On 03/02/2016 06:50 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Hello All!
I'd like to ask you for advice. I've packaged an application which can
use external CLI tools (not available in Fedora for various non-legal
reasons). Shall I remove support for these tools or better keep it?
The answer is "it depends".
On 02/22/2016 05:34 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 22 February 2016 at 13:00, Ralf Senderek wrote:
The Fedora team could get a profile and verify the key(s) through
github, the Fedora and Red Hat web sites, the Fedora magazine twitter
account, and by having the Fedora team all sign public
On 02/22/2016 02:22 PM, Ralf Senderek wrote:
If the site is compromised, most bets are off sadly.
Yes, for people who look only in one place, the manipulated web server.
But that is the reason why the fingerprint has to pop up in different places
where it is hard to fake. Even if this one use
On 10/15/2015 03:30 PM, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:54:29AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
same python version as the Ansible version you're using. If Ansible were to
use python3, all module bindings would need to be python 3, and *all the
managed machines would need t
On 08/01/2015 03:25 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 10:40:45AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 17:28:48 +
>> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>>
>>> [In light of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241383]
>>>
>>> 'dnf install --inst
On 06/01/2015 01:55 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>>>>>> "RSB" == Ryan S Brown writes:
>
> RSB> I disagree; for server & cloud deployments it doesn't make sense to
> RSB> duplicate a DNS server on *every* host, and if you care about
>
On 06/01/2015 10:37 AM, Tomas Hozza wrote:
> On 06/01/2015 03:32 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 08:03:27AM -0400, Jan Kurik wrote:
>>> People use Fedora on portable/mobile devices which are connected to
>>> diverse networks as and when required. The automatic DNS
>>> configura
there should be upgrade to
> version 2.6.7-4 ASAP
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8949655
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8949651
Thanks for fixing this so quickly, much appreciated.
> Marek
>
> Ryan S. Brown píše v Pá 13. 02. 2015 v 08
On 02/13/2015 11:25 AM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> "Ryan S. Brown" writes:
>
>> [...] In January, the Fedora rawhide package for mongo[2] was
>> changed to listen on all interfaces by default [...] To help
>> protect users, I think the default should be
Hello,
After reading this article[1] on how many totally unsecured mongodb
installations there are on the internet, I noticed a recent (and
worrying) change in the defaults on Fedora's mongodb package.
In January, the Fedora rawhide package for mongo[2] was changed to
listen on all interfaces by
On 02/10/2015 09:16 AM, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-02-10 at 14:38 +0100, Marek Skalický wrote:
>> Matthew Miller píše v Út 10. 02. 2015 v 06:19 -0500:
>>> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:12:15PM +0100, Marek Skalický wrote:
does someone know what are Fedora Guidelines (or something similar)
On 01/21/2015 03:17 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 20.1.2015 v 17:44 Jason Rist napsal(a):
>> On 01/20/2015 08:01 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>> Hi everybody,
>>>
>>> Just heads up that Ruby 2.2 landed in Rawhide. We tried to rebuild every
>>> package which depends on ruby-devel and libruby.so so most of
On 10/16/2014 09:32 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>
> There are no Django applications that are part of the install sets of
> any of the Products or Spins so far as I am aware, so the risk to the
> Project deliverable dates would be minimal. I'd suggest bringing it to
> FESCo for a more complete
Hello all,
My name is Ryan Brown. I'm a long-time user of Fedora and have recently
begun contributing to Openstack Heat. Heat is [1] a system for
describing and reproducing infrastructure in Openstack, roughly
equivalent to AWS CloudFormation.
I'm not yet in the packagers group, but I will b
14 matches
Mail list logo
