Re: hostname exposed over ssh?

2025-09-10 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, 3 Sept 2025 at 19:03, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > On 9/3/25 9:25 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > > Typically Fedora hosts have shown remote names in terminal windows > > when sshed in but I've notice in a number of cases this no longer > > happens on remote F

hostname exposed over ssh?

2025-09-03 Thread Peter Robinson
Hey Folks, Typically Fedora hosts have shown remote names in terminal windows when sshed in but I've notice in a number of cases this no longer happens on remote F-43 hosts. Is this an expected change? I'm not even siure whether this is openssh or if it's provided by another component to know whe

Re: CMake 4.0 and other change proposals

2025-07-28 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 at 17:28, Cristian Le via devel wrote: > > On 2025/07/26 17:41, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > > Do we have a date for when these changes are going to land in Fedora? > > I did not set a deadline, mostly because the work is done in PRs and > copr repos. There is a hard deadline bas

soname bump for libwebsockets

2025-07-21 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi Folks, There's a minor soname bump for libwebsockets in rawhide. In Fedora packages have been rebuilt, except for kismet which was already FTBFS [1] Peter [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2340697 -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@l

Re: Post datacenter move steps?

2025-07-08 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, 8 Jul 2025 at 08:22, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: > > Hi all, > > thank you for all the work you did/are doing atm with datacenter move! > I'm looking forward to faster infrastructure for my builds and tests :) . > > Unfortunately (as with every big change) discrepancies are appearing and > althou

Re: Interesting Phoronix comment about Xlibre (X11Libre) on Asahi

2025-06-26 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 at 19:20, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Leigh Scott wrote: > > Are you going to submit x11libre for package review without the obsoletes > > and provides? > > Currently, I am rather thinking of just putting up a Copr, with > Obsoletes/Provides for seamless migration, but on

Re: F43 Change Proposal: Drop i686 support (system wide)

2025-06-25 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 at 18:21, Dan Horák wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 17:51:15 +0100 > Peter Robinson wrote: > > > On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 at 15:36, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 at 10:21, Michael Catanzar

Re: F43 Change Proposal: Drop i686 support (system wide)

2025-06-25 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 at 15:36, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > > > On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 at 10:21, Michael Catanzaro wrote: >> >> >> With Wine solved, it sounds like Steam is the only remaining concern. >> >> I think we could actually remove all 32-bit libraries *not* required by >> Steam for Fedora *43*

Re: F43 Change Proposal: Substitute Sans For Mono (self-contained)

2025-06-08 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 at 14:49, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce wrote: > > Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SubstituteSansForMono > Discussion thread - > https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f43-change-proposal-substitute-sans-for-mono-self-contained/155255 > > This is a proposed Chan

Re: Remove openh264?

2025-05-29 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, 29 May 2025 at 10:54, Jonathan Schleifer wrote: > > Thanks for bringing this to my attention - I had no idea Fedora would > let something so serious be unfixed for so long, as I kinda assumed > Fedora is on top of security updates. Time to immediately delete > openh264 indeed! However: Th

Re: Fedora Council statement on Proven Packager situation

2025-05-22 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, 22 May 2025 at 19:20, Roy Bekken wrote: > > FESCO stated they was assembling the facts back in december but wanted to > discuss it with the revoked person first. I had a conversation with a member of FESCo and the FPL about the situation some time ago. > I’ve have not seen anymore on th

Re: Inactive packagers removed from the packager group

2025-05-08 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, 7 May 2025 at 18:56, Davide Cavalca wrote: > > On 2025-05-07 00:50, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Wed, 7 May 2025 at 02:00, Davide Cavalca > > wrote: > >> > >> On 2025-05-06 17:03, Kevin Fenzi via devel-announce wrote: > &g

Re: Inactive packagers removed from the packager group

2025-05-08 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, 7 May 2025 at 19:11, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 3:45 AM Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > On Wed, 7 May 2025 at 02:23, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 8:06 PM Kevin F

Re: Inactive packagers removed from the packager group

2025-05-07 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, 7 May 2025 at 02:00, Davide Cavalca wrote: > > On 2025-05-06 17:03, Kevin Fenzi via devel-announce wrote: > > Packages that have been orphaned are: > [...] > > > > rpms/libbsd > > rpms/python-pytest-cov > > rpms/python-stevedore > > rpms/tpm2-abrmd > > rpms/tpm2-tools > > rpms/tpm2-tss > >

Re: Inactive packagers removed from the packager group

2025-05-07 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, 7 May 2025 at 02:23, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 8:06 PM Kevin Fenzi via devel-announce > wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > Packages that have been orphaned are: > > > > [...] > > > rpms/bluez > > rpms/dm-zoned-tools > > rpms/dnf-plugin-cow > > rpms/open-vm-tools > > rpms/os

Re: Fedora on Raspberry Pi

2025-04-19 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi Milan, just out of interest, I tried Fedora 42 Beta image on Raspberry Pi 4 > with 2GB RAM and it was, well, more than sluggish. Their OS based on > the Debian Bookworm was lightning fast, using the same SD card and all > the hardware for both images. > You don't say which image you use, an im

Re: F42 upgrade and email problems

2025-04-18 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 at 14:30, Steven A. Falco wrote: > After updating to f42 I noticed that I could not send email from the > command line: > > $ mail root@localhost > Subject: test > To: root@localhost > test > ^D > s-nail: Cannot start /usr/sbin/sendmail: executable not found (adjust > *mta* va

Re: Update to F42, keyboard no longer works?

2025-04-16 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 at 23:31, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2025-04-15 at 18:15 -0400, Steven A. Falco wrote: > > On 4/15/25 05:37 PM, Joe Doss wrote: > > > On 4/15/25 4:22 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote: > > > > I just completed an upgrade to f42, and I could not log in to my > main machine becaus

Re: cleaning up our nomenclature

2025-04-14 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 at 12:54, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Hi folks, > > A few years ago we had the initalitive to get rid of problematic terms > like "master"/"slave". Git changed its default branch name to 'main', > we changed our default dist-git name to 'rawhide' (*). We also > adjust

Re: Soname bump: libcamera

2025-04-07 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, 7 Apr 2025 at 13:21, Milan Zamazal wrote: > Hi, > > I plan to update libcamera to 0.5.0 in rawhide, which means ABI change. > The only package affected is pipewire-plugin-libcamera, which must be > rebuilt against the updated libcamera version. > libcamera-apps is also affected. > In t

Re: Using AI/Machine Learning to upscale make graphics better for open source graphics?

2025-04-06 Thread Peter Robinson
I'm guessing he means for upscaling video and games similar to what's described in this blog: https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/what-is-ai-upscaling/ On Sun, 6 Apr 2025 at 20:53, Ben Beasley wrote: > I don’t think there is enough information to understand what this > proposal actually means, even i

Re: F42 and Rawhide: mbedtls update from 2.28.8 to 3.6.2

2025-03-25 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 at 16:09, Dan Horák wrote: > On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 15:45:54 - > "William Roberts" wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > We are updating mbedtls package from version 2.28.8 to 3.6.2 since 2.28 > has reached end of life. > > The summary of SONAME changes for the package is below. > > a

Orphaning python-aenum

2025-03-17 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi Folks, I've orphaned python-aenum as I no longer have a need for it. It looks like it's needed by a few packages: python3-dbf-0:0.99.3-5.fc41.noarch python3-pyone-0:6.0.2-11.fc41.noarch python3-pypcapkit-0:0.15.5-12.fc41.noarch So it's there for someone who needs it to pick it up. Peter --

Re: Multiple kernels

2025-02-24 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 at 11:40, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 6:04 AM Simon Farnsworth via devel > wrote: > > > > On Sunday, 23 February 2025 18:14:21 Greenwich Mean Time Benson Muite > wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 23, 2025, at 9:55 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > > > > > > On 2/22/25 6:50 PM

Python distro deps for builds using venv

2025-02-11 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi python folks, I have a package [1] (you can toggle the with_python var at the top) that now builds the python bindings in an isolated venv+pip environment, and hence fails, [2]. It seems, at least in the way upstream currently configures it, you can't seem to use the distro provided python dep

Re: Intent to orphan evolution-mapi and openchange packages for f43

2025-02-10 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 at 09:41, Milan Crha wrote: > Hello, > I'd like to orphan the evolution-mapi and openchange packages for the > Fedora 43. Both are for the Microsoft's MAPI protocol. The OpenChange > lost its upstream many years ago. > > The Microsoft released the first version of an E

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Switch to EROFS for Live Media (self-contained)

2025-01-25 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 at 10:20, Simon de Vlieger wrote: > Hi Neal (and Dusty), > > On 1/15/25 11:53 PM, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce wrote: > > EROFS is considerably more actively developed than SquashFS, and > > offers more modern file system features that can be utilized in the > > future. >

Re: [rfc] mass package change to introduce sysusers.d configs

2025-01-25 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 at 14:08, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 08:55:12AM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 at 20:52, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < > zbys...@in.waw.pl> > > wrote: > > Is there a list of those pac

Re: [rfc] mass package change to introduce sysusers.d configs

2025-01-24 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 at 20:52, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Hi! > > In accordance with > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Mass_package_changes/, > I plan to do a "mass package change" to add sysusers.d config files for > all packages > which currently call 'useradd' and 'groupadd

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Deprecate Zezere Provisioning Server (IoT) (self-contained)

2025-01-16 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 at 11:05, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 10:49:41AM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 at 10:44, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < > zbys...@in.waw.pl> > > wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2025

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Deprecate Zezere Provisioning Server (IoT) (self-contained)

2025-01-16 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 at 10:44, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 10:41:15PM +, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce > wrote: > > Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Deprecate_Zezere > > Discussion thread - > > > > This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux. > >

Re: Retiring GlusterFS in Fedora 42. First Notice

2025-01-09 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 at 12:07, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Sun, Jan 05, 2025 at 02:07:11PM +0300, Benson Muite wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 4, 2025, at 9:28 PM, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > > Are you a packager? > > > > Yes > > > > What's your FAS ID? > > > > Fed500 > > Note that the entire virt

Re: Retiring GlusterFS in Fedora 42. First Notice

2025-01-04 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sat, 4 Jan 2025, 11:26 Michael J Gruber, wrote: > Am Sa., 4. Jan. 2025 um 03:30 Uhr schrieb Samuel Sieb : > > > > On 1/3/25 6:08 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 3, 2025 at 5:20 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > > >> > > >> On 1/3/25 4:39 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > >>> > > >>> On Tue, Jun 25,

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Intel Compute Runtime - Upgrade with HW cut-off (self-contained)

2024-12-30 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sun, 29 Dec 2024 at 23:13, Kevin Kofler via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 16/12/2024 21:43, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce wrote: > >> removed support for GPU Generations prior to the > >> 12th Gen GPUs. This effectively means that any

Re: Revocation of provenpackager access from pbrobinson

2024-12-18 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 at 22:35, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Oh, one additional item I wanted to mention... > > I wonder if we could encourage maintainers/community members to do > something like this: > https://cassidoo.co/post/remote-intros/ > > TLDR: a small page listing your contact prefs, timezones, e

Re: Revocation of provenpackager access from pbrobinson

2024-12-17 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 at 13:28, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 16. 12. 24 v 23:13 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a): > > Dne 16. 12. 24 v 7:03 odp. Miro Hrončok napsal(a): > >> > >> And based on my experience, I doubt this particular provenpackager > >> status was stripped based on something like that. > >> > >

Re: On revoking provenpackager from probinson

2024-12-17 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi FESCo, On behalf of FESCo, please accept our apology for how we communicated the > news regarding the revocation of provenpackager privileges for Peter > Robinson. This one was really difficult for us to figure out how best to > communicate and we have made mistakes. > > We ne

Re: Revocation of provenpackager access from pbrobinson

2024-12-16 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, 16 Dec 2024 at 19:42, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 8:11 PM Gary Buhrmaster > wrote: > > > > On Sat, Dec 14, 2024 at 10:18 PM Fabio Valentini > wrote: > > > > > In "the spirit of transparency": > > > FESCo agreed that a public ticket with a summary of the discussion i

Re: Revocation of provenpackager access from pbrobinson

2024-12-15 Thread Peter Robinson
rtrayal of me as some pantomime villain is unfair. On Tuesday (2024-12-10), the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee > (FESCo) met in a private meeting to discuss whether Fedora contributor > Peter Robinson should retain his provenpackager privileges. Over the > last year, multiple privat

Re: Inadvertent Thanksgiving gating amnesty - sorry

2024-11-30 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 at 16:33, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Thu, 2024-11-28 at 09:26 +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 at 09:23, Adam Williamson > > wrote: > > > > > > Hey folks! just wanted to alert you to an, ahem, situation today... >

Re: Inadvertent Thanksgiving gating amnesty - sorry

2024-11-28 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 at 09:23, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Hey folks! just wanted to alert you to an, ahem, situation today... > > I foolishly fiddled with the production greenwave config (I forgot > staging greenwave was a thing...) and got burned. For a few minutes I > pushed a bad config that dis

Re: RamaLama is now packaged up for Fedora.

2024-11-19 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 at 18:52, Daniel Walsh wrote: > > RamaLama is now available as a package for Fedora 40,41 and Rawhide. > python-ramalama. > > dnf install ramalama > > You can also install it via pip/pipx from PyPi. > > Try it out for your AI Inferencing needs. > > github.com/containers/ramala

Re: Moving away from the term "karma" in Bodhi

2024-11-13 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, 13 Nov 2024 at 15:47, Ken Gaillot wrote: > > On Wed, 2024-11-13 at 14:41 +, Barry wrote: > > > On 11 Nov 2024, at 08:16, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < > > > zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > > > > > > That's a great idea. If we are to change, please do 'kudos' rather > > > 'rating'/'feedback

Re: RFC: Moving to -O3 for Fedora Linux

2024-10-31 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 at 11:11, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 10:57:02AM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 at 07:32, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 10:46:01PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > >

Re: RFC: Moving to -O3 for Fedora Linux

2024-10-31 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 at 07:32, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 10:46:01PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > I know the idea of moving to -O3 has been briefly mentioned before in > > other contexts when we've discussed uplifting the flags, but it looks > > like Ubuntu is moving to -O3 fo

Re: X11 support removed from GDM 1:47.0-1

2024-10-20 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 at 06:52, Joe Doss wrote: > > I just updated tonight to the latest updates-testing packages on my > Fedora 41 Beta Workstation install and I could no longer log into my X11 > session after logging out. > > Checking https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2548720 >

Re: Removal of vesa and fbdev X.org drivers from Rawhide and Fedora 41

2024-10-17 Thread Peter Robinson
> > I've now tested and basic graphics mode works OK on UEFI and BIOS on > > both GNOME and KDE with a recent F41 image, so that's good. It uses > > Wayland in all cases so no X drivers involved. The other case I'm > > concerned about is doing a basic graphics install of Fedora 39, and > > upgradin

Re: Removal of vesa and fbdev X.org drivers from Rawhide and Fedora 41

2024-10-17 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 at 16:48, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Mon, 2024-10-07 at 10:42 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > I noticed that the vesa and fbdev X.org drivers were recently retired > > from Rawhide. There appears to be no Change for this. The commit > > messages for the retirements refer t

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2024-10-08 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi Fabio, > > rust-sval @rust-sig, orphan0 weeks > > ago > > rust-sval_buffer @rust-sig, orphan0 weeks > > ago > > rust-sval_derive @rust-sig, orphan0 weeks > > ago > > rust-sval_derive_mac

Re: Removal of vesa and fbdev X.org drivers from Rawhide

2024-10-07 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi Adam, > I noticed that the vesa and fbdev X.org drivers were recently retired > from Rawhide. There appears to be no Change for this. The commit > messages for the retirements refer to this old Change: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceFbdevDrivers#Detailed_Description > > but t

Re: Updating xorg-x11-server

2024-09-29 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sun, 29 Sept 2024 at 17:21, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 02:33:21PM GMT, Simone Caronni wrote: > > > xorg-x11-server is ready, I just fixed last issue which was with > > > Nouveau drive > > > > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-nouveau/-/merge_requests/

Re: [SPDX] packages that are "not valid neither as Callaway nor as SPDX"

2024-09-09 Thread Peter Robinson
> > > >> Bellow is list of packages that have licenses that are neither valid as > > > >> Callaway nor as SPDX. I.e. the license cannot be validated neither > > > >> using > > > >> 'license-validate' nor using 'license-validate --old'. > > > >> > > > >> swt2c perl-Data-Validate-IP > > > > > >

Re: [SPDX] packages that are "not valid neither as Callaway nor as SPDX"

2024-09-06 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, 6 Sept 2024 at 09:49, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Bellow is list of packages that have licenses that are neither valid as > Callaway nor as SPDX. I.e. the license cannot be validated neither using > 'license-validate' nor using 'license-validate --old'. > > Some examples I checked (random

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F40 to F41

2024-09-03 Thread Peter Robinson
> > > * you may want to run the same command with dnf5 to help test new dnf. Do > > > not forget to add --best otherwise DNF5 hides all problems. > > > > One thing I've noticed with dnf5 is that somethings are missing, I'm > > not sure if they've been replaced with something else. EG "dnf > > conf

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F40 to F41

2024-09-03 Thread Peter Robinson
> One note: > > * you may want to run the same command with dnf5 to help test new dnf. Do not > forget to add --best otherwise DNF5 hides all problems. One thing I've noticed with dnf5 is that somethings are missing, I'm not sure if they've been replaced with something else. EG "dnf config-manage

Re: Questions regarding CPUs on aarch64 builders

2024-09-03 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi Artur, > I maintain the cpufetch package [0], which is a program that allows the > user to retrieve some info about the CPU of the machine - such as cache > size, frequency, sometimes also the manufacturer and model. > > A few weeks ago, the program had a new release and I updated the package.

Re: Plan to orphan xapian-core/xapian-bindings

2024-08-21 Thread Peter Robinson
t's your FAS? > Thanks > > Christiano > > On 18/08/2024 12.06, Peter Robinson wrote: > > Hey Folks, > > > > I just realised I still maintain xapian-core/xapian-bindings, I > > haven't used them for years so it's probably better someone who > > a

Plan to orphan xapian-core/xapian-bindings

2024-08-18 Thread Peter Robinson
Hey Folks, I just realised I still maintain xapian-core/xapian-bindings, I haven't used them for years so it's probably better someone who actively makes use of them take them over. If anyone would like to take over before I orphan them ping me and I'll move the ownership over. They're a pretty l

Re: F41 branching completed

2024-08-13 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 at 22:12, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 10:07:07PM GMT, Peter Robinson wrote: > > Hi Kevin, > > > > > Fedora Linux 41 has now been branched, please be sure to do a > > > 'git fetch -v' to pick up the new branch. A

Re: F41 branching completed

2024-08-13 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi Kevin, > Fedora Linux 41 has now been branched, please be sure to do a > 'git fetch -v' to pick up the new branch. As an additional reminder, > rawhide/41 has been completely isolated from previous releases, which > means that anything you do for 41 you also have to do in the rawhide > branch a

Re: aarch64 iso images - can we link the Everything installer?

2024-07-16 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 at 08:28, Adam Samalik wrote: > > I noticed we're no longer link to aarch64 isos: > https://fedoraproject.org/spins/kde/download > Not even for Workstation: https://fedoraproject.org/workstation/download > > I heard it failed to build. Fair enough. We do link the Server insta

Re: Guidance on individual packages requiring x86_64-v2 baseline ?

2024-06-24 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 at 11:21, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 21. 06. 24 v 18:27 Stephen Smoogen napsal(a): > > On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 at 07:27, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> So what is the reason to not treat x86_64_v2 as different arch then > >> x86_64_v{1,3}. Why we keep having this discussion instead of

Re: Serial console getty chance since F-40 GA?

2024-06-20 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 at 22:03, Jason Montleon wrote: > > It may be this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2290482 Yep, that's it, an enforcing=0 in the kernel command line works. > On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 5:00 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > Hi folks, &

Serial console getty chance since F-40 GA?

2024-06-20 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi folks, I'm seeing an issue when using serial consoles, which I use quite a bit when doing low level HW pieces on Edge. The serial console getty isn't coming up automatically when I update from GA to the latest Fedora updates. If I run "systemctl enable serial-getty@ttyS0.service --now" it com

Re: Guidance on individual packages requiring x86_64-v2 baseline ?

2024-06-19 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 at 19:13, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > On Wednesday, 19 June 2024 at 17:17, drago01 wrote: > > [...] at some point we need to do the cut and not being held back by old > > / ancient hardware forever. > > What do you mean by "being held back"? What's being prevented

Re: Guidance on individual packages requiring x86_64-v2 baseline ?

2024-06-19 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 at 13:58, Chris Adams wrote: > > Once upon a time, Ben Cotton said: > > For myself, I think it's reasonable to conclude there's a non-trivial > > amount of people using QEMU on that hardware in some fashion. Much of > > that is probably from podman as opposed to running large

Re: Intention to unretire and rename pyftpdlib

2024-05-22 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, 21 May 2024 at 23:51, Sandro wrote: > > Hi, > > I intend to unretire pyftpdlib [1] and rename the base package to > python-pyftpdlib in line with current Python Packaging Guidelines. The Why unretire? Why not just do a new package given the new name? > package has been retired for more t

Re: Intent to start ARC investigation git-forge replacement

2024-05-20 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, 16 May 2024 at 13:29, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Tue, 2024-04-23 at 12:06 +0200, Tomas Hrcka wrote: > > 1. Suitability for dist-git and src.fedoraproject.org replacement > > Can someone explain me what is the problem of pagure ? There's been a lot of discussions about it. I believe some

Re: Is there a policy for branches being merged or not

2024-04-28 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sun, 28 Apr 2024, 09:28 Julian Sikorski, wrote: > Hello, > > is there a general recommendation regarding keeping git release branches > separate vs merged? I have been keeping mine separate. Originally to > avoid release and changelog conflicts when cherry-picking, but I got > used to it and k

Re: F41 Change Proposal: Fedora Miracle Spin (self-contained)

2024-04-25 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 at 12:32, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 10:49 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 10:33:51PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 3:26 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr

Re: Rust Stack Spring Cleaning - 2024 Edition

2024-04-22 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 at 14:26, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hello Rust packagers, > > I'm continuously working on reducing unnecessary accumulation of cruft > in the Rust package stack in Fedora, and I have been keeping track of > unused library packages for almost three years now. > > Some of these

Re: network service removed in Fedora 40 without a Change proposal(?)

2024-04-15 Thread Peter Robinson
> > > Just for record, the removal of network-scripts was done because > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/dhclient_deprecation > > > > That page has Category:ChangePageIncomplete. > > dhcp-client is present in F40, even though it has Provides:deprecated(). > > > > > Network-scripts heavil

Re: xz backdoor

2024-03-30 Thread Peter Robinson
> >>> I don't know how the assumption came up that F40 is only affected if > >>> users opted in for testing, but that interpretation already ended up > >>> in the Fedora Magazine and in the official linkedin post of Fedora (I > >>> already asked to correct it). > >> > >> I believe that statement is

Re: F41 Change Proposal: Disable openSSL Engine Support (system-wide)

2024-03-20 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 at 09:05, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote: > > Hi! > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 9:50 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: >> >> On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 08:37:19PM +, Aoife Moloney wrote: >> > Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OpensslNoEngine >> > >> > This is a prop

Re: GStreamer 1.24 Released With Vulkan H.264/H.265 Decode & Many Enhancements

2024-03-05 Thread Peter Robinson
> https://www.phoronix.com/news/GStreamer-1.24-Released The Fedora gstreamer maintainers regularly and actively update and maintain the GST stack, I'm not sure what a message with just a link provides, did you have a particular query you wanted answered about the release in the context of Fedora?

Re: dmesg restricted to root in Rawhide

2024-02-28 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 at 13:38, Barry Scott wrote: > > > > On 28 Feb 2024, at 10:24, Karel Zak wrote: > > You can restore the original behavior by using: > ># sysctl kernel.dmesg_restrict=0 > > However, be aware of the security consequences ;-) > > > Given I can get the same information from jo

Re: Podman v5 breaking changes

2024-02-28 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 at 20:59, Gursewak Singh wrote: > > In Fedora 40, Podman has undergone a major version upgrade to v5 [1], > introducing some breaking changes. Notably, CNI networking support has been > discontinued in favor of Netavark, and cgroups v1 support has been deprecated > in favor

Re: A note about riscv64 changes

2024-02-14 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 at 12:07, David Abdurachmanov wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 12:49 PM Dan Horák wrote: > > > > On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 10:42:52 + > > "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 10:27:53A

Re: A note about riscv64 changes

2024-02-14 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi Richard, > A quick note that you may be seeing pull requests for riscv64 changes > against your packages, like these examples: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ghc/pull-request/7 > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/zlib-ng/pull-request/11 > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gdal/pull-re

Re: do we need CONFIG_UPROBES=y in our kernels?

2024-02-13 Thread Peter Robinson
> > In a german developer blog article was the topic raised, that with > > uprobes enabled, userland apps can i.e. circumvent tls security(and > > other protections), > > by telling the kernel to probe the function calls with the uprobes api. > > As this enables i.e. the hosting system of a vm or c

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

2024-01-27 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 at 16:39, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Dear maintainers. > > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages > should be retired from Fedora 40 approximately one week before branching. > > 5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happe

Re: rawhide aarch64 Thunderbird FTBFS "internal compiler error: Segmentation fault"

2024-01-25 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi, > Tried twice, same error, aarch64 build bails out with There's at least one known ICE on aarch64 for gcc-14 so I suggest checking if it looks related. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259937 > | 34:29.97 *** WARNING *** there are active plugins, do not report this as a > bug u

Re: Can't update from fedora 39 to rawhide

2024-01-24 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 at 13:04, Guinevere Larsen wrote: > > Hi Fedora list! > > I'm trying to upgrade a VM from fedora 39 to rawhide but running dnf > system-upgrade download --releasever=rawhide fails. the offending > package seems to be "grubby-8.40-73.fc39", which conflicts with > sdubby-1.0-5.fc

Re: F40 Change Proposal: Arm Minimal Image OS-Build (Self-Contained)

2024-01-18 Thread Peter Robinson
gt; == Summary == > > Build the Arm minimal image to be built using osbuild. > > > > == Owner == > > * Name: [[User:pbrobinson| Peter Robinson]] > > > > * Email: > > > > > > == Detailed Description == > > The Fedora Arm Minimal image is widely used

Re: Where to add new ssh key to my FAS account?

2024-01-10 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 at 11:55, Barry Scott wrote: > > I have been changing from SSH RSA key to using ed25519 based keys. > I cannot recall, or track down docs on where to upload my new ssh key to > for my FAS account. > > Can you point me in the right direction please? Login to https://accounts.fe

Re: ARM PAC on koji vs COPR

2024-01-04 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 9:08 PM Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > > > On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 at 15:01, Miroslav Suchý wrote: >> >> Dne 03. 01. 24 v 14:46 Jarek Prokop napsal(a): >> >> 4. Why do koji and copr have CPU flag set that differs so much? Is our koji >> infra OK? >> >> For convenience of readers: >

Re: RISC-V ABI issue with ULEB128

2024-01-02 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 5:15 PM David Abdurachmanov wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 6:26 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 2:05 PM David Abdurachmanov > > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 3:54 PM Florian Weimer wr

Re: RISC-V ABI issue with ULEB128

2024-01-02 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 2:05 PM David Abdurachmanov wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 3:54 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > > > > * David Abdurachmanov: > > > > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 1:09 PM Richard W.M. Jones > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >> I'm not sure exactly the effect on RISC-V binaries, but

Re: Building the boot.iso with dnf5

2023-12-09 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 7:35 PM Brian C. Lane wrote: > > With the approval of > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BuildWithDNF5 it seems like a > good time to move Lorax over to using dnf5 to create the boot.iso. My > current plan is to merge my dnf5 branch do a new build on Monday > (12/11).

Re: Possible deprecation/removal of Initial Setup from Fedora

2023-11-29 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 12:51 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 01:53:14PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 08:07:06AM -0800, Davide Cavalca wrote: > > > On 2023-11-21 04:34, Jiri Konecny wrote: > > > > Is Anaconda Initial Setup important for

Re: Possible deprecation/removal of Initial Setup from Fedora

2023-11-29 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sat, Nov 25, 2023 at 12:21 AM Leslie Satenstein via devel wrote: > > > > I am a devout anaconda bigot, and I exclusively use the Everything.iso with > it. > Of course, I use it via terminal mode. > > A feature I relish in anaconda, is the ability to manage disks and > partitions.(using the r

Re: Possible deprecation/removal of Initial Setup from Fedora

2023-11-29 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 12:39 PM Jiri Konecny wrote: > > Hi, > > I wonder, I thought that the server images are usually using Anaconda to > create a user during installation. Am I missing something? For example there's cases where a vendor ships the OS pre-installed on the device and they won't k

Re: Swift on aarch64 and 39 and Rawhide...suggestions?

2023-11-06 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 2:31 AM Ron Olson wrote: > > Hey all- > > I’m still having a difficult time trying to figure out what to do about this > issue I’m having. Swift 5.9 was released awhile ago and I’ve been able to > build it for x864_64 on all versions of Fedora (Rawhide, 39, 38, 37) just >

Re: FEDORA-2023-ed0c57b4ba — unspecified update for libtirpc — Fedora Updates System

2023-10-25 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 5:04 PM Steve Dickson wrote: > > Hello, > > This update failed [1] due to a system timeout [2] > not a test failure... Is there some way to override > or wave the failure. There should be a waive option on the right panel for the update in bodhi, and you can also retest fr

Re: status openssl1.1

2023-10-16 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 10:05 AM Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 10:21 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > > > > V Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 08:55:12AM +0200, josef radinger via devel napsal(a): > > > Hi > > > > > > openssl1.1 reached EOS on recently (11th September 2023 I assume) > > > https:

Re: Intention to tighten RPM crypto-policy back

2023-09-27 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 11:04 AM Alexander Sosedkin wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 7:47 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 10:20 AM Alexander Sosedkin > > wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > 6 months ago

Re: F39 Change Proposal: Allow Removal of tzdata (System-Wide)

2023-09-27 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 6:24 AM Remi Collet wrote: > > Le 26/09/2023 à 19:32, Carlos O'Donell a écrit : > > >> In version 8.3 (F40) we'll includes the UTC definition > >> in our patch to use system tzdata, UTC being use > >> as the fallback value. > > > > I'm curious; what does this patch look lik

Re: Intention to tighten RPM crypto-policy back

2023-09-26 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 10:20 AM Alexander Sosedkin wrote: > > Hello, > > 6 months ago, there's been a F38 blocker: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2960 > Long story short: > RPM has moved to sequoia, > sequoia has started respecting crypto-policies, > Google repos have been signed with a 1024-bit D

Re: Intention to tighten RPM crypto-policy back

2023-09-26 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 6:23 PM Alexander Sosedkin wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 7:47 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 11:19:18AM +0200, Alexander Sosedkin wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > 6 months ago, there's been a F38 blocker: > > > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2960

Re: Package fails to build for aarch64, works for x86_64

2023-09-21 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 3:25 PM Ron Olson wrote: > > Hey all- > > I was trying to submit the released version of Swift 5.9 to Fedora but I get > a build failure only for the aarch64 platform for Rawhide and F39: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2291751 (F39) > https://koj

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >