Re: exclude people from giving karma?

2014-02-23 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, Maybe they didn't have any issues? 2014-02-23 18:12 GMT+01:00 Reindl Harald : > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-2922/libreoffice-4.2.1.1-1.fc20?_csrf_token=a6a024f6e2d35ad3fb8666c1244e215a6aa2 > > how can people pretend "installation went smoothly, no issue detecte

Re: ecryptfs alternatives

2013-12-18 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2013/12/18 Kamil Paral > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:33:34PM +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > > > The beauty of ecryptfs is that I can encrypt one dir - not whole file > > > system. > > > > What's the concern with encrypting the whole filesystem?

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Final Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!

2013-12-13 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, Is there any netinstall image for this RC1? 2013/12/12 Andre Robatino > NOTE: The 32-bit Install DVD is over its size limit. > > As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Final Release Candidate 1 > (RC1) is now available for testing. Content information, including > changes, can be foun

Re: EPEL for RHEL7 Beta

2013-12-13 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2013/12/13 Reindl Harald > sorry for half off-topic but are there any plans to > have EPEL pakcages for RHEL7 public-beta or even > still available and i am too stupid to find them? > > the base repo is missing a lot of things like > * htop > * lynis > * rkhunter > * phpMyAdmin > * php-pecl-

Re: ecryptfs alternatives

2013-12-12 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2013/12/12 Bruno Wolff III > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 15:17:33 +, > "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:33:34PM +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote: >> >>> The beauty of ecryptfs is that I can encrypt one dir - not whole file

Re: ecryptfs alternatives

2013-12-11 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2013/12/11 Peter Lemenkov > 2013/12/11 Michał Piotrowski : > > Hi, > > > > I have read in RHEL 7 beta release notes that ecryptfs will be > deprecated in > > this release. The problem is that I've got a system on Fedora19 (which I > > want to move

ecryptfs alternatives

2013-12-11 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, I have read in RHEL 7 beta release notes that ecryptfs will be deprecated in this release. The problem is that I've got a system on Fedora19 (which I want to move to EL7 after release) with some encrypted data. I'm looking for realiable alternative to ecryptfs that will work on EL7 out of box

Re: Packages have "proxy" word.

2013-10-31 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, Renaming packages it is not user friendly thing because of few reasons: - there's some documentation/blog posts etc that use these names - this will break installation scripts - poeple who use these packages are familiar with these names What if your country also ban "proxies" word? 2013/11

Re: PostgreSQL 9.3 in Fedora 20?

2013-09-09 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2013/9/9 Pavel Raiskup > > I know that currently Fedora 20 is in feature freeze state. But Alpha > > version is still not released and PosgreSQL developers released new > latest > > and greates version > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/release-9-3.html with cool > > features. Ar

PostgreSQL 9.3 in Fedora 20?

2013-09-09 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, I know that currently Fedora 20 is in feature freeze state. But Alpha version is still not released and PosgreSQL developers released new latest and greates version http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/release-9-3.html with cool features. Are there chances to get this version for F20? --

Re: Fedora 19 - Feature PHP 5.5 done !

2013-06-20 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, Thank you very much! It's a great feature :) 2013/6/20 Remi Collet > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Php55 > > I just create the update to PHP 5.5.0 final. > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-5.5.0-1.fc19 > > Very very short before F19 release ! > > > Remi. > -- > devel

Re: Does -devel package name only indicate "C" development packages?

2013-05-18 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2013/5/18 Tomasz Torcz > On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 06:18:41AM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962081 > > > > I have a request to change the name of selinux-policy-devel to > > selinux-policy-

F18 systemd update broke varnish service?

2013-05-16 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, I noticed that varnish service doesn't work after systemd update to version 201-2 varnish.service - Varnish a high-perfomance HTTP accelerator Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/varnish.service; enabled) Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since czw 2013-05-16 23:12:50 CEST; 1min 2s

Re: Plan to drop php-pecl-apc from Fedora - Urgent review needed

2013-04-16 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2013/4/16 Remi Collet > Hi, > > PHP opcode cache is a very important feature for sites with large traffic. > > APC is mostly a dead project. > No stable release for php 5.4, lot of issues. > > Upstream move most of dev resources to new "Zend OPcache" which will be > the official opcode cache

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

2013-01-29 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2013/1/29 Vít Ondruch : > Dne 29.1.2013 14:56, Christopher Meng napsal(a): > >> >> Funny...I suggest that we can submit a changing desktop feature per >> release. >> >> Maybe this is the best solution. >> >> > > It might be nice extension to different wallpaper in every release ;) How about instal

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

2013-01-28 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2013/1/28 Michael Scherer : > Le lundi 28 janvier 2013 à 09:56 +0100, Michał Piotrowski a écrit : >> >> Maybe it should be something like "defaultless" desktop. Just install >> Gnome and display desktop ballot screen "Yes, we know that Gnome 3 >> su

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

2013-01-28 Thread Michał Piotrowski
ot;feature rich and customizable" / "based on the traditional desktop" / etc > and possibly sorted by popularity, i.e. number of downloads? > +1 > > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> 2013/1/28 Nikos Roussos

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

2013-01-28 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2013/1/28 Nikos Roussos > ** > On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 00:10 -0800, Dan Mashal wrote: > > > > On Monday, January 28, 2013, Nikos Roussos wrote: > > On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 14:53 +, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > The Gnome 3 interface is substantially different that the traditional > desktop > >

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Fedora Upgrade - using yum

2013-01-25 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2013/1/23 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" : > On 01/23/2013 10:55 PM, drago01 wrote: >> >> Supporting "none" is not an option. > > > Really suddenly not an option. > > We did that for a long time why is that suddenly not an option so please > enlighten me why that's not an option. > > Users are better

Re: what is the current state of ext4 metadata checksums in Fedora?

2013-01-23 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2013/1/23 Benjamin Lewis : [..] > I've been using it for a few months, and whilst it hasn't yet found any > corruption that would otherwise have been missed (which probably means > my drives are good!), it also hasn't been the cause of any. Good to hear. I think I'll try this feature when I buy ne

what is the current state of ext4 metadata checksums in Fedora?

2013-01-22 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, Ext4 metadata checksums feature was merged into Linux 3.6. Can I use it out of the box with Fedora kernel or is there some magic switch to enable it? Are there any plans to support it in e2fsprogs shipped in Fedora - backport or rebase to 1.43 version? Last but equally important - how stable

Re: F18 Samba4 feature - update from Samba3

2012-12-18 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2012/12/18 Simo Sorce : > On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 18:43 +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Samba3 configuration on my development server is fairly simple. Do I >> need to change something in the /etc/samba/smb.conf after update to >> Samba4? >> >&

F18 Samba4 feature - update from Samba3

2012-12-18 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, Samba3 configuration on my development server is fairly simple. Do I need to change something in the /etc/samba/smb.conf after update to Samba4? I don't see anything about migration here https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Samba4 so I assume that it will be trouble-free. Am I too big opti

Re: Rolling release model philosophy (was Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID)))

2012-11-02 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2012/11/3 Adam Williamson : > Note > that neither Red Hat nor Microsoft actually support major version > upgrades for their operating systems Just take a look at this - MS rocks here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPnehDhGa14 -- Best regards, Michal http://eventhorizon.pl/ https://getactiv

Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID))

2012-11-02 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, Do current anaconda problems will have an impact on preupgrade? -- Best regards, Michal http://eventhorizon.pl/ https://getactive.pl/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Update mongodb to 2.2.0 (latest release)

2012-10-08 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2012/10/8 Troy Dawson : > On 10/05/2012 04:43 PM, Troy Dawson wrote: >> Hello, >> I have updated mongodb from 2.0.7 to 2.2.0. >> It is currently going through the normal channels for rawhide and Fedora 18. >> >> 10gen has a very good track record for being backwards compatible. >> According to

Re: PostgreSQL 9.2 for F18?

2012-09-11 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2012/9/10 Tom Lane : > Bruno Wolff III writes: >> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:24:40 -0400, >>Tom Lane wrote: >>> PG 9.2 is now released, and F18 isn't beta yet. So I'd like to push it >>> into F18 --- will anyone help test? > >> Yeah! > >> I'll definitely do some testing. My personal web

Re: PostgreSQL 9.2 for F18?

2012-09-10 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2012/9/10 Bruno Wolff III : > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 17:58:32 +0200, > Michał Piotrowski wrote: >> >> >> I updated my test rawhide VM and now it's broken - it boots to target >> Basic System. > > > I think that depends on the version of systemd used

Re: PostgreSQL 9.2 for F18?

2012-09-10 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2012/9/10 Michał Piotrowski : > Hi, > > 2012/9/10 Tom Lane : >> Bruno Wolff III writes: >>>Michał Piotrowski wrote: >>>> Is there any chance that 9.2 will be available for F18? >> >>> I think for 9.1 Tom pushed it just before beta when a

Re: PostgreSQL 9.2 for F18?

2012-09-10 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2012/9/10 Tom Lane : > Bruno Wolff III writes: >> Michał Piotrowski wrote: >>> Is there any chance that 9.2 will be available for F18? > >> I think for 9.1 Tom pushed it just before beta when a few of us promised >> to do some testing pronmptly. > &

Re: Reverting tmp on tmpfs mis-feature

2012-08-22 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2012/8/22 DJ Delorie : > >> 2012/8/22 Richard W.M. Jones : >> > broken tmp on tmpfs >> >> Could you give a reason why you think so? > > Can we not repeat the VERY long thread on why this is/isn't a broken feature? Ah, ok, I'll read archived threads. > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedorap

Re: Reverting tmp on tmpfs mis-feature

2012-08-22 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2012/8/22 Richard W.M. Jones : > broken tmp on tmpfs Could you give a reason why you think so? > > Rich. > > -- > Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones > libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting, > bindings from many languag

PostgreSQL 9.2 for F18?

2012-08-20 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, I am aware that F18 is a special release - base for a new RHEL, so it is possible that you will not want to put there not yet released software. PostgreSQL 9.2 does not have any true revolutionary features, but it has quite a long list of improvements http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/stati

Re: HEADUP : change in PECL/PEAR packages - Fedora 18 ?

2012-08-19 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2012/8/19 Remi Collet : > Le 19/08/2012 14:12, Michał Piotrowski a écrit : >> Symfony 1.4.x pear package installs some data in this directory on >> Fedora/RHEL. > > I don't see this in the repository. > > The update won't delete the content, if any, of

Re: HEADUP : change in PECL/PEAR packages - Fedora 18 ?

2012-08-19 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2012/8/19 Remi Collet : > Le 19/08/2012 13:53, Michał Piotrowski a écrit : > >> Please provide link from /usr/share/pear/data to /usr/share/pear-data >> for compatibility reasons on already existing systems. It is not necessary >> for the new installations. > > Main

Re: HEADUP : change in PECL/PEAR packages - Fedora 18 ?

2012-08-19 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2012/8/19 Remi Collet : > Le 14/08/2012 13:36, Remi Collet a écrit : >> There still some unneeded stuff in /usr/share/pear > > I have just do the move > from/usr/share/pear/data > to /usr/share/pear-data Please provide link from /usr/share/pear/data to /usr/share/pear-data for compat

Re: 3.5 overheating - temperature increase of 83%?

2012-08-06 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2012/8/6 Thorsten Leemhuis : > Michał Piotrowski wrote on 06.08.2012 08:59: >> >> I noticed some strange sensors values on Linux 3.5 >> [...] >> Do anyone else noticed something like that? > > I'd say this post is off-topic here and this (and all further

3.5 overheating - temperature increase of 83%?

2012-08-05 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, I noticed some strange sensors values on Linux 3.5 3.4.6-2.fc17.x86_64 coretemp-isa- Adapter: ISA adapter Core 0: +42.0°C (crit = +90.0°C) Core 1: +49.0°C (crit = +90.0°C) 3.5.0-2.fc17.x86_64 coretemp-isa- Adapter: ISA adapter Core 0: +77.0°C (crit = +125.0°C

Re: F18 DNF and history

2012-06-22 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2012/6/22 Matej Cepl : > On 21/06/12 16:54, Michal Schmidt wrote: >> >> On 06/21/2012 04:27 PM, Nikola Pajkovsky wrote: >>> >>> Michal Schmidt writes: We do now. You can set clean_requirements_on_remove=1 in yum.conf >>> >>> >>> in which version that is supported? >> >> >> Since 3.2.28-1

Re: F18 DNF and history

2012-06-20 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2012/6/20 Nikola Pajkovsky : > Angus Salkeld writes: > >> On 19/06/12 10:51 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >>>On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 15:33 +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote: >>>> On 06/19/2012 02:44 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: >>>> > Hi,

Re: F18 DNF and history

2012-06-19 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2012/6/19 Ales Kozumplik : > On 06/19/2012 02:44 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I have a question about DNF https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNF >> >> Are there any plans to replace yum with dnf in the future? >> >> Acco

F18 DNF and history

2012-06-19 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, I have a question about DNF https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNF Are there any plans to replace yum with dnf in the future? According to what is written here https://github.com/akozumpl/dnf/wiki/Features-Considered-for-Dropping history function will likely be dropped. From my POV his

Re: F16->F17 preupgrade (Re: F17 Beta to slip by an additional week.)

2012-05-07 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2012/5/7 Michał Piotrowski : [..] > > It seems that the system so far is working well except for one small > thing - I can not log on to phpPgAdmin. I will have to review the > configuration to determine what caused the problem. > I think that in some way /etc/phpPgAdmin/con

Re: F16->F17 preupgrade (Re: F17 Beta to slip by an additional week.)

2012-05-07 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2012/5/2 Adam Williamson : [..] > So AIUI, you're saying preupgrade wasn't able to add an entry to grub1's > config for performing the upgrade? Exactly. > That could be filed as a bug, though > it probably wouldn't get high priority unless it also affects F15. Someone would have to verify i

Re: F16->F17 preupgrade (Re: F17 Beta to slip by an additional week.)

2012-04-28 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2012/4/28 Michał Piotrowski : > Hi, > > W dniu 28 kwietnia 2012 09:52 użytkownik Adam Williamson > napisał: >> On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 14:18 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 20:05:50 +0200, >>>    Michał Piotrowski wrote: >>>

Re: F16->F17 preupgrade (Re: F17 Beta to slip by an additional week.)

2012-04-28 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, W dniu 28 kwietnia 2012 09:52 użytkownik Adam Williamson napisał: > On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 14:18 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 20:05:50 +0200, >>    Michał Piotrowski wrote: >> > >> >Are there any serious known problem

Re: F16->F17 preupgrade (Re: F17 Beta to slip by an additional week.)

2012-04-26 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2012/4/26 Frank Murphy : > On 26/04/12 18:50, Michał Piotrowski wrote: >>> >>> >>> Is it possible to upgrade now from F16 to F17 with preupgrade? >>> >>> >> >> Has anyone tried to preupgrade from F16 to F17? Are there any problems >

F16->F17 preupgrade (Re: F17 Beta to slip by an additional week.)

2012-04-26 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, W dniu 9 kwietnia 2012 17:46 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski napisał: > Hi, > > 2012/4/5 Robyn Bergeron : >> At the Go/No-Go meeting it was decided to slip the Beta by an additional [..] >> * Blockers  (rbergeron, 15:16:41) > > > If I remember correctly, those were

Re: F17 Beta to slip by an additional week.

2012-04-09 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2012/4/5 Robyn Bergeron : > At the Go/No-Go meeting it was decided to slip the Beta by an additional > week[1]. Minutes follow below. > > Though the QA team was able to get through all validation testing, it was > found that preupgrade was not functioning at an acceptable level, thus > becomin

Re: SPDY in F18 (was Re: F17 httpd 2.4?)

2012-04-03 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, W dniu 28 marca 2012 19:39 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski napisał: > Hi, > > 2012/3/28 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn : >> On 03/27/2012 09:46 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: >>> W dniu 21 marca 2012 15:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski >>> napisał: >>>> 2012

Re: SPDY in F18 (was Re: F17 httpd 2.4?)

2012-04-03 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2012/3/29 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn : > On 03/28/2012 07:39 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: >> Hi, >> >> 2012/3/28 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn : >>> On 03/27/2012 09:46 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: >>>> W dniu 21 marca 2012 15:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski >

Re: SPDY in F18 (was Re: F17 httpd 2.4?)

2012-03-28 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2012/3/28 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn : > On 03/27/2012 09:46 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: >> W dniu 21 marca 2012 15:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski >> napisał: >>> 2012/3/21 Peter Robinson : >> [..] >>>> There's nothing stopping you from packaging

Re: SPDY in F18 (was Re: F17 httpd 2.4?)

2012-03-27 Thread Michał Piotrowski
W dniu 21 marca 2012 15:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski napisał: > 2012/3/21 Peter Robinson : [..] >> There's nothing stopping you from packaging up mod_spdy or any other >> modules that add support for the protocol. > > I will try tomorrow - I've got mod_fcgi

Re: httpd 2.4 is coming, RFC on module packaging draft

2012-03-27 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2012/3/27 Joe Orton : > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 03:09:08PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: >> Once upon a time, Nicolas Mailhot said: >> > The following is going to kill pretty much every packaged webapp unless >> > they >> > are changed now: >> > >> > https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/upgrading.html#a

Re: httpd 2.4 is coming, RFC on module packaging draft

2012-03-26 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2012/3/26 Nicolas Mailhot : > The following is going to kill pretty much every packaged webapp unless they > are changed now: > > https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/upgrading.html#access IMHO mod_access_compat should be enabled by default https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_access_compat.html

Re: httpd 2.4 is coming, RFC on module packaging draft

2012-03-23 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2012/3/23 Joe Orton : > httpd 2.4.1 packages are ready for dist-f18 and will be built early next > week.  Rebuilds will be required for all packages containing httpd > modules.  There are API changes in 2.4, so module packages may need > patches if upstream has not done that work already: > >

Re: Inconsistency detected by ld.so: ../sysdeps/x86_64/dl-machine.h: 460: elf_machine_rela_relative: Assertion `((reloc->r_info) & 0xffffffff) == 8' failed!

2012-03-23 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2012/3/23 Kevin Kofler : > Michał Piotrowski wrote: >> I tried to build mod_spdy and I hit this >> Inconsistency detected by ld.so: ../sysdeps/x86_64/dl-machine.h: 460: >> elf_machine_rela_relative: Assertion `((reloc->r_info) & 0x) >> == 8' faile

Re: Inconsistency detected by ld.so: ../sysdeps/x86_64/dl-machine.h: 460: elf_machine_rela_relative: Assertion `((reloc->r_info) & 0xffffffff) == 8' failed!

2012-03-22 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2012/3/22 John Reiser : >> I tried to build hello word >> >> #include >> >> int main(void) >> { >>     printf("test\n"); >> >>     return 0; >> } >> >> and it fails. > > You did not show the error message, nor the _exact_ command which > generated it.  Re-run with "gcc -v" so that we can see. > >

Re: Inconsistency detected by ld.so: ../sysdeps/x86_64/dl-machine.h: 460: elf_machine_rela_relative: Assertion `((reloc->r_info) & 0xffffffff) == 8' failed!

2012-03-22 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2012/3/22 John Reiser : >> Inconsistency detected by ld.so: ../sysdeps/x86_64/dl-machine.h: 460: >> elf_machine_rela_relative: Assertion `((reloc->r_info) & 0x) >> == 8' failed! > > Find the .o file which is being processed at the time of the complaint. .o file is not even generated [mich

Inconsistency detected by ld.so: ../sysdeps/x86_64/dl-machine.h: 460: elf_machine_rela_relative: Assertion `((reloc->r_info) & 0xffffffff) == 8' failed!

2012-03-22 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, I tried to build mod_spdy and I hit this Inconsistency detected by ld.so: ../sysdeps/x86_64/dl-machine.h: 460: elf_machine_rela_relative: Assertion `((reloc->r_info) & 0x) == 8' failed! I get this when I try to build even a simple hello world program. I checked RAM with memtest86+ (I

Re: SPDY in F18 (was Re: F17 httpd 2.4?)

2012-03-21 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2012/3/21 Peter Robinson : > 2012/3/13 Michał Piotrowski : >> 2012/2/21 Jon Ciesla : >>> 2012/2/21 Michał Piotrowski : >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Is there a chance to get httpd 2.4 in Fedora 17 >>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announce

Re: SPDY in F18 (was Re: F17 httpd 2.4?)

2012-03-21 Thread Michał Piotrowski
W dniu 13 marca 2012 21:59 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski napisał: > 2012/2/21 Jon Ciesla : >> 2012/2/21 Michał Piotrowski : >>> Hi, >>> >>> Is there a chance to get httpd 2.4 in Fedora 17 >>> http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.4.html >>

Re: /etc/default in Fedora

2012-03-19 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2012/3/19 Michael Cronenworth : > Michał Piotrowski wrote: >> >> Logwatch is great thing and I use it every day. But the problem is if >> you have multiple machines - you need to review a number of emails >> every day. So it seems to me that centralized log system wo

Re: /etc/default in Fedora

2012-03-19 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2012/3/19 Michael Cronenworth : > Daniel J Walsh wrote: >> >> We could put the info into systemd-journal. > > > Back when sendmail and logwatch were part of the default install, it would > have been nice to have SELinux activity reported in it. I still use logwatch > so it would still be useful for

Re: /etc/default in Fedora

2012-03-19 Thread Michał Piotrowski
W dniu 19 marca 2012 15:27 użytkownik Daniel J Walsh napisał: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 03/19/2012 10:16 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: >> W dniu 19 marca 2012 15:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski >> napisał: >>> 2012/3/19 Daniel J

Re: /etc/default in Fedora

2012-03-19 Thread Michał Piotrowski
W dniu 19 marca 2012 15:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski napisał: > 2012/3/19 Daniel J Walsh : >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 03/17/2012 11:25 PM, Dave Quigley wrote: >>> On 3/17/2012 7:17 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: On 03/17

Re: /etc/default in Fedora

2012-03-19 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2012/3/19 Daniel J Walsh : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 03/17/2012 11:25 PM, Dave Quigley wrote: >> On 3/17/2012 7:17 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: On 03/17/2012 05:38 AM, >> Matej Cepl wrote: > On 17.3.2012 10:18, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >> Here is the current httpd m

Re: Bug 803646- Password is visible on gnome-terminal

2012-03-16 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2012/3/16 Anish Patil : > > Hi, > > The description of the bug says " With English-typing-booster enabled on > gnome-terminal, while using su- command, password appears in the text". > English typing booster is IBUS-IME for english language. > > Any thoughts or comments regrading solution wil

Re: F16 problems with git

2012-03-14 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2012/3/14 Nikola Pajkovsky : > Michał Piotrowski writes: > >> Hi, >> >> I noticed recently a worrying git behavior. I often do something like that: >> git fsck --full >> git gc >> git push origin master | backup of the entire tree in tar archive >

SPDY in F18 (was Re: F17 httpd 2.4?)

2012-03-13 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2012/2/21 Jon Ciesla : > 2012/2/21 Michał Piotrowski : >> Hi, >> >> Is there a chance to get httpd 2.4 in Fedora 17 >> http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.4.html >> ? >> >> This is the first major release from a few years and has some nice fe

F16 problems with git

2012-03-13 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, I noticed recently a worrying git behavior. I often do something like that: git fsck --full git gc git push origin master | backup of the entire tree in tar archive 'git fsck' or 'git gc' sometimes causes damage to the repository ie: $ git fsck --full error: packed 694728b9fe62ad667f051a109c

Re: /etc/default in Fedora

2012-03-06 Thread Michał Piotrowski
W dniu 6 marca 2012 17:49 użytkownik Daniel J Walsh napisał: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 03/06/2012 11:38 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: >> 2012/3/6 Pádraig Brady : >>> On 03/06/2012 04:21 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >>>> On 03/05

Re: /etc/default in Fedora

2012-03-06 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2012/3/6 Pádraig Brady : > On 03/06/2012 04:21 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >> On 03/05/2012 03:20 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: >>> Hi, >> >>> I wanted to add "selinux=0" to the kernel command line on F17. I >>> checked /etc/sysconfig/, /etc/grub

Re: /etc/default in Fedora

2012-03-06 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2012/3/6 Paul Wouters : > On Tue, 6 Mar 2012, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > >>> Why /etc/default dir is used instead of /etc/sysconfig? To be >>> honest - it's not really user friendly from long time RH Linux user >>> POV. >>> >> Just disable SELinux in /etc/selinux/config. > > > Or the more obvious plac

Re: /etc/default in Fedora

2012-03-05 Thread Michał Piotrowski
W dniu 5 marca 2012 21:40 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski napisał: > 2012/3/5 Lars Seipel : >> On Monday 05 March 2012 21:20:12 Michał Piotrowski wrote: >>> Why /etc/default dir is used instead of /etc/sysconfig? To be honest - >>> it's not really user friendly

Re: /etc/default in Fedora

2012-03-05 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2012/3/5 Lars Seipel : > On Monday 05 March 2012 21:20:12 Michał Piotrowski wrote: >> Why /etc/default dir is used instead of /etc/sysconfig? To be honest - >> it's not really user friendly from long time RH Linux user POV. > > It's what upstream uses. See > http:

Re: /etc/default in Fedora

2012-03-05 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2012/3/5 Bill Nottingham : > Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) said: >> I wanted to add "selinux=0" to the kernel command line on F17. I >> checked /etc/sysconfig/, /etc/grub.d/, next I started to read >> /etc/grub.d/10_linux (this new grub2 is so

/etc/default in Fedora

2012-03-05 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, I wanted to add "selinux=0" to the kernel command line on F17. I checked /etc/sysconfig/, /etc/grub.d/, next I started to read /etc/grub.d/10_linux (this new grub2 is so user friendly..) and I found ${GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX}. So I grepped /etc for GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX. I found file: /etc/default/gru

Re: phoronix benchmarks ext4 vs. btrfs

2012-03-02 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2012/3/2 Neal Becker : > Be careful what you wish for.  btrfs is not a clear win on performance. More frightening benchmarks are shown here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FegjLbCnoBw This does not surprise me. Btrfs has more features than Ext4, so it may be slower. If anyone wants Btrfs as

Re: F16 Linux 3.1 soft lockups

2012-02-24 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, W dniu 20 lutego 2012 19:52 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski napisał: > 2012/2/20 Dave Jones : >> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 06:39:54PM +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote: >>  > Hi, >>  > >>  > W dniu 7 stycznia 2012 16:34 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski >>  &g

Re: F16 how to install "less" ruby gem?

2012-02-22 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2012/2/22 T.C. Hollingsworth : > 2012/2/22 Michał Piotrowski : >> I need lessc with --compress option to build bootstrap framework. I'm >> not sure if "less" gem is appropriate for this task, but I wanted to >> try it. > > The canonical version of les

Re: F16 how to install "less" ruby gem?

2012-02-22 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2012/2/21 Vít Ondruch : > Dne 21.2.2012 18:30, Michał Piotrowski napsal(a): > >> Hi, >> >> I want to install "less" gem. I switched to root account, and typed >> >> # gem install less >> Fetching: therubyracer-0.9.10.gem (100%) >

F17 httpd 2.4?

2012-02-21 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, Is there a chance to get httpd 2.4 in Fedora 17 http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.4.html ? This is the first major release from a few years and has some nice features. -- Best regards, Michal http://eventhorizon.pl/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://

F16 how to install "less" ruby gem?

2012-02-21 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, I want to install "less" gem. I switched to root account, and typed # gem install less Fetching: therubyracer-0.9.10.gem (100%) Building native extensions. This could take a while... ... And it's all - install process stops. When I check what is happening with ps I get ps -aux : root

Re: F16 Linux 3.1 soft lockups

2012-02-20 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2012/2/20 Dave Jones : > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 06:39:54PM +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote: >  > Hi, >  > >  > W dniu 7 stycznia 2012 16:34 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski >  > napisał: >  > > Hi, >  > > >  > > I've noticed some strang

Re: F16 Linux 3.1 soft lockups

2012-02-20 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, W dniu 7 stycznia 2012 16:34 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski napisał: > Hi, > > I've noticed some strange soft lockup behaviour on my system (please > see the attachment). Soft lockup appears to be caused by kswapd0 > process. It seems to me that in both cases this error o

glibc policy chage?

2012-02-06 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, I noticed that F17 is based on the latest stable glibc realease. Previously development Fedora version was based on development glibc. Was there a change of some Fedora glibc policy? If it is no coincidence, but the new policy - many thanks for the change :) -- Best regards, Michal http://e

Re: F17 proposal - prerelease version name changes

2012-01-25 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2012/1/25 Jos Vos : > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:01:07PM +0100, Swapnil Bhartiya wrote: > >> I don't think Fedora is for 'consumers'. Due to the policy to not >> include many non-free components and missing apps from main repos, I >> don't consider it a consumer OS. I tried it myself and also tried

Re: F17 proposal - prerelease version name changes

2012-01-25 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2012/1/25 Jos Vos : > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:22:37AM +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > >> Microsoft has changed the way of prerelease version naming >> Alpha -> Developer Preview >> Beta -> Consumer Preview >> Release Candidate -> Enterprise (or Busine

F17 proposal - prerelease version name changes

2012-01-25 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, Microsoft has changed the way of prerelease version naming Alpha -> Developer Preview Beta -> Consumer Preview Release Candidate -> Enterprise (or Business) Preview http://www.neowin.net/news/windows-8-beta-may-be-called-the-consumer-preview It seems to me that this is a very good change for

F17/rawhide uninstallable for 48 days?

2012-01-23 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, I want to install rawhide on one laptop. I tried to use TC1 netinst image (http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/17-Alpha.TC1/Fedora/x86_64/iso/Fedora-17-Alpha-x86_64-netinst.iso), but it fails on: ImportError: No module named errors I tried to use xfce live cd (http://koji.fedoraproject.

Re: F16 Linux 3.1 soft lockups

2012-01-07 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, I've noticed some strange soft lockup behaviour on my system (please see the attachment). Soft lockup appears to be caused by kswapd0 process. It seems to me that in both cases this error occured when I used "git fsck --full" or "git gc" commands. -- Best regards, Michal http://eventhorizon.

Re: MATE desktop environment (GNOME 2 fork)

2011-12-09 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, What do you think about Trinity Desktop? I liked KDE3. Is there a chance to include this DE in Fedora? Unlike the MATE, TD is well maintained and there is a development community. -- Best regards, Michal http://eventhorizon.pl/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://ad

F16 possible glibc 2.14.90-19 problems

2011-11-29 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, I've got 15 daemons writen in python that run php tasks. When I start all daemons I see a lot of segfaults in logs. [137969.485410] php[23201]: segfault at 50018 ip 005910d9 sp 7fff4160bd90 error 4 in php[40+2ca000] [138037.623654] php[23469]: segfault at bc072fa35 ip

Re: why do I need colord?

2011-11-08 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2011/11/8 Richard Hughes : > 2011/11/7 Michał Piotrowski : >> Out of curiosity I wanted to ask, why do I need colord on my system? > > Checkout http://www.freedesktop.org/software/colord/ for details about > the project. I know what colord is intended for and I think this

Re: why do I need colord?

2011-11-07 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2011/11/8 Kevin Kofler : > Michał Piotrowski wrote: >> Out of curiosity I wanted to ask, why do I need colord on my system? > > Try "yum remove colord" and see what it wants to remove (and probably say > "no" if it's anything important to you), then you&#

Re: why do I need colord?

2011-11-07 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2011/11/8 Stephen John Smoogen : > 2011/11/7 Michał Piotrowski : >> Hi, >> >> Out of curiosity I wanted to ask, why do I need colord on my system? >> >> My system is ordinary web developer box with php, python, postgresql, >> mysql, memcached, cherokee, htt

why do I need colord?

2011-11-07 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, Out of curiosity I wanted to ask, why do I need colord on my system? My system is ordinary web developer box with php, python, postgresql, mysql, memcached, cherokee, httpd etc. Colord was installed because of dependencies. But I would like to know why I need this package? My system worked wi

Re: F16 my network doesn't work after an update and I don't know how to fix it...

2011-10-26 Thread Michał Piotrowski
W dniu 26 października 2011 18:18 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski napisał: > Hi, > > Today I updated my F16 to latest version. After a while I noticed some > problems with network, I rebooted system and after this my network on > this box doesn't work anymore. Sorry for t

F16 my network doesn't work after an update and I don't know how to fix it...

2011-10-26 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, Today I updated my F16 to latest version. After a while I noticed some problems with network, I rebooted system and after this my network on this box doesn't work anymore. I use NetworkManager and dhcp. During the update NetworkManager and NetworkManager-glib was updated from 1:0.9.1.90-3.git

  1   2   3   4   5   >