On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> But one of the main points of this subthread is that that waiting period is
> way too long for some urgent fixes (security fixes, regression fixes etc.).
>
If it's really a regression, then you will have interested users who
will test from up
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 09:57:40AM +0100, Henrik Nordström wrote:
>> sön 2010-11-21 klockan 11:00 +0100 skrev Till Maas:
>>
>> > I guess this can be somehow automated. E.g. change Bodhi to drop the
>> > karma requirements for packages that had e.
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Michal Hlavinka wrote:
>> this could help, but it's not always possible to add these test cases. One
>> example: imap server package - new bug that can corrupt mail folders in
>> some circumstances. Maintainer updates package and sets 'type=bu
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>> How do you expect to be able to maintain an entire desktop environment
>> on a distribution you don't even have installed? I have some sympathy
>> for the 'fifty people said it works on F14, it probably works on F12
>
Nov 17 17:58:28 mail1 postfix/smtpd[29706]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
bastion02.fedoraproject.org[209.132.181.3]: 450 4.7.1 Service
unavailable; Client host [209.132.181.3] blocked using
dnsbl.sorbs.net; Currently Sending Spam See:
http://www.sorbs.net/lookup.shtml?209.132.181.3;
from= to=
proto=E
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> * F12 critical path/update testing issues. (does it matter this close to
>> EOL?)
>
> Now Fedora n-1 is F13 and we're already seeing the same sort of issues there
> (e.g. the KDE 4.5.3 (non-critpath) bugfix update has ka
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Alberto Bertogli
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 12:48:20PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
>> File a glibc bug.
>
> Upstream or in Fedora's bugzilla? (or both?)
>
Upstream and link to upstream bug in fedora bug tracker.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproje
2010/9/14 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" :
> On 09/15/2010 12:01 AM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:56 PM, James Laska wrote:
>>> Much like we introduced and communicated btrfs support in F-11, should
>>> we communicate systemd as a technology preview in Fedora 14?
>> I would agree wit
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 01.06.10 01:56, Mike Fedyk (mfe...@mikefedyk.com) wrote:
>
>> > KillMode=control-group → the entire cgroup is shot down
>> > KillMode=process-group → only the process group of the process we f
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Wed, 26.05.10 09:01, Jeff Spaleta (jspal...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 5:55 AM, Lennart Poettering
>> wrote:
>> > Well, that depends on configuration.
>>
>> > In systemd you can choose individually for each uni
10 matches
Mail list logo
