On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:23:34PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 07.12.15 10:48, Tomas Hozza (tho...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > On 04.12.2015 15:57, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > On Tue, 01.12.15 11:15, Tomas Hozza (tho...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > As you've said, this is basically an a
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:30:11PM -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> I'm sure those that need to know, know, but for those that haven't heard[1]
> Mozilla's official Firefox build will enforce addons to contain a Mozilla
> signature without any runtime option to disable the check.
>
> Initially
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 02:28:48AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 27.08.2015 um 02:21 schrieb Solomon Peachy:
> >On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 05:53:36PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
> >>A better solution would be to add a mechanism that allows you to use
> >>your own signing keys.
> >>That way you have bo
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 05:53:36PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Richard Z wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 03:12:25PM +0300, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> >> Their FAQ is constantly updated:
> >>
> >> https://wiki.mozi
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 03:12:25PM +0300, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Their FAQ is constantly updated:
>
> https://wiki.mozilla.org/Addons/Extension_Signing#FAQ
>
> I'm not sure if there is a valid practical reason to refuse submitting the
> addons that we ship to their signing service or if it
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 07:07:34PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 12.02.2015 um 18:53 schrieb Simo Sorce:
> >>Maybe it is only about preventing people from bundling the official
> >>Firefox version with dodgy add-ons. Not downright malware, but things
> >>users may not actually want without r
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 09:47:27AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> In February[2] we sent out an email highlighting that the kernel team
> was not going to treat i686 bugs as a priority. Since that time, we
> have held true to our word and have not focused on fixing i686 bugs at
> all. It seems that
Hi,
seeing plenty of said messages in syslog and no clue where they come
from:
Jun 26 11:27:18 HOST netcf-transaction.sh: Running start: No pending
transaction to rollback
Jun 26 11:27:18 HOST rngd: read error
Jun 26 11:27:18 HOST rngd: read error
Jun 26 11:27:18 HOST rngd: read error
Jun 26 11
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 01:14:03PM +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
> 17.04.2015 07:41, Ralf Corsepius пишет:
> > On 04/17/2015 01:10 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> 14.04.2015 05:20, Ralf Corsepius пишет:
> >>> On 04/14/2015 03:01 AM, Elder Marco wrote:
> >>>
> Ralf, plowshare is a comm
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:01:28PM -0300, Elder Marco wrote:
>
> Jason, thanks! I could package the modules. But this is not a good ideia as
> explained above. The package will be quickly outdated. Perharps, before I
> mark it as stable. However, if necessary, I will submit a review request to
> a
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 08:57:56AM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> There the problem is, that dracut runs a fsck check before deciding
> whether to resume. This can result in a big file system corruption,
> since the kernel had a different idea of the file system state after
> resuming from hibernation
Hi,
yesterday and today this mirror caused yum to hang for
indefinite periods of time (waited over two minutes),
only c-c helps.
Richard
---
Name and OpenPGP keys available from pgp key servers
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:22:08AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 17:47:47 +0100
> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > > There will be such times, sure.
> > Here (Germany), in recent times, they happen almost daily. My guess
> > is the "fedora flavors", the launch of f22 and the mass-rebui
Hi,
when doing yum update in the last few weeks I am seeing thousands of errors
like
(1/2): _local/primary_db| 3.4 MB 00:00
updates/21/i386/primary_db FAILED
http://mirror.netcologne.de/fedora/linux/updates/
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 07:28:50PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:21:59PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >> >> I've never argumented against the goal that web browser or all network
> >> >> aware
> >> >> services sho
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 01:28:56PM +0100, Richard Z wrote:
> - tune2fs -C 1 dev is apparently ignored on all devices
as pointed out on bugzilla that was my mistake, I have confused the
options in the hurry.
Richard
---
Name and OpenPGP keys available from pgp key serv
Hi,
have very recently upgraded from F19 to F21 and notice scary log entires
after hibernation/resume.
Watch your logs!
The hardware (in combination with F19) was rock solid all the time and
is fairly boring. I am still running 32 bit x86. No sign of any problems
when not hibernating. I have c
17 matches
Mail list logo
