On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 3:46 PM Michel Lind wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2025-01-06 at 12:45 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I propose we retire python-nose from Fedora 43+ immediately after
> > branching.
> >
> > The package has been deprecated for 5 years:
> >
> >https://fedoraproject.or
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 12:19 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 16. 07. 24 17:08, Mark E. Fuller via devel wrote:
> > But the magic switch I need appears to be:
> >
> > %global __python3 /usr/bin/python3.12
>
> And:
>
> %global python3_pkgversion 3.12
>
> Some packages successfully build without this
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 4:36 PM Kenneth Goldman wrote:
>
> Is it possible for a .spec file to clone a github.com repo rather than
> download a tarball? Can someone link to a working example?
Git clones are bulky, with the entire history of a project rather than
merely the state of the repo at the
On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 12:35 AM Tom Stellard wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> After each Fedora release we do a retrospective with the LLVM package
> maintainers
> and talk about how we can improve the LLVM packages[1] in Fedora. We've come
> up
> with some ideas for Fedora 41 that we'd like to share to rai
nsumed thousands if not millions of man-hours of sysadmin
time since UNIX was invented.
Nico Kadel-Garcia
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 6:43 PM Maxwell G wrote:
>
> On Thu Jan 25, 2024 at 20:34 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Hello.
>
> Hi Miro,
>
> Thanks for the announcement!
>
> > Now when python-flit-core has been split out of python-flit, I do no longer
> > have a use-case for python-flit and hence I ha
On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 5:39 AM Sandro wrote:
>
> On 27-08-2023 06:33, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
> > I am the maintainer of python-PyPDF2 for Fedora (which I do since I
> > was interested in pdf-stapler that I also maintain as a consequence).
> > For a while now, upstream has been wanting all
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 8:34 AM Xiaojie Chen wrote:
>
> Hi，I am interesting in the upgrading of perl. Where can I find the detailed
> process of upgrading and building Perl, including the entire build steps, the
> list of built RPM packages, and the building order of Perl module packages?
Out o
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 4:43 PM Chuck Anderson wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 02:08:25PM -0400, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > Personally I would have preferred to call this a new tool versus trying to
> > use dnf name still. It makes it clearer that the break is going to happen.
>
> I propose "qz
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 9:18 AM Marcin Juszkiewicz
wrote:
>
> W dniu 29.06.2023 o 14:57, David Both pisze:
> > I have noticed that uw-imap is no longer in the Fedora repo and that the
> > last was F33. I like it far better than the other options because it is
> > the IMAP server that best "does on
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 5:02 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> I don't think that GCC is always the best example to follow.
>
> Nevertheless, wouldn't it be worth of phasing out the /lib64? I don't
> know what is the history behind, but I don't think this layout is
> conceptual.
>
>
> Vít
Until, and unle
On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 7:06 AM Geraldo Simião Kutz
wrote:
>
> Testing F38 KDE spin today, I see this:
> Delta RPMs reduced 235.2 MB to 23.8 MB (89.9%)
>
> So, it seems we do still have some cornercases when deltaRPM shows its value.
Not really. That's local dis, but the aggregate burden of regula
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 10:17 AM Maxwell G wrote:
>
> On Fri Feb 17, 2023 at 08:37 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 7:51 AM Andreas Schneider wrote:
> > > It downloads packages from the internet and doesn't use system rust
> > > pack
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 7:51 AM Andreas Schneider wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, 30 November 2022 18:43:50 CET Mauricio Teixeira wrote:
> > Fabio,
>
> Hi Fabio,
>
> > What is so bad about the COPR package that can't be used in the main repo?
>
> It downloads packages from the internet and doesn't use sy
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 8:31 PM Reon Beon via devel
wrote:
>
> Are there still some outstanding bugs preventing this from happening?
Is there any one critical feature that justifies the update? Avoiding
the requirement of python is... OK, maybe understandable, but I don't
see it as a "must-have"
On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 1:23 PM Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> On 2023-01-28 00:14, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > If there is a problem with not uodating dependencies when you do an
> > install or an update on selected packages, the packages dependencies
> > are not properly defined.
>
>
> By definition,
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 12:02 PM Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 12:59:19AM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 7:01 AM Ralf Corsépius wrote:
> > >
> > > Am 28.12.22 um 11:49 schrieb Peter Boy:
> > > >
>
down
gracefully, but risk the upstream server if clients are forcefully
shut down.
Nico Kadel-Garcia
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https:
line, I should use %dnl?
When I do things like this, I also replace '%" with "%%" at every
instance within the commented out line to avoid just this issue. I do
the same thing in %changelog. You may find this to be more effective.
On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 5:57 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 03/12/2022 00:30, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > The proposal now is to keep ImageMagick 6 and make a new package with
> > ImageMagick 7 , when we have all applications use only ImageMagick 7,
> > we move the sources from ImageMagick7
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 3:56 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 3:36 PM Ron Olson wrote:
> >
> > Unfortunately I can’t get that rhel+epel8 to work, as it complains “ERROR:
> > /etc/pki/entitlement is not a directory is subscription-manager
> > installed?”. I went through all the o
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 8:27 AM Milan Crha wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2022-09-08 at 12:20 +0200, Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
> > DNF5 is completely a different component. It does not depend like
> > microdnf on Python. DNF plugins are not compatible with DNF5. There
> > will be changes in commands, options, out
On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 10:52 AM Michael J Gruber wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 2:01 PM Sandro >
> > pyproject does not work well, and is not backwards compatible. This is
> > particularly a problem for EPEL ports from Fedora. Personally, I'd
> > like to see it fixed for EPEL before relying
On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 2:01 PM Sandro wrote:
> Thank you, Miro, for the explanation and the pull request. I remember
> switching away from setup.cfg after being told that pyproject.toml is
> the way forward. I must have missed the fact that this required a newer
> minimum version of setuptools.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 2:05 AM Tomáš Popela wrote:
>
> Hi Sérgio,
>
> Dne so 27. 8. 2022 21:53 uživatel Sérgio Basto napsal:
>>
>> As Kevin Kofler (more or less) wrote in "Pcre Deprecation" thread,
>> maybe we should be prepared to support pcre-1 forever and IMO we also
>> can extend the concept
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 9:16 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Chris Murphy wrote:
> > Summary: Windows 10/11 increasingly enables Bitlocker (full disk
> > encryption) out of the box with the encryption key sealed in the TPM.
> […]
> > The Bitlocker encryption key is unsealed only if the boot c
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 4:07 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Chris Murphy wrote:
> > a. Fix GRUB by giving it the ability to modify UEFI NRAM "bootnext" value,
> > so that instead of chainloading the Windows bootloader from GRUB, GRUB
> > will modify the system NVRAM such that the next boot (
On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 5:14 AM Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 11:02 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>>
>> On 22. 06. 22 21:05, Vipul Siddharth wrote:
>> > We are going to deprecate openssl1.1 package, stop shipping the
>> > corresponding devel package, and stop respecting crypto
her ansible-core requirements, such as
the python38-resolvelib update and python38-pbr. I've tried before to
assemble the credentials and permissions to build EPEL packages
myself, but have been balked so far by the variety of registration
requirements. I'm willing to put those in my
On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 2:50 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
>
>
> On 18. 06. 22 2:33, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Sat, 2022-06-18 at 00:31 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Interesting bugzillas:
>
> fedpkg: FTBFS in Fedora Rawhide with bodhi-client 6: Failed to establish
> a ne
On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 3:32 PM David Sommerseth wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been trying to complete the OpenVPN 3 Linux v18_beta release in my
> Fedora Copr repository for EPEL-9. But there seems to be something odd
> going on here. I tried to reach out on IRC earlier today but didn't get
> much f
On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 4:18 AM Michael J Gruber wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 3:32 PM David Sommerseth > wrote:
> >
> > I'm surprised that the EPEL 9 chroots haven't switched to RHEL 9 yet.
> > We've had RHEL 9 + EPEL 9 configs for almost a month now...
> >
> > Pavel, do you know when they
On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 6:55 PM Stewart Smith via devel
wrote:
>
> Maxwell G via devel writes:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I have been de-facto maintaining containerd in Fedora as a member of the go-
> > sig for a little while now, as the previous maintainer no longer has time to
> > do. In addition
On Sat, May 28, 2022 at 2:53 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 28/05/2022 19:31, drago01 wrote:
> > That's incorrect. They can be outdated, but there is no inherit reason
> > why they have to be.
>
> Most upstreams don't care about bundled libraries. They bundle them once
> and then forget
On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 3:01 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> I'm going change this thread to epel-devel ,
>
> On Fri, 2022-05-27 at 11:40 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
>
> Shared message to address an issue below.
>
>
> Forwarded Message
> Subject: ImageMagick in EPEL 8
> Date: Wed,
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 9:08 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 8:13 PM Owen Taylor wrote:
> >
> > For years, Red Hat Linux / Fedora systems have had a umask of 0002 for
> > regular users as part of the "user private group" scheme [*]. Basically the
> > idea is that you can set a
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 2:55 PM Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/16/22 12:10, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 3:20 PM przemek klosowski via devel
>
> >
> >
> >> Unfortunately, I believe that the current upgrade workflow requires a
> >> root disk three times the total installed packag
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 12:14 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 8:07 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > An in-place system upgrade is not an "unexpected event". It is a risky
> > transaction.
> >
> > The big space pig is not /var/lib/rpm: it&
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 6:39 AM Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> On 5/13/22 21:54, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > So I went to do a dnf system-upgrade from F35 to F36 on a test machine,
> > as part of my usual testing. In the middle of the process, it appears
> > that /var filled up and that left the
Ooops: forgot the awk statement:
dnf clean all --enablerepo=*
dnf check-update | grep '^[a-zA-Z0-0]' | awk '{print $1}' |while
read name; do
dnf update "$name" -y
done
On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 8:35 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> On
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 2:54 PM Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>
> So I went to do a dnf system-upgrade from F35 to F36 on a test machine,
> as part of my usual testing. In the middle of the process, it appears
> that /var filled up and that left the system in an unfortunate state.
> Surprisingly (t
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:28 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 10/05/2022 18:00, Ben Beasley wrote:
> > Could you please elaborate on why this form is better?
>
> For building on RHEL without EPEL being enabled.
>
> > At minimum, “%if 0%{?rhel} && 0%{?rhel} == 8” is exactly equivalent to
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 11:49 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 11:38 PM Demi Marie Obenour
> wrote:
> >
> > On 4/28/22 07:09, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 9:08 PM Demi Marie Obenour
> > > wrote:
> > >>
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 9:08 PM Demi Marie Obenour
wrote:
>
> On 4/27/22 07:40, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 09:03:45PM -0500, Carl George wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 1:25 PM Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hello everyone,
> >>>
> >>> Th
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 2:10 PM Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden
wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> There is an ancient version of Puppet in EPEL-7. Version 3.6 has been
> EOL for ages now. https://binford2k.com/2016/11/22/puppet-3.x-eol/ has a
> nice EOL overview:
>
> * Puppet 3 - 2016-12-31
> * Puppet 4 -
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 6:41 AM Paul Howarth wrote:
>
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 12:26:54 +0100
> Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
>
> > On 10/03/2022 11:55, Alex wrote:
> > > May I suggest to leave at least the telnet protocol in curl-minimal
> > > for debugging purposes.
> >
> > Telnet is an extremel
On Sun, Mar 6, 2022 at 8:51 AM Jonathan Dieter wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm orphaning deltarpm because, as it's currently used in Fedora, it's
> not very effective, bugs keep getting opened against it because it's
> not working as well as it should (mostly an infra issue as opposed to a
> probl
"uninitalized variables" is generally easy to fix in the source code.
Has the author dropped the project, the last update in the github repo
is frm at least 3 years ago.
On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 4:28 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> It seems to fail with gcc 12 due to uninitialized variables. That's eas
On Sun, Jan 9, 2022 at 6:58 PM Peter Boy wrote:
>
>
>
> > Am 10.01.2022 um 00:25 schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia :
> >
> > ... it has gotten out of hand.
>
> Indeed. When Gnome 3 hit Fedora years ago, I tried hard, but then decided
> heavy heartedly to switch all
On Sun, Jan 9, 2022 at 6:02 PM Peter Boy wrote:
> > Am 09.01.2022 um 23:43 schrieb None Business :
> >
> > I use(d) fedora to run my IDEs ( c++), now it is all floating-contracting
> > windows , with gazilion 'drag-your-window' nonsense . I guess I am not cool
> > enough to use this clusterfu..
ng it at boot time running at the same time other RPM
updates. I do hope the scripting will exit gracefully if /usr
overflows or is unwriteable for other reasons, such as being part of
the "immutable" Linux concept.
Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 8:30 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
&g
On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 7:53 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 7:53 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 3:39 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 8:58 AM Fabio Valentini
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 4:03 PM Ben Cott
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 2:34 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 04/01/2022 19:36, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > #!/usr/bin/env python3
>
> Forbidden by Python guidelines too.
Can you point to where that is forbidden? Because it remains quite
popular for various working
On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 8:11 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 04. 01. 22 13:57, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > On 04/01/2022 11:09, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> We have some scripts that are dual Python 2/Python 3, and Fedora tooling
> >> forced us to carry a downstream-only patch to replace /usr/b
On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 3:32 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 30/12/2021 12:58, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> > This has not been decided yet, but likely the Fedora kernel will
> > contain the official Fedora keys, and the user will decide to add
> > new keys (including those from COPR).
>
> 1.
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 3:36 PM Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 29 Dec 2021 at 13:51, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>>
>> On 12/29/21 09:59, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> > The modern day case where /usr is read-only is inside a container and
>> > you put an overlay or using some sort of lin
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 12:48 PM Gordon Messmer
wrote:
>
> On 12/29/21 07:26, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > On 29/12/2021 16:01, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >> Currently, the RPM databases is located in `/var`. Let's move it to
> >> `/usr`. The move is already under way in rpm-ostree-based
> >> inst
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 1:35 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 11:03 AM Stephen Snow wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2021-12-29 at 06:38 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > With Windows 11, they're *mandatory*. Corporate policies now
> > > effectively *require* TPM-based mechanisms *in addition*
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 6:39 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 6:06 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 5:42 AM Roberto Sassu via devel
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: Nico Kadel-Garcia [mailto:nka...@gmail.com]
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 5:42 AM Roberto Sassu via devel
wrote:
>
> > From: Nico Kadel-Garcia [mailto:nka...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2021 10:29 AM
>
> [...]
>
> > From one of the patches:
> >
> > It accomplishes this ta
On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 8:07 PM Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> On 12/28/21 16:45, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 4:35 AM Mattia Verga via devel
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Il 28/12/21 04:28, Kevin Kofler via devel ha scritto:
> >>> But ev
all any software they want, it
> is about preventing unwanted/unsolicited/malevolent software from being
> installed without user (admin) approval.
This looks like pure DRM. While there are security benefits to
controlling access to data or to executables, doing so deep in the
kernel takes
o F36? How about 3rd party
> repositories?
It wouldn't be the first time software has been deliberately broken by
well-intended kernel security changes. Remember when systemd decided
to cancel all backgrounded processes belong to a user when they logged
out, breaking "screen" and &
On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 4:38 PM Mikhail Gavrilov
wrote:
>
> Thanks, for answer. I build every day rpm packages from git locally with
> mock. And every build erases the contents of the `/var/lib/mock`. I did not
> save build log and I suppose that the rpm package itself does not contain
> inform
I see there is a more specific thread where just these issues have
been discussed. I'll take this over to
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/issues/755 . to avoid
cluttering a general Fedora maliling list.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@list
On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 3:35 AM Alejandro Saez Morollon wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 5:01 AM Matthew Miller
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 02:22:24PM +0100, Alejandro Saez Morollon wrote:
>> > A hypothetical new release cycle would look like this:
>> >
>> >- Fedora N releas
On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 6:14 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 18. 12. 21 v 22:09 Nico Kadel-Garcia napsal(a):
> > Discarding RHEL 7 and CentOS 7 for
> > EPEL, and by implication Amazon Linux 2, will discourage people
> > further from using RHEL based releases at all
On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 8:03 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 4:16 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 1:55 PM Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > I'm glad I can announce that
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 3:54 PM Ben Beasley wrote:
>
> It looks like python-pytest-cov was recently updated to 3.0.0 in F35[1]
> and F34[2]. I noticed this because, between my own packages and those
> maintained through @neuro-sig, I saw a wave of FTBFS notifications from
> Koschei.
It's been scr
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 1:55 PM Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I'm glad I can announce that we have a new release of Mock. See the full
> release notes [1]. The major change that happened is the removal of
> 'epel-8' config files, as a follow-up for [2] discussion (and of course on
> *devel
On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 11:21 AM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
> The thing is, the path stripping of %doc path/to/README is a feature. The
> directory path in the sources is not necessarily useful to replicate in the
> installed documentation directory. Removing that path stripping would be an
> i
On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 5:46 AM Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> On 12/5/21 05:07, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > I've been trying to bundle the current ansible-5.0.1 release as an RPM
> > for Fedora and EPEL use. Leaving aside the peculiar decisions to
> > replace the pypi
On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 8:09 PM Maxwell G wrote:
>
> On Monday, December 6, 2021 6:43:57 PM CST Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 3:59 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On 05/12/2021 04:07, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > &
On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 3:59 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 05/12/2021 04:07, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > This breaks building RPMs for EPEL 8 or Fedora, because the '%doc' and
> > '%license' macros strip off the subdirectories of the files and
&
On Sun, Dec 5, 2021 at 8:15 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> openssh 8.8p1 (just released in Rawhide) cannot connect to older
> servers. The error is:
>
> Unable to negotiate with [server] port 22: no matching host key type found.
> Their offer: ssh-rsa,ssh-dss
>
> It seems like the cut-off po
On Sun, Dec 5, 2021 at 10:51 AM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> The webkit2gtk3 package has a %add_to_license_files macro that you can
> copy as a workaround, but you might not be satisfied because it
> requires listing each affected file individually
I have no moral issue with listing them indi
On Sun, Dec 5, 2021 at 1:49 AM Otto Urpelainen wrote:
>
> Nico Kadel-Garcia kirjoitti 5.12.2021 klo 5.07:
> > I've been trying to bundle the current ansible-5.0.1 release as an RPM
> > for Fedora and EPEL use. Leaving aside the peculiar decisions to
> > replace the py
Aarggh, I had a cat attacking my hands at one moment. I meant:
/usr/share/doc/%}package}-%{version}/README.md
/usr/share/doc/%{package}-%{version}/LICENSE.md
On Sat, Dec 4, 2021 at 10:07 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> I've been trying to bundle the current an
I've been trying to bundle the current ansible-5.0.1 release as an RPM
for Fedora and EPEL use. Leaving aside the peculiar decisions to
replace the pypi.org "ansible" tarball with a tarball of roughly 150
modules from the "ansiblee-collections" repos, and moving the actual
ansible software to a dis
On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 1:39 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> I'd like to provide an ld.so command as part of glibc. Today, ld.so can
> be used to activate preloading, for example. Compared to LD_PRELOAD,
> the difference is that it's specific to one process, and won't be
> inherited by subprocesses—
On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 7:06 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 2:02 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 8:26 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 6:19 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia
> > > wrote:
&g
@Miroslav Suchý asked me to sum up my suggestions for using internal
mirrors more clearly, So, adding to his published Google Doc:
5 - Use internal RHEL mirrors.
It's difficult to license multiple RHEL releases and enable multiple
yum dnf or yum channels and supported RHEL or CentOS releases and
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 5:50 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 11:30 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >
> > It's also Friday right after Thanksgiving, "Black Friday". And most
> > python modules .spec files, which use pypi.org as their so
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 4:39 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 8:37 PM Susi Lehtola
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > I am experiencing problems updating packages employing GitHub source
> > URLs. For instance,
> >
> > $ spectool -g python-pyscf.spec
> > Downloading:
> > https://g
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 8:26 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 6:19 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 3:05 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > >
> > > Dne 22. 11. 21 v 15:00 Pavel Raiskup napsal(a):
> > > > Hello
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 3:05 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 22. 11. 21 v 15:00 Pavel Raiskup napsal(a):
> > Hello Fedora EPEL maintainers!
> >
> > First I don't feel comfortable announcing this, I'm not happy about the
> > situation and so I don't want to be the lightning rod :-). But I believe
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 9:16 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > Neither of those have much track history.
>
> Of course they don't. How can they, when CentOS had stolen their show for
> years and the sudden "change of directions&q
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 7:31 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > First I don't feel comfortable announcing this, I'm not happy about the
> > situation and so I don't want to be the lightning rod :-). But I believe
> > that we can come to acceptable Copr/Mock solution and
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 9:01 AM Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>
> Hello Fedora EPEL maintainers!
>
> First I don't feel comfortable announcing this, I'm not happy about the
> situation and so I don't want to be the lightning rod :-). But I believe
> that we can come to acceptable Copr/Mock solution and th
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 8:00 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> Company internal only is a rarity these days with cloud deployments
> and people putting Alexa's and similar devices on the company
> internet. That 'smart fridge' in the company workroom or 'smart tv' in
> the executive lounge is both
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 8:02 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2021-10-26 at 16:42 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> > Hello team,
> >
> > I would like to let you know ImageMagick-6.9.12-26 recently landed
> > upstream.
>
> Hello , when you update from 6.9.11 to 6.9.12, we need rebuild all
> de
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 8:52 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 2:24 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > FWIW, I think the upstream renaming of ansible and ansible-core is something
> > that we just have to accept. But we have some
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 2:24 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> FWIW, I think the upstream renaming of ansible and ansible-core is something
> that we just have to accept. But we have some flexibility in how this is
> packaged in Fedora.
>
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 09:34:34PM -, David M
Is it worth paying hundreds of MBytes of installer space, and the new
2 GB minimum RAM to simply install Fedora? I'm not saying "discard
anaconda". I'm saying "be aware of some very real reasons the
installer has gotten so huge". And keep it in mind for your own
projects.
On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 4
On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 3:36 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2021, 10:01 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> I still remember how Red Hat Linux and (IIRC) Fedora Core 1 could be booted
>> from a floppy (older Red Hat Linux releases even had a fully functioning
>> rescue
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 10:22 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 08:51:46PM -0500, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I have a couple comments/questions about this change.
> >
> > How will this effect EPEL? Is the plan to keep Ansible 2.9 there for
> > now?
>
>
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 3:03 PM Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> On 10/15/21 16:29, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >
> > I would publish ansible-core as just that, with a "Provides: ansible
> > %{version{-%{release}" and even "Obsoletes: ansible >= %{version}&qu
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 11:39 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 07:44:12PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 7:29 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 4:32 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > &
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 7:29 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 4:32 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ansible5
> >
> > == Summary ==
> >
> > The ansible project has re-organized how they release and
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 4:32 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ansible5
>
> == Summary ==
>
> The ansible project has re-organized how they release and distribute
> ansible. This change moves Fedora to be in sync with those changes and
> retires the old 'ansible class
1 - 100 of 602 matches
Mail list logo
