I guess a "Red Hatter" doesn't have to be employed at Red Hat, but love and
believe in Red Hat and if not that... At least use it :-)
I'd call myself a Red Hatter, although I'm not employed at Red Hat.
-of
-Original Message-
From: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:devel-bou
Hi!
(Sorry for top-quote, but on mobile...)
Copy that and FHS states this quite clear. Personally I'm also not a huge fan
of software installing to /opt.
Neither am I a fan of packaging (local) libraries in there - for a variety of
reasons. I even think the Fedora packaging guidelines forbid th
Hi!
Who can check this?
DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: gdal-java-1.9.2-2.fc19.x86_64 (build)
DEBUG util.py:264: Requires: libcfitsio.so.0()(64bit)
DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: gdal-libs-1.9.2-2.fc19.x86_64 (build)
DEBUG util.py:264: Requires: libcfitsio.so.0()(
commit 6464aaef51e1baf40abfbb3c50f1738de2060d6c
Author: Oliver Falk
Date: Thu Jan 27 14:07:04 2011 +0100
* Thu Jan 27 2011 Oliver Falk - 0.01-17
- Rebuild for perl-5.12.3
perl-YAML-Parser-Syck.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl
Hi!
Just in case someone is looking for the list of her packages:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/mef
I don't have time to do any of these. However, I would love to see
someone taking over gernonimo*, ice, jarjar, javamail, maven*, pl... -
at least
Mary. Take your tim
Now plz send me a Z series and I'll take care about the updates :-P
-of
Phil Knirsch schrieb:
>Hi everyone!
>
>The Fedora s390x team[1] is happy to announce the first installable
>Fedora on IBM System Z (aka s390x) since Fedora 6!
>
>It's been a long time in the making, but after several Fedor
Use setarch!
-of
Frank Murphy schrieb:
>I have created a hybrid box for myself.
>
>Kernel.x86_64
>All else i686 + noarch (no problems encountered)
>
>bash-4.1$ uname -i (-m)
>x86_64
>
>How would I get\force it to return i686?
>
>
>--
>Regards,
>
>Frank Murphy
>UTF_8 Encoded, Fedora.x86_64/i686
Yeah. Kick out KDE! Use XFCE! Flamewar! *g*
Just jokin'...
I also agree with "Fine". Pkg maintainers are responsible for their pkgs. And
of course not everybody is able to fix any kind of bug...
Josephine Tannhäuser schrieb:
>2010/3/29, Michał Piotrowski :
>> I don't see any problem here
I had similar issues already and I totally agree with Christoph!
The maintainer should not redirect the bugreporter to the upstream bugreporting
plattform. I already have plenty of accounts on upstream bugzillas because of
exactly this...
-of
Christoph Wickert schrieb:
>I am irritated by the
Hi Jay!
On 02/23/2010 04:09 AM, Jay Hankinson wrote:
[ ... ]
> * Ingres requires that the server executable is setuid (non-root)
Actually I don't know any >rules< that speak against this. However, if
it's really needed, then we cannot really do anything against it. And if
there's a rule that
On 02/12/2010 03:03 PM, Oliver Falk wrote:
> On 01/29/2010 12:52 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> Bugzilla status for packages violating the Static Library guidelines:
>>
>> libdnet 556066
>> libstatgrab
On 01/29/2010 12:52 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Bugzilla status for packages violating the Static Library guidelines:
>
> libdnet 556066
> libstatgrab 556075
Done!
I'm sending a separate mail regarding syck - strange compile error :-/
Am 03.02.2010 20:39, schrieb Alain Portal:
> I should want to know which is the process to request to comaintain a package.
Ask the main maintainer. If he/she is OK with your request, you can
request the ACLs on the pkgdb.
-of
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fe
13 matches
Mail list logo
