some iptables rules to your
rc.local script.
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
without admin
intervention. Too much use cases.
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
t kind of user accounts are
not recognized by what software?
>
> This might not be restricted to servers: all audio-components are there
> to do some professional work: jack, pulseuaudio, alsa, Audacity,
> plugins, ... but I have to fiddle them together myself.
>
What?
Mateusz M
gt; (In old "network" service speak, the runtime operation would be:
>
> ifdown em1
> ifup bridge0_slave_1
>
> and we still expect these commands to work even when NetworkManager is
> managing the interface.)
> --
>
> Dan
>
I'm doing this differently
ast I checked),
>>
>> No it hasn't. Boot with parameter 'vnc'.
>
> Could someone please add them to the boot menu please? I've been
> searching for ages for those options and I didn't see it mentioned
> anywhere.
>
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US
ion
main:
.LFB0:
.cfi_startproc
pushq %rbp
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
.cfi_offset 6, -16
movq%rsp, %rbp
.cfi_def_cfa_register 6
movl$.LC0, %edi
callputs
movl $0, %eax
popq%rbp
.cfi_def
-R $NEW_HOST
> [ -n "$IP_ADDR" ] && NEW_HOST="$NEW_HOST,$IP_ADDR"
> ssh-keyscan $NEW_HOST >> $KNOWN_HOSTS
> ~~~~~~~
>
> Jeff
>
You can also manage host keys and fingerprints using FreeIPA.
kno
t;> as RPM if he is fine with the app-store, so you *could*
>> have both but i doubt at the end of the day it will happen
>
> And I disagree ... but there is a way to find out ... lets try and see ;)
>
After all there are other Linux distributions, so let's see if Fedora
survives this experiment. ;-)
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
e a better boat in the end.
>
>
I don't get your example but I agree with Reindl Harald - Linux
Distribution is a set of software that works as one coherent
environment. Let it be 10, 100 or 1000 different packages but
they're chosen, compiled and adjuste
r test environment with other unstable software and
don't need to destroy your workstation. If I were using Kate (to follow
your example) for my daily work I wouldn't risk making it unusable on my
system.
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject
xample, Django is
another. This two projects from very different corners are able to
provide stable API/ABI for some longer time period. I really appreciate
your (GNOME devels) hard work but sometimes it is better to stop and
think for a moment about where we're going, than writing as much code as
ike hammer - it's a tool. People don't care about hammers
unless they can build what they want. People don't want to install
software - they want to use it!
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 03.11.2013 20:25, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Mateusz Marzantowicz
>
> Do I understand correctly that first problem could be solved by
>
> stabilizing APIs used in various Linux projects? Because developers
> don't
On 03.11.2013 19:40, drago01 wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Mateusz Marzantowicz
> wrote:
>> On 03.11.2013 19:15, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:if success is
>>>
>
ts not pretend that commercial sucess doesn't matter as well. Fedora
> might be free for you but it is certainly not free for say Red Hat and
> their continued participation is dependent on Fedora being more
> successful as well. I for one, consider this a good thing.
>
Just
On 03.11.2013 15:10, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> We DON'T want Apple-like "apps"!
This is exactly what is going to happen with "Sandboxed applications for
GNOME" (GNOME, Fedora, Linux - whatever you want). Sadly this idea is
promoted and developed by some RH emp
On 01.11.2013 19:15, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Mateusz Marzantowicz
> wrote:
>> On 01.11.2013 15:24, Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller wrote:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>> Attached is the draft PRD for the Workstation working group. The
>>&g
Hat we will need to pull this
> off.
>
It looks like it is designed only for developers by developers.
What about graphic designers, musicians, document writers, etc.? They
all are not mentioned as target audience.
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.o
On 22.10.2013 13:32, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> On 10/22/2013 01:25 PM, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>> Are there any guidelines regarding user and group id number assignment
>> on Fedora?
>>
>> I'd like to add user/group for daemon, related to installed package, in
iscussions pointed there are from 2005.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageUserCreation
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Fedora Embedded? Do you plan to drop ARM support on Fedora? I
can't match small credit card size devices with either Workstation,
Server or Cloud group. Is this group list fixed or could be extended and
on what basis?
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedo
I've found this page [1] with following content:
- Targeted release: Fedora 16
- Last updated: 2011-06-27
- Percentage of completion: 10%
Is it OK to have feature which is 10% complete and is still targeted at
eol release?
Mateusz Marzantowicz
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fea
it means distro
devels screwed up releasing untested package. It's good to have all that
options around but presenting them to user just in case he might want to
do something more advanced once a year is simply wrong.
To educate new Linux/Fedora users, it's better to write some good
docu
On 20.09.2013 22:23, Björn Persson wrote:
>
> Anyone can broadcast an SSID. How does FirewallD authenticate the
> network connection?
>
FirewallD is not responsible for such authentication/AP validation.
Firewall as such is not meant to assure you're connecting to where yo
tuff by fast
> native code in systemd, why sabotage that effort by shoving a Python
> firewall down our throats?)
>
It's written in Python and so what? Interpreted languages like Perl and
Bash are widely used in Linux world to implement many tools. I don't buy
argumentation
On 17.09.2013 12:31, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
> Le Mar 17 septembre 2013 11:33, Björn Persson a écrit :
>> Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>>> Wireless networks have unique "names" and are represented as different
>>> connections on NetworkManager (network c
Public zone is as I
understand strictest but usable one (block zone does not allow traffic).
This can also be applied to wired connection.
The reason for all that chains is to allow adding/removing rules without
need to reload all of them. It's written somewhere on FirewallD's si
2. Why you say there is no way for firewall to know which app is
requesting specific port to be opened? There is a process name and path
and it could be identified. It's also easy to maintain database of most
commonly used binaries and ports that they'd like to open/close. If you
don't
I don't in
other distros. If something works in one version of F it should not
break in the next one.
> So there we have it. Comments and discussion, please!
>
I think it's one of the most reasonable proposals since decade that
occurred to Fedora.
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
g
features and APIs in their own programs? Please, enlighten me with some
(preferably official) resources e.g. about logging using journald in
C/C++ or Python/Perl.
Thanks in advance,
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma
ature
was so hot and finally landed in different file than it was initially
designed?
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
influenced
> by arguments made on the development list. Maybe that's just wishful
> thinking.
>
> Eric
I don't know how it goes with FESCO but once, there was a community
voice that was heard by developers about Anaconda not hiding password
characters during install
On 15.07.2013 23:49, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:38:14PM +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>> On 15.07.2013 23:06, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>> It's a matter of finding the right balance: i.e. what can be text
>>> files, and whe
understand why it's superior to text and also why
something more sophisticated isn't used if we really need this
additional meta data that could not be included in plain text?
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
ge some simple survey. Only one
question: do you know what is journalctl and what's it's purpose? If
more than 50% of users (sysadmins, developers and others) answers "yes",
than maybe it's time to switch. Six out of nine of my colleagues which
do server administ
On 17.06.2013 21:26, Dan Mashal wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Mateusz Marzantowicz
> wrote:
>> On 17.06.2013 17:18, Heiko Adams wrote:
>>
>> From my point of view the java-plugin is a big security hole and should be
>> kicked from default installations A
On 17.06.2013 17:18, Heiko Adams wrote:
> From my point of view the java-plugin is a big security hole and
> should be kicked from default installations ASAP.
>
>
>
Then, why not fix it?
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fe
on:
*
http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/40587/why-are-shared-libraries-executable
*
http://serverfault.com/questions/173853/why-shared-libraries-on-linux-are-executable
I can confirm that in Debian shared libs are not marked as executable
(most of them). Maybe Fedora/RHEL make use of some form of prot
usable as it was in F17
and now this "plain password" issue which fixes nothing occurred!
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
er Torvalds laughing at Windows software and its need of
rebooting and inability to remove opened file. Now Linux is going the
same direction. Reboot every time you upgrade text editor.
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
40 matches
Mail list logo
