On Monday, 17 March 2025 at 17:21, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> It looks like libfido2 was rebuilt before libcbor 0.12 was in the buildroot.
> So it will need to be rebuilt again, this time with libcbor 0.12
> present, preferably :)
Ack, indeed :) Yell when you want me to do the fwupd build.
Richard
On Monday, 17 March 2025 at 16:45, Gary Buhrmaster
wrote:
> git commit —allow-empty -m 'Rebuild for foolib 3.14'
Yes, I guess that works -- thanks. On doing so, I got:
DEBUG util.py:459: Problem: package git-core-2.48.1-3.fc43.x86_64 from build
requires openssh-clients, but none of the provid
On Monday, 17 March 2025 at 02:51, Gary Buhrmaster
wrote:
> I have rebuilt libfido2. For fwupd, I will need the
> assistance of the fwupd maintainers (CC'ed),
> Please use the side tag f43-build-side-108004
> (fedpkg build --target=f43-build-side-108004)
Hi Gary,
I tried this, but got "GenericE
On Monday, 24 February 2025 at 09:30, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > Has anyone else seen this? Frustratingly I can't reproduce locally.
> Last time we saw and fixed this issue was 4 years ago.
Hmm, it's certainly something in the latest release.
> A reproducer is welcome because the mistake probably hap
Hi all,
My CI has been failing for the last 24h with:
[ 4/48] Installing fwupd-0:2.0.7-0.1alpha.fc41.x86_64 100% | 39.9 MiB
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::length_error'
what(): basic_string::_M_replace_aux
contrib/ci/fedora-test.sh: line 3: 7 Aborted
On Thursday, 19 December 2024 at 09:51, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> PP should lead by example IMHO. And and this is not any different!
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-tiktoken/c/66a5632ba66ed27b6d1d633592724d6be612d638
I guess I'm also as bad as Peter then:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpm
On Monday, 16 December 2024 at 22:03, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> > We neglected to make available the facts behind our decision quickly
> Why should there be a right to anonymity in this process?
I'm really not sure what FESCo is thinking; what a way to destroy trust from a
community. Fedora Engi
On Monday, 16 December 2024 at 16:25, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> This process does make me worry that I might get suddenly de-pp'ed at
> some point too.
I'm in the same boat; I know I've been guilty of pushing minor build fixes
without asking. I've also touched hundreds of packages over the years
Hi all,
I've just built fwupd 2.0.0 into rawhide, which bumps the libfwupd soname from
libfwupd.so.2 to libfwupd.so.3. I've rebuilt gnome-firmware, gnome-software and
plasma-discover in the f42-build-side-97511 side tag with no issue, and have
created a bodhi update with all 4 builds here:
htt
