Re: Inactive packagers removed from the packager group

.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > -- > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code

Re: Konflux: What is the right time?

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://

Re: Gating failure: Guest couldn't be provisioned: Artemis resource ended in 'error' state

__ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedor

[PROPOSAL] Enable nosync for the installability test in CI

, in case of concerns. Thanks and Best Regards, /M -- 🧑‍🔧 Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / Linux QE 🎩 Red Hat Slack :: mvadkert :: #testing-farm #tmt 📱 Fedora Matrix :: mvadkert :: #Fedora CI 🌍️ Remote Czech Republic :: Red Hat Czech s.r.o

Fedora CI testing affected by systemd/selinux issues

, possible also some functional tests might be affected: https://pagure.io/fedora-ci/general/issue/447 Best regards, /M -- 🧑‍🔧 Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / Linux QE 🎩 Red Hat Slack :: mvadkert :: #testing-farm #tmt 📱 Fedora Matrix :: mvadkert :: #Fedora CI 🌍️ Remote

Re: [status] Fedora CI / 2023-11-03

Forgot to CC devel list for a larger audience ... On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 4:16 PM Miroslav Vadkerti wrote: > Hi all, > > Fedora CI is very well alive! We will be sending out bi-weekly updates > like this one about some of our plans, interesting information and status > updates.

Re: Fedora-Rawhide testing blocked in Testing Farm (partially)

Rawhide testing with Zuul was disabled until the issue is fixed. Please use, the testing results from Fedora CI PR testing until it the dnf5 issues are resolved. Best regards, /M On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 11:45 PM Miroslav Vadkerti wrote: > To mitigate errors, I am proposing to disa

Re: Fedora-Rawhide testing blocked in Testing Farm (partially)

To mitigate errors, I am proposing to disable Rawhide testing via Zull in dist-git PRs: https://pagure.io/fedora-zuul-jobs-config/pull-request/180 /M On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 11:19 PM Miroslav Vadkerti wrote: > Hi, > > A small update, Zuul testing is still blocked, please use th

Re: Fedora-Rawhide testing blocked in Testing Farm (partially)

regards, /M On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 11:16 AM Miroslav Vadkerti wrote: > Hi, > > a few more issues appeared: > > 1. Testing PRs via Zuul is broken due to missing feature in dnf5 >https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf5/issues/549 > >No ETA for fixing thi

Fedora-Rawhide testing blocked in Testing Farm (partially)

lugin. ETA 30 min. Best regards, /M< On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 7:39 PM Miroslav Vadkerti wrote: > Both issues were hot patched, and testing against Rawhide is unblocked > again \o/ > > Thanks to all who helped! > > /M > > On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 2:51 PM Miroslav Vadkerti

Re: Fedora-Rawhide testing blocked in Testing Farm

Both issues were hot patched, and testing against Rawhide is unblocked again \o/ Thanks to all who helped! /M On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 2:51 PM Miroslav Vadkerti wrote: > Hi, > > Fedora Rawhide testing blocked on dnf5 update, which broke Testing Farm. > > We are trying to hotpat

Fedora-Rawhide testing blocked in Testing Farm

Hi, Fedora Rawhide testing blocked on dnf5 update, which broke Testing Farm. We are trying to hotpatch the problems to bring back testing against Rawhide. ETA 2 hours. For updates watch: https://status.testing-farm.io/issues/2023-06-21-rawhide-outage/ Best regards, /M -- Miroslav Vadkerti

Re: Help understanding Fedora CI failure wrt RPM Sequoia

: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > -- Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senio

Support for excluding packages enabled in Fedora CI and RHEL 9 CI

/Quick+Start+Guide [3] https://tmt.readthedocs.io/en/stable/spec/plans.html#install -- Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / BaseOS QE / OSCI IRC mvadkert #tft #baseosci #osci :: GPG 0x7B5B2E95 TPB-C 2C215 :: Mobile +420 773 944 252 Red Hat Czech s.r.o, Purkyňova 115, 612 00

Re: Fedora Zuul had been integrated with Testing Farm and TMT

FTR verified, when TMT is not around, it is now skipped: https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/status/change/189,a906cee4eafd4a13c699b8964a1a69f6acdd03c9 On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 1:04 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 22. 07. 21 1:02, Miroslav Vadkerti wrote: > > Hi Miro, > >

Re: Fedora Zuul had been integrated with Testing Farm and TMT

Hrončok wrote: > On 21. 07. 21 15:04, Miroslav Vadkerti wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > Today we are gladly announcing that the Zuul CI system for Fedora, which > is > > running checks for pull requests against src.fedoraproject.org > > <http://src.fedoraproject.o

Fedora Zuul had been integrated with Testing Farm and TMT

-- Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm IRC mvadkert #fedora-ci ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https

Re: Update gating test is "failed" with no useful information

> Hi Richard, > > > This is https://pagure.io/fedora-ci/general/issue/161, only know workaround > is to rerun > the test (by logging in to the Jenkins instance and hitting the Rebuild > button). Not yet > sure why this is happening, I will try to concentrate on it in next weeks, it > is quite

Re: Update gating test is "failed" with no useful information

Hi Richard, > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-667db9b546 > > Some tests have failed, but as usual there seems to be no easy way to > work out why. For example the hivex test has this useless console > output: > > > https://osci-jenkins-1.ci.fedoraproject.org/job/fedora-ci/

Re: ELN build order

Actually that would not help in this situation, I was talking about Fedora, ELN builds are not planned to be gated .. I stand corrected, thanks @Michal Srb /M On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 9:42 AM Miroslav Vadkerti wrote: > Hi, > > can we share the timeline for making rpmdeplint and insta

Re: ELN build order

oject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / BaseOS QE / OSCI IRC mvadkert #tft #baseosci #osci :: GPG 0x7B5B2E95 TPB-C 2C215 :: Mobi

Re: Running a test from dist-git

Hi, sorry for the late response :( On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 9:42 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 11:26:59AM +0200, Miroslav Vadkerti wrote: > > For this time I rescheduled the run: > > > > > > > https://jenkins-continuous-infra.apps.ci.centos.

Re: Running a test from dist-git

ttp://libguestfs.org > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https:

Re: Fwd: Use suid_dumpable=2 for development releases

> The issue described in the article was fixed by requiring an absolute > path in core_pattern (If I understand it correctly). > > If core_pattern is unsafe, the process is not dumped at all (man 5 proc). > > The kernel commit adds a warning, because kernel was silently ignoring > crashes and no