Re: How to handle non-free parts of a free software project

2013-11-17 Thread Manuel Faux
On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 00:25:17 +0100 Kevin Kofler wrote: > Manuel Faux wrote: > > I little bit more feedback would be welcome. > > > > You don't agree to give the option to manually download the file at > > all, or don't you agree with NOT packing the file >

Re: OSGi 5 Implementation

2013-11-17 Thread Manuel Faux
On Sun, 17 Nov 2013 07:58:48 -0500 Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > - Original Message - > > From: "Manuel Faux" > > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2013 2:40:25 PM > > Subject: Re: OSGi 5 Implementation > &

Re: OSGi 5 Implementation

2013-11-17 Thread Manuel Faux
On Sun, 17 Nov 2013 04:39:06 -0500 Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > - Original Message - > > From: "Manuel Faux" > > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2013 10:50:33 AM > > Subject: Re: OSGi 5 Implementation > &

Re: OSGi 5 Implementation

2013-11-17 Thread Manuel Faux
On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 02:46:51 -0500 Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > > > > I didn't see that Equinox satisfies the OSGi 5 part, since I didn't > > use this package anymore, as soon I recognized that NetBeans does > > not build with it. > > Is this still true? I know that jtulach(one of the netbean

Re: Copr

2013-11-14 Thread Manuel Faux
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 16:58:30 +0100 Miroslav Suchý wrote: > On 11/14/2013 02:43 PM, Manuel Faux wrote: > > I wanted to try out the copr-cli, but unfortunately without great > > success. I added my API key to ~/.config/api but copr-cli create > > always results in an er

Re: Copr

2013-11-14 Thread Manuel Faux
I wanted to try out the copr-cli, but unfortunately without great success. I added my API key to ~/.config/api but copr-cli create always results in an error, without an error message. Is it known that the cli does not work yet, or did I miss something to configure? Manuel On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 13:

Re: How to handle non-free parts of a free software project

2013-11-12 Thread Manuel Faux
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 10:25:16 +0100 drago01 wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Manuel Faux > wrote: > > > I little bit more feedback would be welcome. > > > > You don't agree to give the option to manually download the file at > > all, or don't

Re: How to handle non-free parts of a free software project

2013-11-12 Thread Manuel Faux
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 09:56:47 +0100 "punto...@libero.it" wrote: > Il 12/11/2013 08:37, Manuel Faux ha scritto: > > On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 08:11:12 +0100 > > Manuel Faux wrote: > > > >> On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 15:08:10 -0800 > >> Toshio Kuratomi wro

Re: How to handle non-free parts of a free software project

2013-11-11 Thread Manuel Faux
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 08:11:12 +0100 Manuel Faux wrote: > On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 15:08:10 -0800 > Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 12:22:16AM +0200, Elad Alfassa wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Manuel Faux > >

Re: How to handle non-free parts of a free software project

2013-11-11 Thread Manuel Faux
On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 15:08:10 -0800 Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 12:22:16AM +0200, Elad Alfassa wrote: > > > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Manuel Faux > > wrote: > > > > NetBeans 7.4 requires a file called jnlp-servlet.jar which

How to handle non-free parts of a free software project

2013-11-11 Thread Manuel Faux
NetBeans 7.4 requires a file called jnlp-servlet.jar which is part of the Oracle JDK and itself non-free licensed. The file is not required for building, but for specific functions of the software. More concrete, the file is required if "one wants to build a packaged war file of JNLP version of a

Re: OSGi 5 Implementation

2013-11-11 Thread Manuel Faux
s soon I recognized that NetBeans does not build with it. Manuel > > http://projects.eclipse.org/projects/rt.equinox > > Alexander Kurtakov > Red Hat Eclipse team > > - Original Message - > > From: "Manuel Faux" > > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.

Re: OSGi 5 Implementation

2013-11-11 Thread Manuel Faux
On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 12:02:07 +0100 "punto...@libero.it" wrote: > Il 11/11/2013 11:35, Manuel Faux ha scritto: > > On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:07:55 +0100 > > "punto...@libero.it" wrote: > > > >> Il 11/11/2013 10:53, Mikolaj Izdebski ha scritt

Re: OSGi 5 Implementation

2013-11-11 Thread Manuel Faux
On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:07:55 +0100 "punto...@libero.it" wrote: > Il 11/11/2013 10:53, Mikolaj Izdebski ha scritto: > > On 11/09/2013 03:25 PM, Manuel Faux wrote: > >> I'm trying to build NetBeans 7.4 under Fedora, which requires an > >> OSGi 5 specifi

Re: OSGi 5 Implementation

2013-11-09 Thread Manuel Faux
On Sat, 9 Nov 2013 23:04:17 +0100 "punto...@libero.it" wrote: > Il 09/11/2013 15:25, Manuel Faux ha scritto: > > I'm trying to build NetBeans 7.4 under Fedora, which requires an > > OSGi 5 specification. NetBeans originally ships the OSGi Alliance's >

OSGi 5 Implementation

2013-11-09 Thread Manuel Faux
I'm trying to build NetBeans 7.4 under Fedora, which requires an OSGi 5 specification. NetBeans originally ships the OSGi Alliance's specification, whose license is not compatible with Fedora, as far as I know (http://www.osgi.org/Download/Release5?info=nothanks). Is there any OSGi 5 implementatio

Maven tycho Plugin and Reproducible Version Qualifiers

2013-11-07 Thread Manuel Faux
I'm trying to create a package of a maven project. The project uses the tycho-packaging maven plugin with reproducible version qualifiers. I am not checking out the git repository of the project, but a tgz bundle. Therefore tycho cannot do any git operations and fails with the following error: [E

Re: Discontinued Packing of NetBeans IDE

2013-11-07 Thread Manuel Faux
On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 09:11:37 +0100 "punto...@libero.it" wrote: > Il 07/11/2013 08:27, Manuel Faux ha scritto: > > On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 18:38:38 + > > wrote: > > > >> Quoting Rahul Sundaram (2013-11-05 17:46:55) > >>> Hi > >>>

Re: Discontinued Packing of NetBeans IDE

2013-11-06 Thread Manuel Faux
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 18:38:38 + wrote: > Quoting Rahul Sundaram (2013-11-05 17:46:55) > > Hi > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Manuel Faux wrote: > > > > > Is it correct that the NetBeans IDE is currently not packed for > > &

Discontinued Packing of NetBeans IDE

2013-11-05 Thread Manuel Faux
Is it correct that the NetBeans IDE is currently not packed for Fedora? I checked the "netbeans" package, which was last built for fc17. Is there any technical or license reason for this or is just nobody packing it right now? --ManuelFaux -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org htt