Hello,
does somebody know how to contact Steven Roberts? Yes, two requests are for
EPEL 9, but I would be even happy to maintain the EPEL branch(es) myself in
case of a negative response.
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974006
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072993
Hello,
does somebody know how to contact Athmane Madjoudj? Yes, one of my requests
is for EPEL, but I would be even happy to maintain the EPEL branches myself
in case of a negative response.
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902857#c2
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2
Hello,
does somebody know how to contact Peter Gordon? I am aware that my request
is for EPEL, but I would be even happy to maintain the EPEL branches myself
in case of a negative response.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1990157
I also filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cg
On Sun, 11 Apr 2021, Robert Scheck wrote:
> Anyway, as long as systemd-boot upstream does not seem to care much about
> whether vfat XBOOTLDR is working at all (even an EfiFs driver is loaded by
> UEFI itself; their own internal UEFI driver loader is not yet implemented),
> a disc
On Sun, 11 Apr 2021, Neal Gompa wrote:
> To be absolutely clear, I completely agree with everything here.
> However, with GRUB being completely dysfunctional upstream and all the
> pressure from everyone else basically doing nothing, I don't know what
> else we're supposed to do. Outside of Fedora,
On Sat, 10 Apr 2021, Neal Gompa wrote:
> We do have those packaged in Fedora: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/efifs
>
> The GRUB2 sources being used as an input is wrong, though. It should
> be using the ones from the rhboot fork:
> https://github.com/rhboot/grub2/commits/fedora-35
I am sorry,
I've submitted an update for adplug yesterday for all released branches of
Fedora (and EPEL), because it addresses 8 CVEs.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?search=adplug-2.3.3
The API is compatible (but ABI bump), so it will just require a rebuild for
dependent packages. Given only two
Hello,
On Mon, 21 Dec 2020, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Slaanesh is still active. The best way to contact him is through e-mail.
even the RHBZs should already have lead to e-mails, I'm trying it directly
as suggested: Please respond to libtelnet vs. EPEL 8:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.
Hello all,
given the lack of any response over a timeframe of 1+ months at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896375
for libtelnet, I am hereby starting (as suggested by Stephen Smoogen at
Freenode IRC #fedora-apps) week #0 of
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_fo
Hello Tomas,
On Thu, 04 Apr 2019, Tomas Krizek wrote:
> This makes it difficult to search for lua packages and preferably, there
> should be just a single naming scheme. Based on a discussion with
> maintainer of lua-lpeg and lua-mpack [2], we've agreed to use the naming
> scheme compat-lua-*
wou
Hello all,
as per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL:Packaging#Limited_Arch_Packages
I would like to notify you about my intention to add the libssh package to
EPEL 7 to cover aarch64, ppc64 and ppc64le architectures, which are not
covered with that package by RHEL 7 (RHEL 7 currently just covers
Hello Richard,
On Sun, 18 Feb 2018, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> If you wish to take it over, I can orphan it instead.
I'm happy to take zerofree.
Regards,
Robert
pgpCajlfkSZiz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fe
On Sun, 18 Feb 2018, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> There's also a more serious data safety issue: Although this probably
> works OK for ext2 since that format is frozen in time, it probably
> corrupts ext4 filesystems containing features that it doesn't know
> about.
>
> It is for these reasons that
Hello David,
On Tue, 09 Aug 2016, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-07-29 at 15:26 +0200, Ondřej Lysoněk wrote:
> Hm, does it have a pkg-config file? If it did, then the BuildRequires
> of affected packages should be something like.
no, unfortunately not. The package has two include files an
Hello Adam,
On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Adam Jackson wrote:
> As a quick audit (based on 'grep _initrddir' and 'grep _initddir' over
> a fairly recent checkout of the spec files in pkg git, and then some
> manual inspection) I think the following packages will be affected:
your grep calls should include
On Fri, 23 Jan 2015, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> There's one issue we are looking into to be aware of, builds now give:
> SysCallError: (-1, 'Unexpected EOF')
> instead of watching the build you just started. The build is running
> fine and you can follow it on the web interface. Hopefully we will push
>
Hello Jiri,
On Mon, 25 Nov 2013, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> Although it is more then nice to have giflib 5 in rawhide, I would
> encourage you to untag[1] it from rawhide, and prepare doubled packages
> in koji to give dependent packages time to rebuilt:
the new giflib is untagged now. I am sorry for
Hello Sérgio,
On Sat, 19 Oct 2013, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> you already have a propose to update to 4.0.x in
> http://anshprat.fedorapeople.org/rhbz959946/c12/
do not only read https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959946#c12 but
also the other comments below - please.
Greetings,
Robert
Hello,
On Sat, 19 Oct 2013, Reindl Harald wrote:
> what is needed to be resolved?
>
> my SPEC file is removing all the things i do not need and
> not things with bugs to solve - the reason why i build it
> myself honestly since years is that the fedora packages
> are way too often outdated
if yo
Hello Sérgio,
On Sat, 19 Oct 2013, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> I use often and for me is an essential tool, I wish be maintainer of the
> package , I already requested commit permissions in acls , but nothing
> happen until now .
can you please provide any patches for review (e.g. via RHBZ) before jus
On Sat, 19 Oct 2013, Reindl Harald wrote:
> and as user i am asking you as phpMyAdmin maintainer why are
> you not keep the package up-to-date - they have a mailing list
> with release announcements, however i maintain my personal one
It would make more sense to help *solving* the open issues rath
Hello Paul,
On Wed, 09 Oct 2013, Paul Wouters wrote:
> I'm not a really user of phpMyAdmin so if someone who actually uses
> this package wishes to take maintainership, please do!
you noticed, that you pushed yet another version of phpMyAdmin with a *.swf
file that is somehow "proprietary" becaus
Hallo Dave,
On Sat, 28 Sep 2013, Dave Johansen wrote:
> I just noticed that the boost141 package had been previously available in
> Fedora, but it has since been removed (
> https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5291 ). I'm not familiar with the
> recent changes in Boost, but is the API stable e
Hello guys,
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> xorriso [1] is deprecated because now it's a subpackage of libisoburn [2].
please orphan xorriso immediately (if not already done so). The variant of
xorriso that libisoburn ships does not contain any bundled libraries, while
the stand-
Hello Deji,
On Mon, 09 Aug 2010, Deji Akingunola wrote:
> While the truth is you never contacted me by email, and you went ahead
> threatening me with AWOL policy and orphaning all my packages just 2
> weeks after filing a bug for package upgrade on EPEL 4.
thank you very much for your reply. In
Hi,
as per non-responsive maintainer policy at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
I have filed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600992
Does somebody know how to contact Deji Akingunola? I've been unsuccessful
via e-mail and Red Hat Bugzi
Good evening,
On Sun, 16 May 2010, Robert Scheck wrote:
> as per non-responsive maintainer policy at
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
>
> I have filed:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588053
>
>
://search.cpan.org/dist/%{pkgname}/
@@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man?/Convert::UUlib*
%changelog
+* Fri Apr 30 2010 Marcela Maslanova - 1:1.33-2
+- Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0
+
* Sun Mar 28 2010 Robert Scheck 1:1.33-1
- Upgrade to 1.33
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http
Hi,
as per non-responsive maintainer policy at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
I have filed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588053
Does somebody know how to contact Subhodip Biswas? I've been unsuccessful
via e-mail and Red Hat Bugzi
Hello folks,
the upstream of unicap splitted the unicap package into libunicap, libucil
and libunicapgtk. On run-time they're 100% compatible with unicap, but only
all three new packages together replace the previous unicap package. Thus
none of libunicap, libucil ands libunicapgtk has a provides
30 matches
Mail list logo
