Why not Stratis?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fe
It's not a GPL violation. OpenZFS works under Linux through a compatibility
layer called SPL, the Solaris Porting Layer. SPL is licensed under GPL.
Torvalds himself said that a non-GPL file system that was written for another
OS cannot be considered a derivative of the Linux kernel:
https://yar
The legality FUD is unrelated to rolling or non-rolling kernels.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/proj
OpenZFS is frequently lagging behind in support for newer kernels which would
work against Fedora's "rolling" approach to kernel releases.
Proxmox and Ubuntu don't feature rolling kernel releases. That's why they can
ship OpenZFS (without legal problems, btw).
___
Wholeheartedly agree. Everybody who disagrees with your proposal better put
their money where their mouth is and do all necessary QA work for the upcoming
release!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to d
