Hi all,
a new version rpkg-1.68 together with fedpkg-1.46 are released containing
both features and bugfixes.
Currently, all supported versions (Fedora 40, Fedora 41, Fedora 42, Fedora
Rawhide, EPEL 8, EPEL 9, EPEL 10) are present in stable repositories.
Changelog (web documentation):
https://docs
Hi all,
a new version rpkg-1.67 together with fedpkg-1.45 are released containing
both features and bugfixes.
Currently, all supported versions (Fedora 39, Fedora 40, Fedora rawhide,
EPEL 8, EPEL 9) are present in stable repositories.
Some subsequent fedpkg updates are waiting in Bodhi.
Changelog
Hi all,
a new version rpkg-1.66 together with fedpkg-1.44 are released containing
both features and bugfixes.
Currently, only Fedora 37 (and Rawhide) packages are present in stable
repositories.
Other supported packages are waiting in testing repositories and should be
available in stable in the ne
> Datum: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 10:38:23 +0100
> Von: Than Ngo
> An: Ondrej Nosek
>
>
> Am 21.11.22 um 10:29 schrieb Ondrej Nosek:
>
> Hi,
>
> I checked the functionality and for me, it worked.
> Could you, please, run it with "-v" debug argument?
>
Hi all,
a new version rpkg-1.65 together with fedpkg-1.43 are released containing
both features and bugfixes.
Currently, all supported packages are present in stable repositories.
Changelog (web documentation):
https://docs.pagure.org/rpkg/releases/1.65.html
https://docs.pagure.org/fedpkg/release
Hi all,
A few months ago fedpkg introduced a change which avoids downloading source
files (from dist-git) that are not used in the specfile and therefore
downloading them would be wasting of resources and time.
The original request was opened here [1] and implemented here [2]. The
logic is part of
Hi all,
a new version rpkg-1.64 together with fedpkg-1.42 are released containing
both features and bugfixes.
Currently, all supported packages are present in stable repositories.
Changelog (web documentation):
https://docs.pagure.org/rpkg/releases/1.64.html
https://docs.pagure.org/fedpkg/release
Hi all,
a new version rpkg-1.63 together with fedpkg-1.41 are released containing
both features and bugfixes.
Currently, packages for Fedora 34 are present in stable repositories.
Fedora 33, Fedora 35, epel7, epel8 are in the testing repositories. Feel
free to try these waiting distributions in Bo
Hi all,
a new version rpkg-1.62 together with fedpkg-1.40 are released containing
both features and bugfixes.
Currently, Fedora 33 and Fedora 32 are present in stable repositories.
epel7, epel8 are in the testing repositories, feel free to try these
waiting distributions in Bodhi. Version for epel
Hi all,
a new version rpkg-1.61 together with fedpkg-1.39 are released containing
both features and bugfixes. Some bugfixes were released earlier as patches.
Currently, Fedora 32, epel7, epel8 and rawhide packages are in the testing
repository, feel free to try these waiting distributions in Bodhi
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 11:42 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 20. 04. 20 v 1:31 Ondrej Nosek napsal(a):
>
> Thanks for answers, comment in the text follows.
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 12:16 PM clime wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 12:05, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>&g
Thanks for answers, comment in the text follows.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 12:16 PM clime wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 12:05, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >
> >
> > Dne 14. 04. 20 v 0:13 Ondrej Nosek napsal(a):
> >
> > TLDR: Is $SUBJ function reasonable t
TLDR: Is $SUBJ function reasonable to implement in fedpkg?
Hi,
some time ago, fedpkg issue tracker got a request [1] for method, that
allows direct builds. That means without sending srpms via "--srpm"
argument. Currently, user's changes can be built:
fedpkg scratch-build --srpm
This way, f
yes, I missed correcting the supported list.
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 12:56 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 30. 03. 20 12:21, Ondrej Nosek wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > a new version rpkg-1.60 is released containing both features and
> bugfixes.
> > Currently, Fedora 32 a
Hi all,
a new version rpkg-1.60 is released containing both features and bugfixes.
Currently, Fedora 32 and rawhide packages are in the stable repository,
feel free to try other waiting distributions in Bodhi.
Changelog (web documentation):
https://docs.pagure.org/rpkg/releases/1.60.html
Updates
Hi all,
a new version fedpkg-1.38 is released.
Currently, Fedora 30, 31, 32 and Rawhide packages are in the stable
repository, feel free to try other waiting distributions (el6, epel7) in
Bodhi.
Release description:
Feature documentation, changelog and fixes description can be seen here:
https://
Hi all,
a new version fedpkg-1.38 is released.
Currently, Fedora 30, 31, 32 and Rawhide packages are in the stable
repository, feel free to try other waiting distributions (el6, epel7) in
Bodhi.
Release description:
Feature documentation, changelog and fixes description can be seen here:
https://
s/?packages=rpkg&page=1
rpkg is available from PyPI.
Thanks to all contributors.
Regards
Ondrej Nosek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Cod
Hi all,
a new version rpkg-1.58 and fedpkg-1.37 is released.
Currently, Fedora 30 packages are in the stable repository, feel free to
try other waiting distributions in Bodhi.
Numerous features and improvements (as well as bugfixes) includes:
(For "rpkg")
- Improvements for scratch module builds
Hi all,
a new version fedpkg-1.36 is released.
This is mostly a bugfix update with some improvements. Most notable changes
are:
support for flatpack namespace (flatpaks will be added as a separate
namespace in Fedora dist-git)
fedpkg update will work for containers
Other changes, bugfix
builds=rpkg-1.57-2.fc28&builds=rpkg-1.57-2.fc29
Alternative link:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=rpkg&page=1
rpkg is available from PyPI.
Regards
Ondrej Nosek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscr
21 matches
Mail list logo
