The ship on POSIX mandating vi (and defining it's behavior) sailed years
ago.
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020, 4:11 PM Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 10:55, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > > I came here with peace. Let's face it. It's always between the two. I
> > > respect vim and I learned
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 07:04:51PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 26/06/20 13:23 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > Heres a thought that I hadn't considered before though, and it might be
> > useful.
> > Apple at one point (and still may), shiped iphones without the itune
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 10:43:10AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-06-26 at 13:37 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > >
> > > Mint's default seems to be nano, though like openSUSE, it is doing this
> > > some way other than by setting $EDITOR.
> > &
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 10:15:45AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-06-26 at 12:39 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> >
> > Also, have we asked the question, what default editor are other distros
> > setting?
> > I've honestly never looked.
>
> The C
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 10:03:12AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-06-26 at 12:58 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > > From this thread you can find at least two people (me and Ben
> > > Rosser)
> > > who definitely didn't keep using vi (my very next que
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 12:38:40PM -0400, Ben Rosser wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 12:32 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 01:18:59PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > == Scope ==
> > > * Proposal owners:
> > > ** Modify comps to include nano Fedora wide.
> >
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 08:54:42AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-06-26 at 11:42 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > is interesting, both for the explicit fact that 1,000,000 people had to ask
> > how to exit vi (bad), and for the more subtle implicit fact that, at least
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 08:50:09AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-06-26 at 10:33 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 09:00:58AM -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 08:43:19AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > > > Do
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 02:01:05PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 26/06/20 08:43 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 01:27:54PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > > On 26/06/20 09:22 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
> > > > Really do we believe that se
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 03:42:39PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 26/06/20 10:33 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 09:00:58AM -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 08:43:19AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > > > Do we have re
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 09:00:58AM -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 08:43:19AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > Do we have real stasitics on this (somthing in the form of bz reports or
> > comments on a list) indicating that users actually are frustr
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 01:27:54PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 26/06/20 09:22 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
> > Really do we believe that setting nano as a default editor will attract new
> > users to Linux? How many end users in last years use Debian because of the
> > default editor change?
Anyone interested in a review swap? I've got the python-npyscreen package thats
waiting for a review which I'd like to write a few applications using, but I'd
like it integrated before I move to much farther forward:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782532
Neil
__
ronment, and run it, while pointing to the installed binaries that
you are trying to test :)
Neil
>
> Vít
>
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/429f883210f8b2b38ea310f7fc6636cd0e456d5c
>
> [2] https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/issues/735
>
>
> D
Hey all-
I was starting to setup CI for one of my packages in Fedora (cscope),
which requires that I have access to the sources to run my test (cscope uses its
own source tree to search for various symbols to confirm that its working
properly). Getting the sources in the CI environment is
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 06:31:46AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> Hello,
> as per subject, what is the stance on dropping anything there from a
> rpm ? Either marked as %{config} or not ?
>
> My naive reading of the Packaging guidelines is that nothing should be
> dropped in there by a package, but th
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 03:00:58PM -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-10-06 at 14:02 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> >
> > Try running 'iptables-save' before you start docker, and then running
> > 'iptables-save' after. Diff the results. Did docker remove
> > anything?
>
> Hello,
>
e different based on configuration in
no way precludes the two systems (docker and libvirt) from being in conflict.
Neil
>
> 2016-10-06 22:18 GMT+03:00 Neil Horman :
> > On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 02:02:09PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2016-10-06 at 12:39 -0600, Na
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 02:02:09PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-10-06 at 12:39 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> > On Thu, 2016-10-06 at 14:28 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > >
> > > I rarely mess with docker, but I expect that the docker0 bridge has
>
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 11:08:21AM -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have an issue that likely needs a bug or something to fix but I'm
> not sure which component is at fault. So I'm writing here in the hopes
> that someone will know where to point me.
>
> I have a F24 Workstati
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 01:27:33AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 04:13:06PM -0800, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> > On 12/17/2015 01:43 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> > >For docker containers, or containers, which don't want systemd, the current
> > >"Requires: systemd" i
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:18:10PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 17.12.2015 um 22:11 schrieb Neil Horman:
> >On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:04:48PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >>Am 17.12.2015 um 22:00 schrieb Neil Horman:
> >>>On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 0
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:04:48PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 17.12.2015 um 22:00 schrieb Neil Horman:
> >On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 03:39:17PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> >>What you're arguing is that *build* convenience for our current architecture
>
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 03:39:17PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015, at 01:19 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> >
> > In either case, you're going to wind up butchering a fair amount of what
> > the rpm
> > is going to be doing anyway. If its so im
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 05:18:21PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 17.12.2015 um 17:03 schrieb Reindl Harald:
> >
> >
> >Am 17.12.2015 um 16:57 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> >>On Thu, 17.12.15 10:50, Matthew Miller (mat...@fedoraproject.org) wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 04:40:16P
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:25:17AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 08:28:13AM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> > I would question why its necessecary to keep systemd out so ardently.
> > If you build your container layers properly, you can effectively put
> &
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 04:54:39PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 17.12.15 10:44, Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015, at 10:24 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >
> > > Can you give realistic examples for these? Can you explain what you
> > > are intend
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:02:43AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015, at 08:28 AM, Neil Horman wrote:
> >
> > I would question why its necessecary to keep systemd out so ardently. If
> > you
> > build your container layers properly, you can effectively
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:43:32AM +0100, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> For docker containers, or containers, which don't want systemd, the current
> "Requires: systemd" in a lot of packages is preventing building a minimal
> image.
>
> To improve the situation, we could make use of the new rpm weak depe
Hey all-
I'd like to unretire and take ownership of metapixel:
https://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/schani/metapixel/
There hasn't been a release in several years, but its got continual updates in a
few upstream git trees:
https://github.com/schani/metapixel/commits/master
I've managed to
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:34:47AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 30.3.2015 v 22:17 Neil Horman napsal(a):
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:27:17AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 09:55 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 01:37:23PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 16:17 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:27:17AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 09:55 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> > > >
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:27:17AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 09:55 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> >
> > > On 03/30/2015 08:39 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> > > >
> > > > There are currently no flags set at all.
> > >
> > >
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 03:48:23PM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 09:39:31AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Petr Šabata wrote:
> >
> > >> Bug 815617: PATCH: properly deal with crypt() returning NULL (1043 days
> > >> old)
> > >>https://bugzilla.redha
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 03:59:46PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Is there a good description of ELF shared library symbol versioning best
> practices somewhere?
>
> In particular, under what conditions do you need to create a new section in
> the versioning file given to the linker's --version-scr
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 07:34:51AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 07:13:27 -0400
> Neil Horman wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Dennis, I've been considering retiring the coda package here soon
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 08:51:06AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
>
> We merged in the side tags on May 27, and on June 6 kicked off the
> mass rebuild. we are currently about 1/3rd of the way through.
>
> You can see the current list o
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 07:36:37AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> Hey all-
> I've got a new package up for review and I'd like to expidite it:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1097426
>
> Its the DPDK:
> http://dpdk.org
>
> willing to do a r
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:34:43PM -0600, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> Greetings, All:
>
> I have a bug 1083039 where basically an application logs everything
> to syslog making a mess out of /var/log/messages. The logging facility
> is configurable and the default is local0.
>
> I'm toying with an idea
Hey all-
I've got a new package up for review and I'd like to expidite it:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1097426
Its the DPDK:
http://dpdk.org
willing to do a review swap if anyone is interested
Thanks
Neil
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 01:25:52PM +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> On 03/21/2014 01:18 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> > Can anyone point me to fedora packaging documentation that discusses
> > the need for API stability in packaged shared libraries? I'm sure we
> > have some
Hey all-
Can anyone point me to fedora packaging documentation that discusses the
need for API stability in packaged shared libraries? I'm sure we have some
requirement that APIs in a DSO need to be versioned and maintained through a
release, but for the life of me I'm unable to find it.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 04:58:34AM +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2013-10-22, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 03:03:44PM +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> >> Is it healty to execute rpmbuild while building a package?
> >>
> >> I have tests for perl
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 03:03:44PM +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> Is it healty to execute rpmbuild while building a package?
>
> I have tests for perl dependencency generator filters. I.e. the tests
> build a package using rpmbuild with redefeined all the `_*dir' macros,
> then use librpm to query req
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 07:09:16AM -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
> On 08/29/2013 04:28 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> >On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 01:06:23PM -0700, Les Howell wrote:
> >>On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 18:04 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >>>On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:0
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 01:06:23PM -0700, Les Howell wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 18:04 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:02:27AM -0700, John Chludzinski wrote:
> > > I've had a debate with some co-workers about whether or not a message
> > > that's sent to the loopb
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 08:32:56AM -0700, John Chludzinski wrote:
> Both 127.0.0.7 and 127.0.0.10 exist in /etc/hosts for the client apps to
> use when connecting to the server.The clients use both
> gethostbyname() and getservbyname() for connecting. Currently, there
> are *no* multiple loopb
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 03:55:32PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 29.08.2013 15:53, schrieb Neil Horman:
> > you can use the ip utility to create dummy network devices on top of your
> > loopback device, but the better question is - why? Having multiple clients
>
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 06:34:57AM -0700, John Chludzinski wrote:
> I need to used multiple loopback addresses (interfaces) for an server
> application that communicates with multiple clients running on the same
> machine. Since a loopback interface short circuits the network stack
> (looping back
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 12:05:56PM -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2013-07-15 11:37 (GMT-0400) Neil Horman composed:
>
> >If you really don't want to see ipv6 sockets, you need to use the
> >ipv6.disable
> >kernel command line option.
>
> Maybe the problem i
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 04:55:24PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 15.07.2013 16:44, schrieb Michal Schmidt:
> > On 07/13/2013 01:44 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >> please take a look at this
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982740#c12
> >>
> >> what do we do in the future to d
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 02:09:19PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 12/19/2012 12:30 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> >Hey all-
> > I've got this package I'm trying to get reviewed:
> >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884291
> >
> >Will to swap
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:58:39PM +0100, Mario Blättermann wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 19. Dezember 2012, 14:30:53 schrieb Neil Horman:
> > Hey all-
> > I've got this package I'm trying to get reviewed:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884291
> >
Hey all-
I've got this package I'm trying to get reviewed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884291
Will to swap for it if anyone is interested.
Neil
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 09:37:04AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 09:27:22AM -0400, Ralph Bean wrote:
> >> The Messaging SIG has been working on building a messaging bus for
> >> Fedora Infrastru
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 09:27:22AM -0400, Ralph Bean wrote:
> The Messaging SIG has been working on building a messaging bus for
> Fedora Infrastructure and the main obstacle to testing stuff in our
> staging environment is a boatload of package reviews.
>
> If anyone is up to help, it would be mu
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:24:18PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Is something wrong? I just re-checked the updates I pushed and I did
> push updates of the same EVR to both F15 and F16...
>
> Richard
>
+1, I think something is wrong with the reporting tool. I just got upgrade
broken emails for al
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 05:42:45PM +0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 07:03 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 12:20:20PM +0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2012-04-05 at 07:19 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 a
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 12:20:20PM +0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-04-05 at 07:19 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 05:28:10PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > >
> > > Amerigo, we go and return to same point which I asked Neil before.
> > &g
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 05:28:10PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> On 04/04/2012 06:40 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 13:30:51 +0800, DY (Dave) wrote:
> >
> >> On 04/03/2012 01:22 PM, Dave Young wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 03/31/2012 02:12 AM, Linda Wang wrote:
> >>>
> per Fedora
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:11:17AM -0500, James Laska wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm in the process of updating the existing mediawiki-semantic package.
> The new version of mediawiki-semantic adds a dependency on an unpackaged
> extension: Validator. Anyone interested in a review swap?
>
> https:/
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 03:48:04PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 31.12.2011 14:48, schrieb Neil Horman:
> > Yup, I see the problem. The msi irq sysfs objects that are allocated in
> > populate_msi_sysfs are getting kobject_put in free_msi_irqs, even in the
> >
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 02:02:33AM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> has anybody else noticed this the last time?
>
> i get this permanently in test-guests with F16/F17 while
> the re-labeled 2.6.41 from F15 has no problems
>
> all the loaded modules are from upstream-kernel (vmxnet3, pvscsi...)
> an
Hey all-
I've got this little utility icfg, I'd like to package for fedora:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766932
I'll gladly swap with anyone that wants to review this for me.
Thanks!
Neil
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 07:22:32PM +, Alexander Bahoor wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
>
> Route metric is a variable that a router uses to choose the best route to a
> destination. Depending on the routing protocol, the metric definition is
> different. What I'm trying to understand is how Linux
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 05:46:57PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I'm currently going through and bumping several packages whose Rawhide
> builds have got behind their F16 builds.
>
> I've come across several packages where git merge hit 'conflicts' for no
> readily apparently reason in this case
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 10:24:34PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 29.10.2011 22:04, schrieb Lucas:
> > I do not understand why it places i915, eth0 and snd_hda_intel on the same
> > CPU
> > uname -a = 3.1.0-1.fc16.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Oct 24 12:18:13 UTC 2011 x86_64
> > x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Lin
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 01:24:02PM -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
> In trying to clean up the broken dependencies report, I intend to revive
> three retired packages:
>
> lwp:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745216
>
> rpc2:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745218
>
> rvm:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 11:36:55AM +0300, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
> >
> > If you open a bug on fuse-s3fs with the problem you encountered, I'll
> > gladly fix
> > it.
>
> ok,
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732939
>
Thanks, I'll take care of it today.
Neil
>
> >
> > I've tried the
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:22:42AM -0700, Jorge Gallegos wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:52:42PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 09:33:55AM -0700, Jorge Gallegos wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I opened the pasted review request
ackage is already part of Fedora.
No one ever packaged the google code s3fs, because as you've noted, development
on it is dead.
If you're having trouble getting fuse-s3fs from Fedora to work, open a bug, and
I'll help you get it going.
Neil
> On Aug 23, 2011 4:47 AM, "N
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:12:55AM +0300, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
> is this project still active ?
>
Yes, the project is still active.
> if not then fedora should have rpm for the other s3fs project <
> http://code.google.com/p/s3fs
>
> if so then the following lines in the code should be fixed
Th
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 10:57:54PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> One of the maintainers of systemd and I have been working
> together on trying to convert the NFS SysV init scripts
> into systemd services. Here is the long trail...
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 07:24:24AM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-03-26 at 12:10 +0100, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > On 03/26/2011 12:05 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
> > > Then it became necessary to:
> > >
> > > /etc/init.d/NetworkManager stop
> > >
> > > Then it became necessary to:
> >
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 09:16:09AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> Neil Horman wrote:
> > Anyone interested in swapping reviews? I'de like to get this put to bed:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570166
> > If someone has something they want reviewed, let me
Anyone interested in swapping reviews? I'de like to get this put to bed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570166
If someone has something they want reviewed, let me know.
Thanks!
Neil
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:09:28AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > Bugzilla status for packages violating the Static Library guidelines:
>
> > e2fsprogs 545144
> > xfsprogs556102
>
> These should both be fixed
On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 06:53:31PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote:
> > However, in the meantime I stopped reporting crashes via ABRT because I
> > think it raises the load for a package maintainer to high while the
> > report should go directly to upstream. Bothering
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 01:26:23PM +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> On 01/28/2010 11:52 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 10:21 -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> >
> >>>C'mon do we really need to make this into a fight? The reason why I
> >>
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 03:38:27PM +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> On 01/28/2010 03:25 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> >On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 01:17:08PM +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> >>On 01/28/2010 01:02 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> >>>On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:55:47
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 01:17:08PM +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> On 01/28/2010 01:02 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> >On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:55:47AM +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> >>On 01/28/2010 02:03 AM, Neil Horman wrote:
> >>>On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:46:33
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:55:47AM +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> On 01/28/2010 02:03 AM, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:46:33PM +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> >> Unfortunately it doesn't because of this:
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_b
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:46:33PM +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> Unfortunately it doesn't because of this:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557386
>
> Jirka
>
Bear in mind, Abrt could have fixed this any time in the past few weeks, they've
just chosen not to. Jiri, you and I agreed
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 02:41:57PM +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> On 01/15/2010 01:10 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> >This is the second time in a row, generating backtrace seems to run forever.
> >Something wrong?
> >abrt-1.0.3-1.fc12.x86_64
> >
>
> What is it you're trying to process? If it's some big
84 matches
Mail list logo
