Re: The behaviour of systemctl.

2011-06-19 Thread Martin Dengler
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 12:54:38PM +0200, Aaron Sowry wrote: > On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 10:03:05AM +0100, Martin Dengler wrote: > > Your point about column headers is taken (explicitly, in my mail) and > > bears no more repeating since there's a bug about it. > > I didn

Re: The behaviour of systemctl.

2011-06-19 Thread Martin Dengler
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 09:46:29AM +0200, Aaron Sowry wrote: > On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 10:25:53PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > Yes, but the difference here is that "ls" does not re-implement something > > > that > > > is already available at the command line. > > > > Hmm??? > > The for

Re: The behaviour of systemctl.

2011-06-19 Thread Martin Dengler
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 10:46:48AM +0200, Aaron Sowry wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 04:31:08PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > > The apps that I've seen where they do something special like paging the > > output by default, will not do that if the output is a non-active tty, > > such as a pipe.

Re: The behaviour of systemctl.

2011-06-17 Thread Martin Dengler
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:16:35PM +0200, Aaron Sowry wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to discuss the behaviour of systemctl. See RH bug 713567 > for context. To summarise: > > - 'systemctl --all' pages by default when the output is to tty. This > consumes 50-60+ lines of potentially bug-prone code,

Re: Orphaning my packages...

2011-05-23 Thread Martin Dengler
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 09:37:20AM -0400, Truch, Matthew wrote: > I need to orphan all of my packages. In most cases, it would be great if > someone (or more) could pick them up. Let me know if you'd like any of them > and I'll release them to you. > kst -- A data viewing program for KDE A great

Re: incompatible screen update

2011-02-08 Thread Martin Dengler
O n Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 03:33:08PM +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote: > On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 14:28 +0000, Martin Dengler wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 03:05:03PM +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote: > > > [Let's] not to try to enforce rules such as no user process left > > > aft

Re: incompatible screen update

2011-02-08 Thread Martin Dengler
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 03:05:03PM +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote: > [Let's] not to try to enforce rules such as no user process left > after logout blindly on all systems. Not that I disagree with your statement (I tend to agree) in general, but how is "screen is running but detached" morally equivalent

Re: Fixing the glibc adobe flash incompatibility

2010-11-18 Thread Martin Dengler
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 01:58:02PM -0500, Doug Ledford wrote: > - "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:29:56PM -0500, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > > > Most code is not performance critical. > > > > Much more code than you think is performance critical, particularly > > when