Thanks for your reply. Uploading is no longer an issue.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/c
I am unable to upload to src.fpo.
$ fedpkg new-sources xfce4-dev-tools-4.20.0.tar.bz2
Uploading: xfce4-dev-tools-4.20.0.tar.bz2 to
https://src.fedoraproject.org/repo/pkgs/upload.cgi
Uploading: xfce4-dev-tools-4.20.0.tar.bz2
### 16.4%Network error: (56, 'OpenSSL SSL_read: OpenSSL/3.2.2:
On 7/5/24 15:10, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 7:45 PM Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
I am updating libqalculate to v5.2.0 which bumps the soname version. I
will rebuild the following packages that depend on libqalculate.
plasma-workspace
step
cantor
qalculate-kde
Looks like you
I am updating libqalculate to v5.2.0 which bumps the soname version. I
will rebuild the following packages that depend on libqalculate.
plasma-workspace
step
cantor
qalculate-kde
Thanks,
Mukundan.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject
On 8/13/23 17:17, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
On 8/13/23 16:28, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
I am going to orphan the following packages unless someone wants to
pick them up. I do not have time to maintain them anymore since the
dependencies have become more and more complex with each
release.Several
On 8/13/23 16:28, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
I am going to orphan the following packages unless someone wants to pick
them up. I do not have time to maintain them anymore since the
dependencies have become more and more complex with each release.Several
of these packages do not have dependencies
I am going to orphan the following packages unless someone wants to pick
them up. I do not have time to maintain them anymore since the
dependencies have become more and more complex with each release.Several
of these packages do not have dependencies packaged in Fedora.
spyder (docstring-to-m
On 4/3/23 12:53, Blaise Pabon wrote:
Hi Mukundan, Jonathan,
I have been working on becoming a fedora maintainer and I would love
to help.
When I followed the links to the build logs I got a 404.
Blaise
Hi Blaise,
I will be happy to help you with becoming a packager. I am also happy to
I have been maintaining spyder in Fedora for sometime now. Since the
time I took up maintaining spyder, the dependencies have expanded
considerably (I have packaged several of these dependencies in the
past). Unfortunately, I am not able to devote as much as time as needed
to maintain this pa
> On Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 12:11:40PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> That said, until then I can try and run things on weekends.
Is there a formal process to volunteer to hold the keys to the kingdom?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproje
I am unable to clone repos from src.fpo since this morning.
$ fedpkg co xfce4-power-manager
Cloning into 'xfce4-power-manager'...
nonamed...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org: Permission denied (publickey).
fatal: Could not read from remote repository.
Please make sure you have the correct access rights
a
On 3/21/22 20:35, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
I will be updating libqalculate (and qalculate-gtk) involving soname
bump on rawhide in the coming days.
The following packages will be affected -
cantor
step
plasma-workspace
qalculate-kde
I will rebuild these packages and open bug reports if
I will be updating libqalculate (and qalculate-gtk) involving soname
bump on rawhide in the coming days.
The following packages will be affected -
cantor
step
plasma-workspace
qalculate-kde
I will rebuild these packages and open bug reports if there are issues.
Thanks,
Mukundan.
--
GPG Key
On 8/22/21 10:18 AM, Iago Rubio wrote:
On Sun, 2021-08-22 at 09:00 -0400, Troy Curtis Jr wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 6:25 PM Mukundan Ragavan <
nonamed...@gmail.com> wrote:
I am orphaning rarian (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rarian).
If Mukundan want to take it over agai
On 8/18/21 3:51 PM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
Am Mittwoch, dem 18.08.2021 um 10:45 +0200 schrieb Ondrej Mosnacek:
Hello,
I would like to update quazip to version 1.1 in rawhide (i.e. future
F36) [1][2], but since this update will change sonames (libquazip.so
-> libquazip1-qt4.so and libqu
I am orphaning rarian (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rarian). As
far as I can tell, nothing in Fedora depends on it anymore.
# dnf repoquery --releasever rawhide --whatrequires librarian\*
Last metadata expiration check: 0:02:50 ago on Wed 11 Aug 2021 06:03:30
PM EDT.
rarian-compat-0:0.
libqalculate 3.20.1 updates soname version to 22. I will rebuild the
affected packages.
$ dnf repoquery --releasever=rawhide --whatrequires libqalculate
cantor-libs-0:21.04.2-2.fc35.x86_64
plasma-workspace-libs-0:5.22.4-1.fc35.x86_64
qalculate-kde-0:0.9.7.10-31.nmu1.fc35.x86_64
step-0:21.04
I am orphaning the following packages. They should not be needed for
anything else in Fedora (acc. to dnf repoquery --whatprovides).
python-jsonrpcserver (there is another package of similar name that is
needed by spyder)
All these are required by the package above.
python-aiozmq
python-fl
On 2/22/21 9:33 PM, Jerry James wrote:
The compiler is telling you that it saw "#include " inside an
extern "C" block, but that glib.h ultimately pulls in headers with C++
definitions. It looks like the glib headers already take care of
defining things correctly depending on whether they are
Hi,
I am trying to update nextcloud-client to 3.1.3. Build keeps failing
with this -
/builddir/build/BUILD/desktop-3.1.3/src/gui/cloudproviders/cloudprovidermanager.cpp:15:1:
note: 'extern "C"' linkage started here
15 | extern "C" {
Can someone please explain how I can fix this failure
On 6/23/20 12:26 PM, Tomas Hrnciar wrote:
>
> We would like to kindly ask you to add explicit
> BuildRequires for python3-setuptools to packages where setuptools is used.
> nonamedotc python-nmrglue python-rope spyder
I have added buildrequires on setuptools for these three packages.
On 5/26/20 1:49 PM, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
> Mukundan, your package misses.
> Please, rebuild `gtkhash` against `libb2-0.98.1` or let me commit
> changes to it.
>
Hi Antonio,
This is done. Please add gtkhash to your update as well.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45107
Scratch build of gtkhash does not appear to pull in libb2-0.98.1. Has
the buildroot override expired?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45077601
On 5/26/20 1:49 PM, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
> Mukundan, your package misses.
> Please, rebuild `gtkhash` against `libb2-0.98.1` or
libqalculate soname bump is happening with v3.8.0.
The following packages are affected -
- qalculate-gtk
- plasma-workspace
- step
- cantor
I will rebuild all these packages on rawhide.
qalculate-kde will also affected but this is already FTBFS. So, I won't
touch this.
Mukundan.
signature.a
Hi all,
I have two packages that fail to build from source. As far as I can tell
from the build logs, they are gcc-10 failures. The typical "extern"
solution does not work me (or, I am not adding 'extern' at the correct
places).
Can someone give me pointers for fixing this FTBFS? Here are the lin
libqalculate soname bump is happening with v3.6.0.
The following packages are affected -
plasma-workspace
step
cantor
qalculate-kde
I will rebuild all the packages on rawhide.
Mukundan.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel
Can someone review this package for me? This should be fairly
straightforward.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752298
Thanks,
Mukundan.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproj
libqalculate soname bump is happening with v3.3 (libqalculate.so.21.2.0).
The following packages are affected -
plasma-workspace
step
cantor
qalculate-kde
I will rebuild the packages on both rawhide and F31 tomorrow.
Maintainers, if you do not want me to touch F31, please let me know.
Mukundan.
Can someone from releng re-tag these packages and push them to stable?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1344119
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1344089
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1344114
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/build
On 5/19/19 1:58 PM, Andrew Toskin wrote:
>> I'm already a packager, and I'd be willing to take over BleachBit. This way
>> you
>> don't have to wait for Silvia to learn the ropes before handing off control.
> Oops, I'm used to having my email client do the signature for me, but I
> responded he
On 5/19/19 5:05 AM, Silvia Sánchez wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Yes, I know Python 2 will be soon removed, but I can't just let
> Bleachbit die. It's too useful for that.
> Finding a sponsor seems to be the hard bit. I've been looking for one
> for ages.
> Thanks for the answer.
>
> Kind regards,
> Si
I intend to orphan bleachbit soon. If anyone is interested please let me
know and I will transfer the package.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/bleachbit
Mukundan.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel
libqalculate soname bump is happening with update to v3.1. The following
packages are affected -
plasma-workspace
step
cantor
qalculate-kde
I will rebuild these in the coming days.Note that qalculate-kde is FTBFS
right now.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_
libqalculate soname bump is happening with v3.0 (libqalculate.so.21).
The following packages are affected -
plasma-workspace
step
cantor
qalculate-kde
I will rebuild these packages and file bug reports if needed. I did not
build v2.9.x despite my earlier email.
Are there objections if I do this
libqalculate soname bump is happening with v2.9. The following
packages are affected -
plasma-workspace
step
cantor
qalculate-kde
I will rebuild these packages and file bug reports if needed.
Mukundan.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
libqalculate soname bump is happening with v2.8.2. The following
packages are affected -
plasma-workspace
step
cantor
qalculate-kde
I will rebuild these packages and file bug reports if needed.
Mukundan.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 10/24/18 1:49 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 24.10.2018 01:47, Mukundan Ragavan wrote> I think I can just drop
> python2 version of spyder. Thank you for letting
>> me know.
>
> That would be awesome, it would also unblock:
>
> python-spyder-kernels
> python-clou
On 10/23/18 8:59 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just orphaned python2-astroid and python2-pylint.
>
> I don't need them and I don't want to maintain legacy python2 packages.
>
> Those are needed for python2-spyder, python2-asttokens,
> python2-flake8-import-order. Please consider remov
On 9/23/18 4:46 AM, Christian Dersch wrote:
> On 9/23/18 2:23 AM, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
>> I intent to orphan LabPlot soon. If anyone is interested, I can transfer
>> this package to that person.
>>
>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/LabPlot
> Hi,
>
> I&
I intent to orphan LabPlot soon. If anyone is interested, I can transfer
this package to that person.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/LabPlot
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject
On 9/9/18 4:27 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 09/09/2018 06:56 AM, Leigh Scott wrote:
>> I don't use or have the time to maintain blueberry and bluez-tools so I have
>> orphaned them.
> Since the Xfce spin uses these, I'll take em. Co-maintainers welcome.
>
> kevin
I would like to co-maintain. Can y
libqalculate soname bump is happening with v2.6.2. The following
packages are affected -
plasma-workspace
step
cantor
qalculate-kde
I will rebuild these packages for rawhide and F29 before Sunday.
Mukundan.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Can someone please review this package for me? This should be relatively
straightforward.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599026
I need this to update python IDE spyder to version 3.3.0. I can review a
package in return.
Thanks,
Mukundan.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digi
libqalculate soname bump is happening with v2.6.0. The following
packages are affected -
plasma-workspace
step
cantor
qalculate-kde
I will rebuild these packages.
Mukundan.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list
libqalculate soname bump is happening with v2.5.0. The following
packages are affected -
plasma-workspace
step
cantor
qalculate-kde
I will rebuild these packages.
Mukundan.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list
On 05/06/2018 07:31 AM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 6:54 PM Mukundan Ragavan
> wrote:
>> fityk (depends on cmpfit)
>> cmpfit (fityk is dependent on this)
> Unless someone else wants these two, I will take them. Co-maintainers more
> than welcom
I am orphaning certain packages and retiring some others that are no
longer needed.
Packages being **orphaned**
fityk (depends on cmpfit)
cmpfit (fityk is dependent on this)
rarian
csmith
python-cclib
Unfortunately, I fell behind in maintaining these packages (particularly
csmith and cclib). The
Since 2.4.0 is out, soname change will be to libqalculate.so.16. I will submit
pull requests for the affected packages. I might miss F28.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproj
I will be updating libqalculate to the latest upstream release (v2.3.0 instead
of 2.2.1 as per my previous email). This involves a soname change.
The following packages are affected -
plasma-workspace
step
cantor
qalculate-kde
I will build qalculate and the affected packages in rawhide and Fe
> On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 20:46 -0500, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
>
> Thanks for the notification.
>
> Note F28 is currently in freeze for Beta; this is a long freeze, and
> honestly, might get longer, given the current state of things. So I'm
> not sure whether it'd be
I will be updating libqalculate to the latest upstream release (v2.2.1).
This involves a soname change. The following packages are affected.
plasma-workspace
step
cantor
qalculate-kde
I have built all these packages for rawhide and F28 in a COPR [0]. Since
we have the same versions on both rawhi
I am planning to orphan the four packages (list below) in a few days. If
anyone is interested in maintaining these packages, I can make you the
person admin instead of orphaning.
These are the packages -
autodocksuite
gaussum
qmforge
webcpp
These packages have very little to no development upstr
I noticed in comps that the group "hardware support" is set to false under
tag. This group is also not shown as "add ons" for minimal
installation in anaconda.
Why is the group hidden? Can we show "hardware support" group in Anaconda
(non-live installers, of course)? Installing this group is
libqalculate-2..0.0 is now built on rawhide.
I have submitted pull requests for cantor, qalculate-kde and plasma-workspace
to rebuild for the soname bump. I have not touched step (I could not get it to
build in mock so I did not touch the package).
The COPR is now deleted.
I will be updating libqalculate and qalculate-gtk for rawhide on
Tuesday. This will involve libqalculate soname bump.
The following packages will be affected -
cantor
step
plasma-workspace
qalculate-kde
I have setup COPR for building against the update library [1]. Packages
other than step build
I am building spyder 3.1.3 on *rawhide* right now. We do not have py3
version of rope yet and jedi is one version too recent in rawhide at the
moment. But, this should be fixed with 3.1.4 (when upstream releases it).
please test this version of spyder. I am looking at pushing this to F26
absent t
On 04/02/2017 05:46 PM, Cătălin George Feștilă wrote:
> the problem with build from source under Fedora distro of the last
> Spyder IDE
>
> https://github.com/spyder-ide/spyder/issues/4318
>
Yes. Some of spyder dependencies were recently built and I was away. I
will update to 3.x this week.
--
On 02/07/2017 03:30 AM, andr...@benzlerweb.de wrote:
> Hello Guys,
>
> bluetooth is broken. I installed all xfce4 package and xfe-bluetooth did not
> installed (dependency).
The package can be straight forward compiled from fedora.
>
> http://centos.cms4all.org/repo/7/other/SRPMS/xfce-blueto
On 01/29/2017 12:37 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Hello team,
>
> I applied a patch sent by upstream but some odd reason, the build kept
> on failing
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17472254
>
> I include the patch for preview so someone can see what went wrong.
>
> T
I recently update libqalculate to latest upstream version 0.9.10.
Unfortunately, I forgot to send out a soname bump email (I emailed one
affected package maintainer though) - which I realized only when I saw
the broken dependency emails.
The list of affected packages are
1/ step
2/ qalculate-kde
On 09/30/2016 06:52 AM, Björn Esser wrote:
> Hello,
>
> there is another small python-package from me that needs review [1].
> Any offers?
>
> Cheers
> Björn
>
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380671
Taken.
--
GPG Key - E5C8BC67
---
signature.asc
Description
On 09/24/2016 06:30 PM, gil wrote:
> hi
>
> Il 25/09/2016 00:00, Mukundan Ragavan ha scritto:
>> 1/ python-qtconsole
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379090
> take!
> have time for this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366845 ?
> thanks in
Hi folks,
Spyder 3 was released recently and several runtime dependencies are not
present in Fedora repositories (as far as I can tell).
I have review requests that will address these runtime dependencies
(below). Please take up the packages for review. I am, of course,
willing to swap reviews.
4.12 packages on EL-7
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 17:57:17 -0400
From: Mukundan Ragavan
To: EPEL Development List , Fedora
Xfce users and developers ,
centos-de...@centos.org
I had written earlier [0] about the availability of Xfce 4.12 packages
in EPEL testing repositories. This is a reminder for
On 05/02/2016 08:44 PM, Michael Cullen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've just submitted a review request here
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332344
>
> I'm a software developer from the UK currently living and working in
> London on Linux-based set top box middleware. I've been a Linux user f
All,
I have submitted a package review request for xfce4-calculator-plugin.
It should be a fairly straightforward review.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326151
I am, of course, open for a review swap.
Thanks,
Mukundan.
--
GPG Key - E5C8BC67
---
signature.asc
Descr
On 04/03/2016 10:03 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 08:46:12PM -0400, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA512
>>
>>
>> I would be glad to put this up for review and maintain the package
>>
On 03/29/2016 11:13 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 27 March 2016 at 05:55, gil wrote:
>> can you take this for me https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316195
>
> If you're not getting many replies it's because gmail is auto-marking
> all your emails as spam: "Why is this message in Spam?
SuperLU license is changed from BSD to BSD and GPLv2+.
Some files in the package are licensed under GPLv2+.
Mukundan.
--
GPG Key - E5C8BC67
---
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/adm
On 03/27/2016 12:55 AM, gil wrote:
> hi
> can you take this for me
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316195 ?
> thanks in advance
> .g
>
Taken.
Thanks.
Mukundan.
--
GPG Key - E5C8BC67
---
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@li
Hello all,
I have a compat package that I would like to get reviewed.
Here is the link to the review -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321440
This is a compat package for SuperLU which I updated to v5.1 today. Some
of the packages that depend on SuperLU has version specific requ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello all,
I will be updating SuperLU to the latest upstream release - version
5.1.1. This results in the libsuperlu soname version to be bumped from
4.3 to 5.1. There are only two packages that depend on superlu -
armadillo and freefem++.
I will
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/29/2016 05:25 PM, Amit Saha wrote:
>> SG> Hello, I like to have everything on my system in a package.
>> So, I SG> looked around and found no recipe or rpm for Rstudio.
>>
>> I actually just use the upstream RPMs, but I unpack and repack
>> th
Hello all,
I have submitted two packages for review. I trust both these reviews are
fairly straightforward.
1/ python-nmrglue
This is a python module for processing nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)
data.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315020
2/ xfpanel-switch
This is a simple
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/16/2016 11:23 PM, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote:
>> (abs(point.x()-position.point.x())>20 &&
>> qAbs(point.y()-position.point.y())>20 ) {
>>
>> There is mention about this in gcc 6 porting "guide" -
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-6/porting_to.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi folks,
After the recent mass builds, I have a few packages that fail to build
from source. I have tried digging through the build logs to see if I
can fix them. Unfortunately, my knowledge of C/C++ is far too basic to
handle these issues.
If f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/08/2016 11:14 AM, Mattias Ellert wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have 4 R package that I submitted for review.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305333 R-highlight
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334 R-inline
> https://b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 01/12/2016 03:38 PM, Martin Ueding wrote:
> I was rather surprised by this too. When the UI changed I was
> already a bit sceptical as KeePassX has not changed in like five
> years. When it did not open the old database I knew that I was
> served
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/07/2015 04:05 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Per this fesco ticket:
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1484#comment:3
>
> I have orphaned all of the packages that had chitlesh as a point
> of contact:
>
> LabPlot -- Data Analysis and Visua
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/01/2015 03:17 AM, Radek Novacek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "Spyder is the Scientific PYthon Development EnviRonment"
>
> I no longer use Spyder, so I'm looking for someone who wants to
> take it over. Please, ask for ACLs for it if you would like to
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 09/30/2015 03:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> htop (epel7) htop (f21) htop (f22) htop (f23) htop (master)
Taken htop.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWDFqsAAoJEHE/1K3lyLxnCwoP/0BPh1OAekkWfY7JV975goJb
sMDvgV+UoAGxnveITX
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/29/2015 12:09 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Mukundan,
> can you please decide whether you want to:
>
> i) patch out the #error and keep building against wxGTK 3 against
> upstream's advice ii) revert to building against wxGTK 2
>
> and then mak
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/20/2015 08:36 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> And the conclusion? You should expect less delay. Not being blocked
> by other users. And I can finally say, what I wanted to say for
> long time: Please use Copr more! You can even set up builds in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/29/2015 05:55 PM, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
>
> * bionetgen fails to build from source
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9361549
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206950
>
False alarm. T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Greetings,
I have updated the package sundials to the latest upstream version
(2.6.0) on rawhide (only) today.
repoquery indicates bionetgen (zbyszek) and ascend (sagitter) depend
on sundials.
$ repoquery --whatrequires sundials
ascend-libs-0:0.9
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi all,
Could someone please review a package I submitted today?
xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin -->
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197520
I would, of course, be willing to do a review in exchange.
Thanks,
Mukundan.
- --
GPG key: 00E8658
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 01/02/2015 01:10 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi,
>
> python-pillow split off the sane library into a separate project,
> review request for the package is here:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178191
>
> Happy to review in exchang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 12/11/2014 08:04 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some packages needing review. All pretty simple cmake/qmake stuff:
>
> - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173373 - qtspell -
> Spell checking for Qt text widgets [*] -
> https://bugzi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 11/24/2014 03:49 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 10:12:46PM +0100, Zbigniew
> Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> I have working packages [1] for genesis and moose (both neuron
>> simulators). I didn't submit them because
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 11/09/2014 11:15 PM, Jens Petersen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently llvm was bumped to 3.5 in Rawhide. This breaks ghc on
> armv7 so I created a review request for llvm34 for ghc to use for
> its llvm backend.
>
> Can someone please help review the pac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/12/2014 12:12 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Oct 2014 15:41:32 -0500 Mukundan Ragavan
> wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512
>>
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I would like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi All,
I am trying to update Texmaker from version 4.2 to 4.3 and I have run
into a problem I am unable to solve. Here it is -
The source tarball has a directory hunspell which is removed in %prep
and system hunspell libraries are used instead. T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I think having a "trivial patch" policy and proven packager route of
implementation is a great idea!
On 06/26/2014 11:42 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> provenpackagers who would be willing to query for and apply these?
>
> Another idea that leaps to min
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 06/11/2014 07:07 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For the ongoing effort to package salome/code-aster, I need these
> two dependencies:
>
> - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108395 -
> netgen-mesher - Somewhat complexish, autotools,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
All,
I have orphaned clementine. Please feel free to take over.
Best,
Mukundan.
- --
GPG key-ID: 00E8658D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTjyEVAAoJEIfjPv0A6GWNvx0P/3Nq0UMcJcLH
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/19/2014 09:34 AM, Laurent Rineau wrote:
> Le Monday 19 May 2014 09:01:25 nonamedotc a écrit :
>> I can take ipe. I have used it on and off...
>
> Please take the ownership.
>
> What I found difficult with Ipe is that the Otfried Cheong has no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/15/2014 11:06 AM, Henrique Junior wrote:
> Hi, I was taking a look at Fedora Package DB and saw that some very
> important computational chemistry softwares (ghemical, mopac,
> mpqcare... ) marked as orphaned in F20, is that correct? As a
> c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/09/2014 12:11 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I've orphaned the webcpp package, interested parties are welcome to
> take it.
>
> The previous owner had passed away. :(
>
> See: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1267
>
> Thanks,
>
> kevin
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Bonus mailing list questions!
>
> Is it helpful to post this here? If so, is full text important, or
> is posting a link to the web site fine? Would it be helpful to
> post it to other lists as well or instead? What about repurposing
> the defun
Hi All,
I have submitted a package for a bioinformatics tool - autodocksuite for
review.
Can someone please review the package for inclusion in Fedora?
Here is the review request -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067041
Thanks.
Regards,
Mukundan.
--
devel mailing list
devel@l
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo