Re: Revocation of provenpackager access from pbrobinson

2024-12-18 Thread Randy Barlow via devel
On Thu, 2024-12-19 at 00:31 +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > I don't understand what was the goal exactly of making this a public > announcement rather than just notifying the decision to the affected > person. And I also don't understand what was the hurry to do it > before > having a publ

Re: Revocation of provenpackager access from pbrobinson

2024-12-17 Thread Randy Barlow via devel
On Fri, 2024-12-13 at 17:33 -0800, Josh Stone wrote: > The Fedora Proven Packager Policy[1] reads: “Provenpackagers lend a > hand > when help is needed, always with a desire to improve the quality of > Fedora. Prior to making changes, provenpackagers should try to > communicate with owners of a pac

Re: Rustc version

2024-07-24 Thread Randy Barlow via devel
On Wed, 2024-07-24 at 22:13 +0200, Albert Larsan wrote: > Know that this is one of the cases that is explicitly not covered > under > the stability guarantee, i.e that code without warnings may get > warnings > on the next version Agreed. > This, the crate should fix the bug, and a one-line pat

Re: Rustc version

2024-07-24 Thread Randy Barlow via devel
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 06:03:10PM -, Emanuel Lima wrote: > It's kata-containers. It works from 1.75 to 1.78 but not with 1.79. > > I opened an issue upstream: > https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/issues/10067 One more note: You could also work around this by patching that one

Re: Rustc version

2024-07-24 Thread Randy Barlow via devel
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 06:03:10PM -, Emanuel Lima wrote: > It's kata-containers. It works from 1.75 to 1.78 but not with 1.79. > > I opened an issue upstream: > https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/issues/10067 For what it's worth, this isn't really a true issue. It looks like

Re: Rustc version

2024-07-24 Thread Randy Barlow via devel
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 11:29:43AM -0300, Emanuel Lima wrote: > To build the package that I maintain, I need a specific version of rustc, > 1.75. Given that the default buildroot has rustc 1.79, how do I create a > new buildroot (or side tag) just for my package with this specific rustc? Rust shou

Re: Updating Taskwarrior to v3

2024-04-15 Thread Randy Barlow via devel
As a tangent on this thread, it would be cool if there were a mechanism in dnf to tell users when an upgrade needs special attention/instructions. Another example like this is postgresql updates, which also require manual intervention. -- ___ devel ma

Re: F40 Change: Privacy-preserving Telemetry for Fedora Workstation (System-Wide)

2023-07-07 Thread Randy Barlow via devel
On 7/7/23 19:59, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: That is not consent. The GDPR explicitly states that consent must be opt-IN. I agree. I think it is important to make it possible for a user to ask for the data collected from their machine to be deleted in the event they mistakenly submitted data,

Re: It’s time to transform the Fedora devel list into something new

2023-04-26 Thread Randy Barlow via devel
On 4/26/23 08:42, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: As I see it, the main roadblocks for new packagers are: * accepting the FPCA, * getting sponsored, * learning the Packaging Guidelines, and * getting their package(s) through review, and that last point can be a roadblock even for existing packagers

Re: It’s time to transform the Fedora devel list into something new

2023-04-26 Thread Randy Barlow via devel
On 4/26/23 11:25, Matthew Miller wrote: Use j/k to scroll up and down (ah, vi, your legacy will live forever) According to Wikipedia, it's actually the ADM-3A: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ADM-3A#Legacy I recently learned this, and find it fascinating ☺ __

Re: It’s time to transform the Fedora devel list into something new

2023-04-23 Thread Randy Barlow via devel
On 4/21/23 14:05, Matthew Miller wrote: Accessiblity is important to Fedora, and I take this seriously. For Discourse, hit the ? key to bring up the page describing keyboard shortcuts. One thing I don't care for when it comes to web apps and keyboard shortcuts is that they are non-standard. Wh

Re: nspawn for rawhide?

2022-08-18 Thread Randy Barlow via devel
On Thu, 2022-08-18 at 14:01 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Thoughts? ♥ nspawn ♥ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fe

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-04-07 Thread Randy Barlow via devel
On Thu, 2022-04-07 at 17:02 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > > I like Zbigniew's plan too! But I gotta ask, what is "FWMOIW"? > > For What My Opinion Is Worth :-) I also hadn't seen this acronym, but I was hoping it was going to be some kind of cipher since Simo works on the crypto team ☺ signature.a

Re: Fedora Source-git SIG report #1 (June 2021)

2021-07-02 Thread Randy Barlow via devel
On Wed, 2021-06-30 at 14:31 +0200, Tomas Tomecek wrote: > After reading your explanation of how gentoo does packaging, it > indeed makes a lot of sense and feels like that most of the > concerns I pointed out have solutions or could be mitigated. > > The biggest problem I personally see is the eff

Re: Fedora Source-git SIG report #1 (June 2021)

2021-06-29 Thread Randy Barlow via devel
On Wed, 2021-06-30 at 01:01 +, Randy Barlow via devel wrote: > An example of this is gstreamer - in Gentoo I just have > gstreamer installed, and the various plugin packs like good bad and > ugly are just USE variables on that one package. Ooops, I was wrong on this example. They d

Re: Fedora Source-git SIG report #1 (June 2021)

2021-06-29 Thread Randy Barlow via devel
On Tue, 2021-06-29 at 15:36 +0200, Tomas Tomecek wrote: > > On the "uni-repo" counter proposal: there's a bunch of real-world > > examples here of distributions using this successfully: > > https://github.com/projectatomic/rpmdistro-gitoverlay/blob/master/doc/reworking-fedora-releng.md#unified-sour