the antlr3-C package in Fedora (bug #966973).
Regards,
Norvald H. Ryeng
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Mon, 06 May 2013 16:42:43 +0200, Rahul Sundaram
wrote:
Hi
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 4:13 AM, Norvald H. Ryeng wrote:
I see review requests on the list for new packages that people want into
F19, so I don't see how it could be too late for upgrading an existing
package.
I don&#x
requests on the list for new packages that people want into
F19, so I don't see how it could be too late for upgrading an existing
package.
Regards,
Norvald H. Ryeng
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Please log this in the package review. Let's proceed with the rest of the
review and look at renaming as a separate issue later.
Regards,
Norvald H. Ryeng
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
;s doable. And it would solve much of our headache. At least, I
think it's worth considering.
Regards,
Norvald H. Ryeng
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 18:03:18 +0100, Honza Horak wrote:
On 03/13/2013 09:27 AM, Norvald H. Ryeng wrote:
We now changed the Requires in akonadi-mysql to mariadb-server to be
sure of what we get.
This dependency is a problem. It makes it impossible to install
MySQL-server on a KDE system since
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 18:08:55 +0100, Honza Horak wrote:
On 03/13/2013 09:27 AM, Norvald H. Ryeng wrote:
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:25:02 +0100, Honza Horak
wrote:
On 03/12/2013 01:14 PM, Norvald H. Ryeng wrote:
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 19:58:03 +0100, Kevin Kofler
wrote:
Honza Horak wrote
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 23:31:46 +0100, Kevin Kofler
wrote:
Norvald H. Ryeng wrote:
This dependency is a problem. It makes it impossible to install
MySQL-server on a KDE system since mariadb-server and MySQL-server
conflict.
That just shows how broken it is to have both in Fedora at the same
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:25:02 +0100, Honza Horak wrote:
On 03/12/2013 01:14 PM, Norvald H. Ryeng wrote:
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 19:58:03 +0100, Kevin Kofler
wrote:
Honza Horak wrote:
This doesn't solve all the issues -- if package like akonadi-mysql
says
"Requires: mysql-server&quo
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:33:21 +0100, Honza Horak wrote:
On 03/12/2013 02:03 PM, Norvald H. Ryeng wrote:
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 19:00:29 +0100, Honza Horak
wrote:
if I understand it correctly that the problem is caused by conflicting
library names, then it should be solved today (the enhanced
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 17:59:50 +0100, Honza Horak wrote:
On 03/06/2013 02:44 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Norvald H. Ryeng
wrote:
In practice, this means that it will be almost impossible to install
MySQL
in Fedora. The recipe in the feature page [1] requires
ng the version of the
original libmysqlclient.so from 18 to 1018) is a hack and not a
long-term solution.
Regards,
Norvald H. Ryeng
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
provides real-mysql*, epoch 1
mysql*provides real-mysql*, epoch 0
Using alternatives could also be considered. In any case, the packages
have to be installable in parallel.
Regards,
Norvald H. Ryeng
(*) The name "MySQL" crashes with the standalone packages at
dev.mysql
On Tue, 05 Mar 2013 19:14:25 +0100, Honza Horak wrote:
On 03/05/2013 11:07 AM, Norvald H. Ryeng wrote:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 16:17:00 +0100, Tom Lane wrote:
The way this worked in the past (and still does on RHEL and some other
distros) is that MySQL AB provided RPMs named "MySQL&quo
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 16:17:00 +0100, Tom Lane wrote:
"Norvald H. Ryeng" writes:
We want to keep the MySQL package in Fedora and are willing to
co-maintain
or take over maintainership if nobody else will do it. We haven't really
discussed this with the current maintainers ye
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 03:30:01 +0100, Toshio Kuratomi
wrote:
"Norvald H. Ryeng" writes:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:07:22 +0100, Rahul Sundaram
Well, unless Oracle as upstream wants to get involved as downstream
maintainers in Fedora as well. They did offer to do that but don't
iscussions
on this list it seems they're not interested in maintaining the package
after F19. If us stepping up changes that, we are happy to co-maintain.
Any input on how we can and should proceed is welcome.
Regards,
Norvald H. Ryeng
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fed
17 matches
Mail list logo
