Re: F43 Change Proposal: 389_Directory_Server_3.2.0 (self-contained)

Ian Pilcher wrote: > On 6/24/25 6:03 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: >> On Аўт, 24 чэр 2025, Tomasz Torcz wrote: >>>  How to check what DB 389 is using, before system-upgrade? >> >> # dsconf EXAMPLE-TEST backend config get | grep nsslapd-backend-implement >> nsslapd-backend-implement: bdb > # dsconf E

Re: Fedora 40 apache now giving errors

Steven A. Falco wrote: > I upgraded to F40, and suddenly an apache cgi script that was working > perfectly in F39 (and earlier) is giving me a "Read-only file system" > error when trying to write data into a file. > > The directory where the cgi is trying to write is owned by > apache:apache, and

Re: firefox glxtest: VA-API test failed: no supported VAAPI profile found.

Reon Beon via devel wrote: > Submitted a bug report for this on the firefox bugzilla: > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1813170 You really should provide more details IMHO. OS version, kernel, package version, video card, driver(s), wayland/x11, etc. I'd probably throw in the output

Re: F37 proposal: Deprecate openssl1.1 package (System-Wide Change)

Kevin P. Fleming wrote: > On 6/22/22 15:05, Vipul Siddharth wrote: >> == Benefit to Fedora == >> This proposal ensures than no new packages in Fedora will rely on the >> deprecated OpenSSL version that will cause an overall increase of >> security/stability, and will reduce the amount of old packag

Re: Unowned system directories

Steve Grubb wrote: > On Wednesday, November 24, 2021 4:51:36 AM EST Miro Hrončok wrote: Should there be a gating or other test that catches this? >>> >>> I've also noticed this problem, but with old python directories >>> lingering after upgrades. >>> For example, on my upgraded-from-ages-ago

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Scale ZRAM to Full Memory Size — arbitrary scaling

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 03:20:38PM +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: >> With today's OpenQA tests I can point out that using zram on 2048MB RAM >> VMs actually breaks FreeIPA deployment: >> https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/763006#step/role_deploy_domain_cont

Re: INVALID USER jden...@redhat.com / FAS jdennis

Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello. > > Does anybody has an alternate contact info for jden...@redhat.com / FAS > jdennis? > > Bugzilla says the account is invalid: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892248 Alex Scheel replaced John as the maintainer. rob ___

Re: Upstream SPEC files - was: Re: patch applied without package maintainers' approve

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 09:01:15AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Mon, 2020-11-16 at 09:22 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >>> >>> (More generally: what would the point of keeping an "upstream" spec >>> file be? >> >> One common reason is to integ

Re: Bugzilla signal/noise ratio

Paul Dufresne via devel wrote: > About outstanding bugs... > > In my opinion, the frequency at which it is sent: every day, is way too often. > For me, once a month would make more sense. > Maybe... maybe once a week. > > For me, the message contains this is a one bug: > https://bugzilla.redhat.c

Re: List of Python 2 packages to be removed mid-November

Miro Hrončok wrote: > rcritten >   certmonger >     (BuildRequires: python2-dbus → PY2) Ported to python 3 and respun. rob ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora

Re: Drop of PlayOnLinux package (Rawhide)

Michael Cronenworth wrote: > On 9/10/19 8:35 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: >> This will lock me in the Steam only:) > > We ship wine-staging, which should handle any Windows game. crossover and wine-* are orthogonal to PoL (and Lutris) which are game/instance managers. crossover has its own managemen

Re: Possibly unresponsive maintainer: vakwetu

Miro Hrončok wrote: On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 3:26 PM Rob Crittenden wrote: He's on PTO for a few weeks. I wonder how valid this remark is when he has not responded in years. I can't speak to his previous work as a maintainer that but I have personal knowledge that he is

Re: qt4 rebuild

Richard Shaw wrote: > Ok, I updated the patch the COMPILER_VERSION issue (committed) and have > a local patch for the Q_FOREACH problem based on a qt 5 commit: > > https://github.com/qt/qtbase/commit/c35a3f519007af44c3b364b9af86f6a336f6411b > > With both of those problems fixed the build still fa

Re: Removal of BuildRoot

nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you for cleaning up the cruft in the repository ! > > Regards, > Agreed. I'm usually pretty anal about others touching packages I maintain without at least a heads-up but in this case it doesn't bother me. I guess particularly since he didn't s

Re: Clean up your spec files

Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > On 8 February 2018 at 15:03, Kamil Dudka > wrote: > [..]  > > There might be valid reasons for the old stuff appearing in _some_ > spec files > beyond your knowledge, for example specfile maintained by upstream, > usable not >

Re: Package Question

Ben Rosser wrote: > On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 12:58 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote: >> Florian Weimer wrote: >>> On 01/08/2018 06:21 PM, Steve Dickson wrote: >>>> Is it a problem for a package to pull from two different >>>> upstream tar balls? Basically have &g

Re: Package Question

Florian Weimer wrote: > On 01/08/2018 06:21 PM, Steve Dickson wrote: >> Is it a problem for a package to pull from two different >> upstream tar balls? Basically have >> >> Source0:http://server.com/package1/package1.tar >> Source1:http://server.com/package2/package2.tar >> >> Then I would, by hand

Re: How do I install freeipa 4.4.4?

edomin...@yahoo.com wrote: > I downloaded the tar file. I read the instructions on the BUILD file. I get > an error (ERROR 1) during the make rpms. Probably something with packages > missing. My server is in a closed network so I cannot use the copr > repository. > > I installed 4.4.0 fro

Re: switching libcurl back to OpenSSL and providing the libcurl-minimal subpackage

Kamil Dudka wrote: > In order to make even smaller Fedora base images, it was proposed to switch > libcurl back to OpenSSL. The Fedora Crypto Consolidation project, which > motivated the switch of libcurl from OpenSSL to NSS ten years ago, is now > deprecated and libcurl is the only package that p

Re: Dealing with the "my packages" problem

David Airlie wrote: > > > - Original Message - >> From: "Brian C. Lane" >> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Sent: Thursday, 19 November, 2015 7:05:57 AM >> Subject: Re: Dealing with the "my packages" problem >> >&g

Re: Dealing with the "my packages" problem

Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 06:08:24PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >> After some IRC discussion I've come to the following proposal: that >> maintainers have some way to easily indicate how open they are to >> external contributions. Basically this would take the form of

Retiring python-tgexpandingformwidget

This project is not being developed or maintained upstream (me) and isn't required by any Fedora packages, and hasn't for quite some time. It builds but who knows if it works. I'm retiring it. rob -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listin

Re: python-yubico updates (testing wanted)

Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-yubico-1.2.3-1.fc20 > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-yubico-1.2.3-1.fc21 > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-yubico-1.2.3-1.fc22 > > I have just created updates for python-yubico. This new upstr

Re: [389-devel] 389-ds-base: /bin/sh scripts should use "." instead of "source"

Roberto Polli wrote: On Friday 24 January 2014 07:28:51 Rich Megginson wrote: https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47511 sorry for the double posting :( I just cloned the master repository and it's not fixed. This is just the tracking ticket for the work. Looks like a candidate patch has bee

Re: Concern about FedoraCryptoConsolidation

Richard Levenberg wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraCryptoConsolidation While I understand the reasons for this idea of Consolidation I have a concern that very valid use cases are being ignored or unknown. As an example I have a use case supported with curl and OpenSSL like this: cur

Re: xv and F19

Joachim Backes wrote: Is it planned to provide F19 with xv? Actually it's not found. It should be available in rpmfusion-nonfree. rob -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: systemd vice SysV/LSB init systems - what next ?

Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le mardi 19 juillet 2011 à 09:48 -0800, Jeff Spaleta a écrit : > >> how is shell more transparent? from my meager understanding of >> systemd we are actually getting better more systematic failure and >> logging information from systemd unit files than we get from the >> c

Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read

Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > [rcritten] ipa: ipa-python-1.2.2-3.fc14.x86_64 False positive -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: move libusb from /usr/lib to /lib

Richard Hughes wrote: > On 23 June 2010 09:50, Tomasz Torcz wrote: >> “/sbin/upsdrvctl is used as the near final step in /etc/init.d/halt to >> command > > That's completely bogus. You really don't want to just power down the > machine like that -- it might lead to disk corruption and is certain