On Wed, 6 Jun 2018, at 2:38 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> El mar, 05-06-2018 a las 15:59 -0400, Adam Jackson escribió:
> > On Tue, 2018-06-05 at 13:20 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> >
> > > as part of this change I suspect we would need to make kernel
> > > changes
> > > to stop building a i686 ke
If it genuinely is unmaintained (and this thread doesn’t wake up the
current maintainer - you might want to try a direct email) then you
might be the best person to help maintain it since you’re maintaining
something (the only thing?) that uses it
Michael
On Mon, 7 May 2018, at 10:31 PM, Marcin D
Has anyone else notices this sort of thing?
Skipping the scratch build because an SRPM could not be built:
['rpmbuild','-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs',
u'/var/tmp/thn-gkVzfc/python-twilio.spec'] returned 1: error: line 27:
Dependency tokens must begin with alpha-numeric, '_' or '/
> because I can no longer cherry-pick between branches.
Not true at all - you’d be surprised how well git deals with cherry
picks across diverse branches. And even when it doesn’t there’s very
rarely anything in a spec file that would be a difficult conflict to
resolve. At work I often cherry pick
visibility(“default”) and so members are not exported from
the library
Michael
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, at 10:35 PM, Michael Cullen wrote:
> At a guess, and not having looked at the code or logs, I would say
> it’s either a virtual destructor defined in a header file (that can
> cause problems with t
ngs though I'm sometimes
getting 503 errors from that site right now, so you might need to
wait a while.
Thanks,
Michael
- Original message -
* From: Nicoleau Fabien To: Michael Cullen
Cc: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: Unresponsive Maintainer: eponyme (EDB package)
Date:
Hi,
I raised a ticket against EDB a while ago since it's quite out of date:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1502328
I also raised a PR to update the package, again with no response:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/edb/pull-request/1#commit_list
As per the unresponsive maintainer p
I can take ccache if no one else wants it
Michael / mich181189
On Wed, 25 Oct 2017, at 10:52 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 08:34:54AM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> > (Does a thing exist where I could search FAS users by real
> > name, BTW?)>
> I find it easiest
ains replacements for some of
them, using the dvbv5 API rather than the dvbv3 API these apps use.
Easiest thing might be to remove the function the IOCTL is for from
dst-utils.
In future we should probably consider encouraging users to move to newer
utils though.
Michael
On Tue, 24 Oct 2017, at 10:24
I have a PR up for edb - if i get chance I might take a look at a couple
of others on that list.
In in the case of edb it’s looking a lot like the maintainer is
unresponsive - probably like for many of the package on that list.
Thanks,
Michael
On Mon, 23 Oct 2017, at 08:56 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Can anyone give me a hint as to what happened here? Did the package
somehow get partially
created?https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/2269
Michael
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dev
Hi,
I stumbled upon EDB [1] the other day and it looks fairly close to what
I've been looking for for a while now. It seems the Fedora package is
about 5 years out of date so I submitted a PR [2] for it. There's also a
COPR build of that branch [3] in case anyone wants to try it. Finally,
there's
Thanks. Looks like the old one was already closed for being old.
New review is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476014
I'm happy to swap with someone.
Thanks,
Michael
On Thu, 27 Jul 2017, at 07:55 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>> "MC" =
Hi,
I noticed there's an old review for icemon [1] which I'd like to revive
- would it be better to create a new review ticket or take over the
existing one?
Thanks,
Michael
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311959
___
devel mailing lis
Hi,
I retired dissy on master the other day (since it depends on an old
unmaintained webkit version that will disappear in f27) and while pkgdb
shows the correct status of in all releases except devel, it seems to
have ended up in 24, 25 and 27 but not 26 according to
https://apps.fedoraproject.or
On Thu, 5 Jan 2017, at 04:28 PM, Christian Schaller wrote:
> While most desktop applications have migrated to 64 bit at this point
> there are
> still many that hasn't. Steam for instance is still 32-bit afaict. So
> doing a clean
> cutover like this feel a bit to drastic to me and I am not sure we
Hi!
I've just submitted a review request here
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332344
I'm a software developer from the UK currently living and working in
London on Linux-based set top box middleware. I've been a Linux user for
a long time, but never really offered much back. I've tri
17 matches
Mail list logo
