxPython and wxWidgets (I *think* t
On Mon, 25 Jul 2022, Scott Talbert wrote:
At long last wxWidgets 3.2.0 has been released and I'm getting it into
Rawhide. This comes with an soname bump (but this should be the last one as
3.2.x should now be ABI stable).
NOTE: users of wxWidgets 3.0 (wxGTK3 package) are now str
On Tue, 26 Jul 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
At long last wxWidgets 3.2.0 has been released and I'm getting it into
Rawhide. This comes with an soname bump (but this should be the last one
as 3.2.x should now be ABI stable).
NOTE: users of wxWidgets 3.0 (wxGTK3 package) are now strongly encou
At long last wxWidgets 3.2.0 has been released and I'm getting it into
Rawhide. This comes with an soname bump (but this should be the last one
as 3.2.x should now be ABI stable).
NOTE: users of wxWidgets 3.0 (wxGTK3 package) are now strongly encouraged
to move their packages to use wxWidgets
On Tue, 21 Jun 2022, Ron Olson wrote:
Hey all-
Koschei is sending me an email warning me that Nethack builds started to
fail in Rawhide[1], but it seems that it successfully built after that, so
why is it still sending the emails? Is there something I have to acknowledge
or clear to make the e
On Fri, 10 Jun 2022, Dominik Mierzejewski wrote:
Hi, Scott.
On Friday, 10 June 2022 at 16:43, Scott Talbert wrote:
Hi,
I'm updating wxGTK to 3.1.7 in Rawhide - this involves an soname bump.
I've created side tag f37-build-side-54462 to perform the build with its
dependencies.
On Fri, 10 Jun 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 6/10/22 10:43 AM, Scott Talbert wrote:
Hi,
I'm updating wxGTK to 3.1.7 in Rawhide - this involves an soname bump.
I've created side tag f37-build-side-54462 to perform the build with its
dependencies.
I've built wxGTK, CubicS
Hi,
I'm updating wxGTK to 3.1.7 in Rawhide - this involves an soname bump.
I've created side tag f37-build-side-54462 to perform the build with its
dependencies.
I've built wxGTK, CubicSDR and audacity in the side tag.
@rathann, can you please build wxmacmolplt in the f37-build-side-54462
s
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Hi, Scott.
On Tuesday, 12 April 2022 at 05:38, Scott Talbert wrote:
I'm in the process of updating wxGTK to 3.1.6 in Rawhide. This comes with
an soname bump. I've built wxGTK 3.1.6 in a side tag, f37-build-side
Hello,
I'm in the process of updating wxGTK to 3.1.6 in Rawhide. This comes with
an soname bump. I've built wxGTK 3.1.6 in a side tag, f37-build-side-52676.
The dependent packages are:
CubicSDR -> already rebuilding in side tag
audacity -> already rebuilding in side tag
wxmacmolplt -> needs
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022, Paul DeStefano wrote:
Greetings. I just joined devel, following directions I found on how to
become maintainer of an orphaned package. I'm interested in helping
resurrect 'remind', last packaged for F29. I've been using it, ran into
a problem, needed a newer version, and
On Wed, 2 Mar 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
I just tried to connect to copr [1] with firefox, and got a "Did Not Connect:
Potential Security Issue" error.
And apparently copr uses HSTS, so I cannot override it. Is anyone else
having the problem?
[1] https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/g/ki
On Tue, 11 Jan 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
Hi all,
This is mostly targeted at maintainers (bcc'd in case not subscribed to
Fedora devel) of packages that depend on wxPython (aka python3-wxpython4).
TL;DR: if your package uses python3-wxpython4, please test it with the
python3-wxpython4 fro
Hi all,
This is mostly targeted at maintainers (bcc'd in case not subscribed to
Fedora devel) of packages that depend on wxPython (aka python3-wxpython4).
TL;DR: if your package uses python3-wxpython4, please test it with the
python3-wxpython4 from this COPR [1] and provide me any feedback, p
On Sun, 26 Dec 2021, Barry Scott wrote:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 5:16 AM Barry Scott
wrote:
I have added a patch for the spec file for
python-tzlocal.spec
that allows the 4.1 release to build.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993583
I can raise a PR if
On Fri, 17 Dec 2021, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Does anyone know how to contact them? Direct email and bug reports have
had no response.
His twitter profile points at a few contact options as a last resort.
https://twitter.com/bpepple
Sorry, I don't use Twitter. If someone wants to reach out
Hi,
This is a non-responsive maintainer check for bpepple.
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free has FTBFS in Rawhide for ~1 month. I
submitted a PR with a fix on Nov 22, but there has been zero response:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free/pull-request/7
https://bugzilla.re
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021, Steven A. Falco wrote:
I also noticed that python3-wxpython4 appears to require the 3.0 branch, so
that might be what is causing both 3.0 and 3.1 of wxGTK to be dragged in:
$ rpm -q --requires python3-wxpython4
...
libwx_baseu-3.0.so.0()(64bit)
...
Is there a version of p
Hi @eclipseo,
Looks like jpegxl soname was bumped, breaking a bunch of stuff:
2021-11-21 20:20:51
Package resolution failed
Problem: package gd-2.3.3-3.fc36.x86_64 requires
libavif.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- package graphviz-2.49.3-2.fc36.x86_64 requir
On Fri, 12 Nov 2021, Martin Stransky wrote:
Hi folks,
I was told that people were having trouble with Firefox/HW
acceleration/VA-API setup on Fedora so I put some info at wiki at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Firefox_Hardware_acceleration
Along these lines, I am experiencing a pretty big
I'm orphaning poco: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/poco
I'm not sure why I picked it up originally - I don't use it. It currently
FTBFS in rawhide due to OpenSSL 3.0 (and can't be fixed easily by going
back to OpenSSL 1.1 because one of its other BR's requires OpenSSL 3.0).
Nothing in Fe
On Mon, 16 Aug 2021, Brian C. Lane wrote:
There's a bug with pycdlib that has been fixed upstream. I've been
trying to get the author/maintainer's attention but to no avail.
I've even made and tested a PR for it here:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pycdlib/pull-request/2
This effect
On Wed, 4 Aug 2021, Steven A. Falco wrote:
I decided to file a bug here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988466
I also saw a similar issue and added a comment here:
https://github.com/wxWidgets/Phoenix/issues/1963
Yeah, I'll try to look into it later today.
In case anyone was
On Fri, 30 Jul 2021, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jul 2021, Steven A. Falco wrote:
I decided to file a bug here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988466
I also saw a similar issue and added a comment here:
https://github.com/wxWidgets/Phoenix/issues/1963
Yeah, I'll t
On Fri, 30 Jul 2021, Steven A. Falco wrote:
I decided to file a bug here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988466
I also saw a similar issue and added a comment here:
https://github.com/wxWidgets/Phoenix/issues/1963
Yeah, I'll try to look into it later today.
Scott
On Fri, 23 Jul 2021, Scott Talbert wrote:
Per the Fedora 35 schedule[1] we will start a mass rebuild for Fedora 35
on Jul 21st, 2021. We will run a mass rebuild for Fedora 35 for the
changes listed in:
https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open&tags=mass+rebuild
The mass rebuild will be
On Fri, 23 Jul 2021, Fabio Valentini wrote:
Per the Fedora 35 schedule[1] we will start a mass rebuild for Fedora 35
on Jul 21st, 2021. We will run a mass rebuild for Fedora 35 for the
changes listed in:
https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open&tags=mass+rebuild
The mass rebuild will be don
On Wed, 21 Jul 2021, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
Hi all,
Per the Fedora 35 schedule[1] we will start a mass rebuild for Fedora 35
on Jul 21st, 2021. We will run a mass rebuild for Fedora 35 for the
changes listed in:
https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open&tags=mass+rebuild
The mass rebuild will b
On Mon, 12 Jul 2021, Richard Shaw wrote:
Currently I can't use my Fedora login on release-monitoring.org...
Error: There was an error during authentication 'Authentication process
canceled', please check the provided url.
Is this a known problem?
It just worked for me, so doesn't seem to be a
On July 5, 2021 6:11:07 PM EDT, "Miro Hrončok" wrote:
>On 05. 07. 21 16:58, Scott Talbert wrote:
>> On Mon, 21 Jun 2021, Scott Talbert wrote:
>>
>>>> Just a heads-up, I've been working on converting packages from sip
>4 to sip
>>>> 5 i
On Mon, 21 Jun 2021, Scott Talbert wrote:
Just a heads-up, I've been working on converting packages from sip 4 to sip
5 in Rawhide. (sip is the Python bindings generation system used by PyQt
and wxPython.)
I'm planning on opening pull requests against the affected packages soon.
On Thu, 24 Jun 2021, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Hello team,
I am not sure why Blender failed to build recently. It seems some changes in
the repository affect the buildand
I am unable to find the cause. Can someone investigate please?
The build in question is on
https://download.copr.fedorain
On Wed, 16 Jun 2021, Scott Talbert wrote:
Just a heads-up, I've been working on converting packages from sip 4 to sip 5
in Rawhide. (sip is the Python bindings generation system used by PyQt and
wxPython.)
I'm planning on opening pull requests against the affected packages soon.
On Wed, 16 Jun 2021, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
Hi,
Just a heads-up, I've been working on converting packages from sip 4 to
sip 5 in Rawhide. (sip is the Python bindings generation system used by
PyQt and wxPython.)
I see we have Qt6, but not PyQt6, in Fedora 34. Is this what's
requir
Hi,
Just a heads-up, I've been working on converting packages from sip 4 to
sip 5 in Rawhide. (sip is the Python bindings generation system used by
PyQt and wxPython.)
I'm planning on opening pull requests against the affected packages soon.
Please DO NOT merge these PRs yet - they need to
On Sun, 30 May 2021, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote:
Long story short: I have a Python package ("cozy") which built fine in koji, but failed to build
locally - or rather, it built fine, but then caused pytest-3 to crash. After a bit of fiddling, I managed to
nail this down to having "python3-fake
On Thu, 6 May 2021, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
I'm updating wxWidgets (wxGTK package) to v3.1.5 in Rawhide. This includes
a soname bump. I'm doing the build in a side tag: f35-build-side-40779.
As far as I can tell, the only users are CubicSDR and audacity. I'll
rebuild CubicSDR.
On Wed, 5 May 2021, Steven A. Falco wrote:
Hi,
I'm updating wxWidgets (wxGTK package) to v3.1.5 in Rawhide. This includes
a soname bump. I'm doing the build in a side tag: f35-build-side-40779.
As far as I can tell, the only users are CubicSDR and audacity. I'll
rebuild CubicSDR. Gwyn o
Hi,
I'm updating wxWidgets (wxGTK package) to v3.1.5 in Rawhide. This
includes a soname bump. I'm doing the build in a side tag:
f35-build-side-40779.
As far as I can tell, the only users are CubicSDR and audacity. I'll
rebuild CubicSDR. Gwyn or Ian, can you please take care of rebuildin
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I'd be able and willing to assist here too, thanks for working on it!
As far as sip6 goes, I'd venture the adjustment from v5 to v6 will be
smaller than what v4 to v5 was.
Yeah, agreed.
Happy to work with you both and get this done. :)
Okay, I'll wor
On Sat, 24 Apr 2021, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 10:42:28PM -0500, Scott Talbert wrote:
OK, I'm going to make an attempt to move python-qt5 (and its friends) to
sip5. I'm planning to build everything in a copr first.
Hey Scott.
Did you get any further with this?
On Mon, 4 Jan 2021, Rex Dieter wrote:
I think fundamentally the version of PyQt5-sip probably needs to match
(or be very close to) the version of sip that PyQt5 itself was
compiled with.
I think for calibre (which is currently failing with):
...
/usr/bin/python3 -c import os;
os.chdir('/build
On Mon, 11 Jan 2021, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote:
I didn't realize sip5 provided the python bindings, but it does. The build
still fails:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6643/59456643/build.log
Looks like you're still using sip4? /usr/bin/sip is sip4. sip5 is
/usr/bin/sip5.
On Mon, 11 Jan 2021, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote:
python3-sip-4.19.24 seems too old for python3-poppler-qt5 21.1.0, and
sip5 seems to lack python bindings. What's the best plan to resolve
this?
What do you mean by "sip5 seems to lack python bindings?"
Scott
__
On Mon, 4 Jan 2021, Rex Dieter wrote:
I think fundamentally the version of PyQt5-sip probably needs to match
(or be very close to) the version of sip that PyQt5 itself was
compiled with.
I think for calibre (which is currently failing with):
...
/usr/bin/python3 -c import os;
os.chdir('/build
On Sat, 2 Jan 2021, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I think fundamentally the version of PyQt5-sip probably needs to match (or
be very close to) the version of sip that PyQt5 itself was compiled with.
I think for calibre (which is currently failing with):
...
/usr/bin/python3 -c import os;
os.chdir('/bui
On Thu, 31 Dec 2020, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I think fundamentally the version of PyQt5-sip probably needs to match (or
be very close to) the version of sip that PyQt5 itself was compiled with.
I think for calibre (which is currently failing with):
...
/usr/bin/python3 -c import os;
os.chdir('/bu
On Wed, 30 Dec 2020, Scott Talbert wrote:
Neal and I are looking at getting ButterManager packaged, and it
depends on sip and PyQt5-sip:
https://github.com/egara/buttermanager/blob/master/requirements.txt
Now, this is where things get a bit odd:
- the current sip (4.19.24) does not have
On Wed, 30 Dec 2020, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Hi all,
Neal and I are looking at getting ButterManager packaged, and it
depends on sip and PyQt5-sip:
https://github.com/egara/buttermanager/blob/master/requirements.txt
Now, this is where things get a bit odd:
- the current sip (4.19.24) d
On Sat, 12 Dec 2020, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Starting from version 3.5.0 the python-pytest-randomly package has
changed license from BSD to MIT. I will build this update for rawhide
shortly.
I first read that as "python-pytest randomly changing license from BSD to MIT"
;)
I did t
On Sun, 25 Oct 2020, Scott Talbert wrote:
Has this been fixed in rawhide yet? I'm still getting this when
running fedora-review:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/dnf", line 57, in
from dnf.cli import main
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/dn
On Sat, 24 Oct 2020, Florian Weimer wrote:
Has this been fixed in rawhide yet? I'm still getting this when
running fedora-review:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/dnf", line 57, in
from dnf.cli import main
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/dnf/__init__.py", line
Has this been fixed in rawhide yet? I'm still getting this when running
fedora-review:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/dnf", line 57, in
from dnf.cli import main
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/dnf/__init__.py", line 30, in
import dnf.base
File "/usr/lib/
On Fri, 11 Sep 2020, ycollette.nos...@free.fr wrote:
Just a mail to say I fixed the seq24 spec file.
It works fine on Fedora 31 / 32 for now.
Here is the bug report where I put the links to the fixed spec file:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1675986#c14
Hi,
Unfortunately, it app
On Wed, 19 Aug 2020, Christopher wrote:
So, just to be absolutely clear... I can remove the file, just do
epel8 as normal, and completely ignore the epel8-playground branch
forever?
As best as I can tell, yes. I have at least one package in epel8 that
doesn't have the package.cfg and it work
On Wed, 19 Aug 2020, Christopher wrote:
1. Do I need epel8-playground? I want to keep the task of maintenance
simple, and I don't want to deal with another branch to think about. I
don't want choices, as that adds complexity. I want one simple path,
because packaging is *not* my full time job.
1 - 100 of 221 matches
Mail list logo
