Sandro Mani wrote:
>This is most likely due to the fact that mingw-crt-12.0.0 for the
>mingw32 and mingw64 variants was initially built with the incorrect
>default msvcrt. This has since been fixed, but mingw-gcc also needs to
>be rebuilt. I'm taking care of this now.
Is it also necessary to r
Owen,
Thanks for explaining the situation with umask. I'd noticed the
discrepancy between login/non-login shells and wondered what was
going on.
>It seems like we need to do one of two things:
>
> - Go back to the old behavior, maybe by using the usergroups option to
>pam_umask and removing the
Marc-André Lureau wrote:
>FYI, UCRT can be installed on various Windows:
>https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/update-for-universal-c-runtime-in-windows-c0514201-7fe6-95a3-b0a5-287930f3560c
Sure, it *can* be. But that doesn't mean I can rely on my end users
to be able to do that. Currently
Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 05:17:29PM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
>>
>> But yes, for Windows releases ≥ 95 OSR 2 and < 10 (and no, Windows version
>> numbers are not anywhere near monotonic ;-) ), MSVCRT is included out of the
>> box, UCRT is not. Is it really a good
Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
>* Ron Yorston [13/02/2019 08:45] :
>> If so, why would they do that? Why would they *not* want their package
>> to be available as a regular package? It seems counterproductive for
>> them to downgrade their package to this second-class status.
>
Neal Gompa wrote:
>Ron Yorston wrote:
>> What is a "module-only" package?
>
>These are packages that move from the main Fedora distribution into
>the addon "fedora-modular" repo that is enabled by default on Fedora
>systems.
What causes a package
Fabio Valentini wrote:
>In the past few weeks, it has come up regularly that future
>"module-only" packages are orphaned (and hence will soon be retired),
>and nobody stepped up to fix this issue - especially for non-leaf
>packages. I don't think fedora as a project has a solution for this
>yet.
W
Adam Williamson wrote:
>On Sun, 2018-09-02 at 08:58 -0700, stan wrote:
>> On Sun, 2 Sep 2018 09:33:39 +0200
>> Andreas Tunek wrote:
>>
>> > There is no root acoount on a default F29 installation. Also, you
>> > can't see the boot menu and I haven't been able to trigger it.
>>
>> Whoa! I'm not s
Rich,
Thanks for packaging zerofree. It's been great to be able to install
my own software without having to build it.
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>zerofree is a package that can take an ext2 (only?) filesystem, work
>out what parts of the filesystem are not used, and either zero them or
>sparsify
Hans de Goede wrote:
>I plan to use 1 subpackage per extension of the frippery
>extension collection, so that people can install only those
>which they want without automatically getting all of
>them.
I'd prefer them to be in one package: they are intended to work
together.
I understand that mana
10 matches
Mail list logo
