Hi,
The mail "[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests" is showing me
these items since some time ago.
These seems to have the NEEDINFO flag, but they are CLOSED (and
several releases ago).
Should the closure of the bugreport have cancelled or provided the NEEDINFO?
I really want to get ri
Hi,
today i noticed that sqlite and sqlite-devel have both broken
dependencies as reported by dnf.
Reported at:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312014
Cheers.
[...TRUNCATED...]
qca x86_64
2.1.1-4.fc23
Hi,
I tested F20 on a physical host with a vertex3 ssd.
But it was not a requested test case, i re-used a md raid0 with a 6gb
partition of the ssd.
The file-system was setup as a storage pool for virt-manager.
I did not experience any issues, i installed 2 F20 guest at the same time.
I even rebo
Hi,
I am not sure what to exactly report to bugzilla, this is my issue:
I did install F20b TC4 and selected Spanish/Argentina at the Welcome
Screen, then later i switched the keyboard to Spanish. The install (i
selected Minimal) had no issues.
After booting, i noticed that some characters are no
Hi,
I recently installed F20b TC2 on a physical host and performed a yum update.
There was one failed package and a couple of errors at the 'cleaning' phase.
Output of 'yum update' (truncated)
[...TRUNCATED...]
Cleanup: 1:java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.2.1.fc20.x86_64
On https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2013-10-13_SSD_Cache
>> Note the set uuid and attach /dev/sdb1 to /dev/sda2: echo >
>> /sys/block/bcache0/bcache/attach
Maybe that can be enhanced to say "cset.uuid" instead of just "uuid" /
"set uuid"? (for which i confused it with dev.uuid shown by b
> I guess what I find confusing is when anaconda uses one naming convention in
> its UI, but upon reboot the installed system uses a different naming
> convention.
> And neither convention helps me know which of two ethernets are > being used.
When i installed F19, anaconda wrote the config file
Hi,
Here goes a dumb question:
Where is the listing of all (active) fedora policies located?
I am looking specifically for the greeter (gdm/kmd/etc) policy.
Thanks in advance.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
will
happen again, i really don't know).
Cheers.
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 5:48 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 16.05.13 21:22, Reartes Guillermo (rtgui...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> Sorry for the late response.
>
>> # systemctl --full list-jobs
>> JOB UNIT
Hi,
ON: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2013-05-28_Virtualization
> Fedora 19 on a physical machine
> The preferred testing platform is a fully updated Fedora 19 machine. You have
> a few options for getting the Fedora 18 bits:
(there is a typo , since it says Fedora 18 bits, should it
8388604 20 0
/dev/sdc3 partition 8388604 0 -1
Could it be releated to that the two swap partitions where both
priority '0' or something else?
Cheers.
rtguille.
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Thu,
Hi, i just tried to compare my F17 system with F19 pre-release and found
something odd in my F17 system:
# uptime
19:08:26 up 2 days, 10 min, 5 users, load average: 0.18, 0.28, 0.31
# systemd-analyze time
Bootup is not yet finished. Please try again later.
A very funny message. :-)
What does c
Adam,
> the groupinstall virtualization, and creating a VM with a NIC set to
> bridged mode.
Maybe this refers to creating a macvtap bridge NIC.
Cheers.
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 14:57 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> On May 16, 2013, at 2:17
d scheme is more convenient.
Cheers.
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Przemek Klosowski <
przemek.klosow...@nist.gov> wrote:
> On 05/03/2013 04:08 PM, Reartes Guillermo wrote:
>
>> I think that the previous behaviour was better. (covering the password
>> with bullets).
I think that the previous behaviour was better. (covering the password with
bullets).
At least the phones only show one character at a time, not the whole
password.
Cheers.
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the latest Fedora 19 Beta TC2 install after I got through
Hi,
I noticed this after many freezes (due to bug 954181) in the messages:
[3.549075] systemd-journald[177]: File
/var/log/journal/4697cb8e07b94ed28925792b701e629f/system.journal corrupted
or uncleanly shut down, renaming and replacing.
But why is it running if i did not enable it nor have i
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/22555
(Quota reached: can't delete)
When you reach a quota limit, the first intuitive action one takes is
to delete something to make space.
But aparently (and currently) with btrfs one needs to change the quota
and then delete.
I have not yet
To make BTRFS (or any new file-system) the default for a distribution
will be really hard.
My thought on the subject:
-1. IS IT STILL DESIRED TO MAKE BTRFS THE DEFAULT FILE-SYSTEM FOR
FEDORA AT SOME (yet unknown) POINT IN THE FUTURE?
0. DETERMINE A ROOT FILE-SYSTEM CRITERIA (AND/OR a DEFAULT FS
I am testing btrfs on kvm guest, currently i have found:
* Bug 894837 - Transient / Intermittent ENOSPC errors with BTRFS and F18
(btrfs gives no space left on device at full or near full filesystem
and heavy io, for example deleting stuff to reclaim space.)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fed
19 matches
Mail list logo
