On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 01:31:41PM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> Strange package to include those.
>
> This also looks like an interesting package.
>
> http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/vivid/man1/newuidmap.1.html
Fedora packages the same source package and calls the result
shadow-utils.
Che
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 03:33:43PM -0800, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
> https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47700
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47700/0001-Ticket-47700-Unresolved-external-symbol-references-b.2.patch
> git patch file (master, take2) -- Using ld option "-z defs", cleane
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:05:13AM -0700, Rich Megginson wrote:
> On 11/19/2013 09:44 AM, Nalin Dahyabhai wrote:
> >The language in the ticket description's pretty firm that this isn't
> >going to be changed, and while I can _probably_ work around it on my
> >end
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 06:40:05PM +0100, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le vendredi 08 février 2013 à 11:08 -0500, Nalin Dahyabhai a écrit :
> > This worked for me:
> > openssl cms -verify -noverify -in cacert.p7s
>
> Sorry to not have been clearer, what i want is the clear
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 12:41:29PM +0100, Michael Scherer wrote:
> What triggered to write this mail is review 902503, where I was not able
> to find a way to inspect the cacert.p7s. I am not able to decipher
> openssl man pages to do anything with that file ( as a side note, if
> someone can tell
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:49:59PM -0400, Elio Maldonado wrote:
> The release notes are at
> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/NSS/NSS_3.14_release_notes
Those release notes say that the license is now MPL 2.0.
If I'm reading https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing right, the
License: ta
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 04:12:52PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 11:04:34AM -0400, Nalin Dahyabhai wrote:
> > Whether it does or not, I'm rebuilding the candidate update without this
> > change, since I'd rather not introduce dependency b
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 04:03:08PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 09:00:17AM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-11388/krb5-1.10.2-5.fc1
> >
> > triggers:
> >
> > Error: Package: 1:libguestfs-1.18.5-2.fc17.i686 (updates
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 09:00:17AM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-11388/krb5-1.10.2-5.fc1
>
> triggers:
>
> Error: Package: 1:libguestfs-1.18.5-2.fc17.i686 (updates)
>Requires: /lib/libkrb5.so.3
>Removing: krb5-libs-1.10
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 09:33:31AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> While replacing my koji cert yesterday I was interested in adding a
> passphrase to slow down exploitation if my home desktop got compromised.
> I've look through some of the documentation for maintainers and I haven't
> seen any in
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:41:47AM -0400, James Antill wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 09:19 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On 7/27/11 2:03 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > > In this case, the bad rpm-build broke koji builds, and since Rawhide
> > > may eat babies, it can happen that Rawhide users n
On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 02:15:21PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> glibc now includes libnss_db again, so the nss_db package is no longer
> needed from f16 onward.
Okay, I've updated git, pkgdb, and comps, and filed a ticket with
release engineering to block the builds from the compose.
Thanks,
N
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:09:02PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> It's getting late here, and currently I'm at a loss.
>
> Today's Rawhide build of xulrunner does:
>
> %global nss_version 3.12.9
>
> BuildRequires: nss-devel >= %{nss_version}
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 09:57:43AM +1000, noriko wrote:
> - pam_krb5: http://www.transifex.net/projects/p/pam_krb5/
> - pkinit-nss: http://www.transifex.net/projects/p/pkinit-nss/
Ah, I'd missed the bit in the FAQ about telling transifex to outsource
the translations for these. They should be fix
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 09:41:08AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > I touched it last, and no, you did not. I pulled down the x86_64 builds
> > from yesterday to have a look. RPM didn't complain when I applied them
> > to my system manually, and the krb5-libs package still claims to provide
>
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 02:34:53PM +0100, Jan Safranek wrote:
> On related note, there seems to be something wrong with krb5, I've got
> following notice:
>
> wireshark has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
> On x86_64:
> wireshark-1.4.3-2.fc15.x86_64 requires
> libk5crypto.so.3(k5c
16 matches
Mail list logo