> logcheck → needs to be checked
It will break by this change.
I was not able to make it work on two machines. My system is cursed and
containers does not have such logs at all. Going to check on fresh VM.
However I was able to dive in the code and check how it works. It is
basically big collect
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> i call your infrastructure scattered around the globe the minority of setups
This can be the case for Fedora but it would be not for CentOS and RHEL,
where this change should head in too.
> "there is a simple way to change the format if you
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> When some package will break because someone adjusted format of
>> timestamps, the bug is in that package and not in the rsyslog's format
>
> there is a world outside packages called user scripts
That is true. But here there is simple way t
Thanks, Stephen, I will update the "Benefit to Fedora" section.
> It does not inspire confidence that the person(s) proposing this Change
> understand the potential fallout.
...
> what packages in Fedora parse the rsyslog output and make sure that they are
> capable of handling the change.
Ev
IMHO it is exactly as Björn replied to you. Between 2010 and 2014 I was working
in aerospace where the exact time of an event is of the highest importance. In
this field there is deep understanding (based on several
hundreds-millions-dollars screwups) how much compliance to standards is
importa
Done. Thank you, Zbyszek!
Roman
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
What was deciding factor for us was "Complex system wide changes involve
system-wide defaults" in Changes/Policy. Also I consider system logging
facility system-wide important. And as another Bjorn replies below, there may
be packages dependent on current format.
Best regards
Roman
___
