On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 22:51 +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
(following up with more thoughts from the distutils-sig thread)
> It started here:
>
> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/distutils-sig/2013-February/020030.html
>
> and now we're talking about Software Collectio
Hey,
Just forwarding it here so Python folks don't miss it on the main devel
list.
Thanks,
Mark.
Forwarded Message
> From: Mark McLoughlin
> Reply-to: Mark McLoughlin
> To: Development discussions related to Fedora
>
> Subject: Python libraries and back
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 07:06 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 15:30 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > IMHO use of software collections is a symptom of a badly run organisation
> > not devoting enough cycles to maintain the software it uses, and hoping
> > (as in wishful thinking
On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 09:01 -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> Up to now the glusterfs and hekafs versions and releases have been the
> same for f16 and rawhide, i.e.: glusterfs-3.2.4-1.x86_64.fc16.rpm,
> glusterfs-3.2.4-1.x86_64.fc17.rpm, hekafs-0.7-16.x86_64.fc16.rpm, and
> hekafs-0.7-16.x86_64.
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 17:00 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 04:50:16PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 14:05 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > The grub maintainer is telling you that the way in which you're trying
> >
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 14:05 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:27:35AM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
>
> > Sigh. I was joking. Obviously, if maintainers went around inserting
> > Conflicts with other packages because they don't like how the other
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 15:54 -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
> On 09/21/2011 03:39 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 18:48 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >> Remember that the incompatibility isn't between libguestfs and the
> >> guest, it's bet
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 18:48 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 06:30:58PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 20:11 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > The grub package (as provided in Fedora) is not designed for that. This
> >
On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 20:11 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> The grub package (as provided in Fedora) is not designed for that. This
> would be a much easier discussion to have if you stopped describing
> things that are manifestly true as "not true". And while it is the case
> that grub *is* bin
