Hi,
Instruction [1] about building upstream kernel should be updated,
because since commit 5e6abd7f4dce [2] the Fedora kernel config contain
CONFIG_SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYS="certs/rhel.pem" and this is lead to build
error:
HOSTCC
/home/mikhail/packaging-work/git/linux/tools/bpf/reso
I think that getting the f41 package with fedora-40 config looks at
least odd. And one of the solutions is making rolling config pointed
to branch config rather than the other way around.
--
Best Regards,
Mike Gavrilov.
--
___
devel mailing list -- deve
Why branched config pointed to rolling config?
# ls -ln | grep fedora-40
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 0 135 26 Jan 11 20:46 fedora-40-aarch64.cfg ->
fedora-rawhide-aarch64.cfg
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 0 135 23 Jan 11 20:46 fedora-40-i386.cfg ->
fedora-rawhide-i386.cfg
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 0 135 26 Jan 11 20:46 fedora-40-pp
Why branched config pointed to rolling config?
# ls -ln | grep fedora-40
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 0 135 26 Jan 11 20:46 fedora-40-aarch64.cfg ->
fedora-rawhide-aarch64.cfg
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 0 135 23 Jan 11 20:46 fedora-40-i386.cfg ->
fedora-rawhide-i386.cfg
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 0 135 26 Jan 11 20:46 fedora-40-p
Thanks, you saved the day
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: h
Today %{?dist} in spec file started unfolding to
fc40{?with_bootstrap:~bootstrap} when I builded mesa locally in the mock
container.
Yesterday %{?dist} unfolded to fc40 and it expected behavior.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
T
https://mirror.linux-ia64.org/
On Saturday, June 24, 2023 at 12:11:59 PM GMT+5, Samuel Sieb
wrote:
On 6/23/23 22:50, Mikhail Gorsky via devel wrote:
> Hello! Please pay attention that ISO for x86_64 from
> https://fedoraproject.org/workstation/download/
> <https://fedor
Hello! Please pay attention that ISO for x86_64 from
https://fedoraproject.org/workstation/download/ is not available. ___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code
Thanks, for answer. I build every day rpm packages from git locally with mock.
And every build erases the contents of the `/var/lib/mock`. I did not save
build log and I suppose that the rpm package itself does not contain
information about what versions of packages was used for build.
Briefly
Is it possible to find out which packages were used when building the package
if the build logs are no longer there, and there are only two builded packages
on hand (yesterday and today).
This is necessary in order to understand why a package built from the same
commit works differently.
___
> On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 at 15:32, Mikhail Gavrilov
>
> check that you don't have any `.rpmsave` files in /etc/mock.
>
Thanks, the problem was here.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 19:32:01 -0000, Mikhail Gavrilov wrote:
>
> The new distribution-gpg-keys update should fix this. It only went
> stable yesterday so may not have reached the mirrors yet. You can grab
> it from bodhi:
>
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/update
Now compilation failing with error: "Error: GPG check FAILED".
https://pastebin.com/HNGz7N8A
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.
After branching F36, under Rawhide I can not build packages for F35 for i386
arch, instead of it mock builded packages for F36.
Mock rebuild output: https://pastebin.com/LmQxFBUN
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
Hi folks!
Is the chromium debuginfo package exists?
Quick searching in repos didn't find any debuginfo packages for chromium.
# dnf search chromium | grep debuginfo
Last metadata expiration check: 0:08:12 ago on Mon 26 Jul 2021 02:25:19 AM +05.
chromium-bsu-debuginfo.x86_64 : Debug information for
On Mon, 17 May 2021 at 01:30, Mikhail Gavrilov
wrote:
> Once again tried rebuilt rpm-build and updated the local metadata and it
> worked.
> I was just confused that even though there is a mention of the
> rpm-build package in the root.log on line 218 [1]
> But nowhere is it wri
On Sun, 16 May 2021 at 18:51, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> On Sun, 16 May 2021 13:11:09 -, Mikhail Gavrilov wrote:
>
> > I am already added my local repository to
> > `/etc/mock/templates/fedora-rawhide.tpl` with locally builded rpm-build
> > package.
>
> D
Hi folks.
Can anyone tell me how to replace the rpm-build package with my own in a mock
container.
I am already added my local repository to
`/etc/mock/templates/fedora-rawhide.tpl` with locally builded rpm-build
package.
[local-repo]
name=local repo
baseurl=file:///home/mikhail/rpmbuild/RPMS
Where is hosted rpm-build package?
$ fedpkg clone -a rpm-build
Cloning into 'rpm-build'...
fatal: repository 'https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rpm-build.git/' not found
Could not execute clone: Failed to execute command.
I want to debug `brp-strip` macro, but for replace this macros in the moc
Has anyone encountered a build problem /usr/bin/strip:
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/here-is-full-path-to-file.so: file truncated ?
I have this problem regularly when I building mesa from git for the i686
architecture.
And the same spec file is successfully builded for the x86_64 architecture.
What's
From here https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1863041#c46 I have
expected what newly-created connection would work properly without manually
changing ipv4.dns-search to ~. on the specific VPN connection.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fed
# authselect apply-changes
[error] [/etc/authselect/nsswitch.conf] has unexpected content!
[error] Unexpected changes to the configuration were detected.
[error] Refusing to activate profile unless those changes are removed or
overwrite is requested.
Some unexpected changes to the configuration we
# authselect apply-changes
[error] [/etc/authselect/nsswitch.conf] has unexpected content!
[error] Unexpected changes to the configuration were detected.
[error] Refusing to activate profile unless those changes are removed
or overwrite is requested.
Some unexpected changes to the configuration wer
I found that here blame patch 201 efi-lockdown.patch.
I was build kernel with fedpkg without this patch and problem was gone.
# cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/amdgpu_gca_config | xxd -e -
: 0003 0004 0004 0010
0010: 0001 0004 0010 0100 .
I builded vanila kernel by this instruction:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Building_a_custom_kernel
On vanila kernel I am able access to files which are restricted on Fedora
kernel.
So I think some Fedora patch is culprit here.
Is anyone here who has these patches added?
# cat /sys/kernel/deb
> I have no idea. My firmware has SecureBoot: enabled/disabled.
>
> journalctl -k -b 0 | grep secureboot
>
> will show you what Linux kernel detected.
>
$ journalctl -k -b 0 | grep secureboot
Dec 28 14:18:45 localhost.localdomain kernel: secureboot: Secure boot disabled
Oh, it looks like Secur
> Do you have SecureBoot enabled?
I use "Other OS" setting. This is considered as disabling SecureBoot?
If No I don't having another option in setup for completely disabling
SecureBoot.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscri
> No answer, just some further things to look at or try. I can use xxd -e
> on files in that directory without problem, though I don't have the
> file you are looking for since I use radeon.
> On my system everything in there is 444 permissions, except directories.
> What does your system show for
> No answer, just some further things to look at or try. I can use xxd -e
> on files in that directory without problem, though I don't have the
> file you are looking for since I use radeon.
> On my system everything in there is 444 permissions, except directories.
> What does your system show for
Hi folks.
Why I cannot read content of some debugfs files which are should be readable.
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/2018-December/029918.html
[mikhail@localhost ~]$ sudo bash
[sudo] password for mikhail:
[root@localhost mikhail]# cd /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0
[root@localhost 0
files present
in the configured directory as CA certificates, using OpenSSL
functions to parse the formats.
It supports concatenated certificate bundles at least in PEM format; I
verified that it works with the bundle file in
/etc/pki/ca-trust/extracted/openssl. So I think t
A question arose about a good choice of the default directory for
trusted CA certificates over these proposed rpm PRs:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/strongswan/pull-request/6
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/strongswan/pull-request/7
An IKEv2 client from strongSwan package, charon-nm, need
Very sad changes, because some of my hardware (eee pc 900, and old p4) have to
be dumped.
For the rest of hardware it means more lags and slowness because even on modern
computers such as Intel compute stick only has 2Gb RAM, and this RAM couldn't
be extended. It means Linux will more aggressive
If i do "fedpkg import my-srpm.src.rpm"
i've got:
Uploading: 8f133420a821ce7dde80ea9ec48cd20d my-package.tar.gz
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/fedpkg", line 959, in
args.command(args)
File "/usr/bin/fedpkg", line 467, in import_srpm
mymodule.upload(uploadfiles, re
34 matches
Mail list logo
