Hi,
I orphaned libvtemm package. Currently Haïkel Guémar is a co-maintainer.
I advise against claiming the ownership of this package. It's old and
unmaintained. Nothing depends on it, AFAIK.
I assume that the package will be retired automatically at some point.
Cheers,
Krzesimir
___
Hi,
I'm the "upstream maintainer" of libvtemm. In quotes, because last change I
have made to the project was 8 years ago. It depends on an orphaned package
vte (which is based on gtk2). It's also a leaf package. I don't think it
makes sense to even orphan it.
I intend to retire the package within
On Feb 25, 2017 16:15, "Michael Catanzaro" wrote:
On Sat, 2017-02-25 at 07:57 +, Andrew Toskin wrote:
> > > * if the package includes *precompiled* gschema... remove it?
> >
> > No, because these don't exist (at least I don't think so). All
> > installed gschemas are compiled at once based on
2013/8/4 Lennart Poettering
> I noticed this:
>
> $ rpm -qf /usr/etc
> filesystem-3.2-12.fc19.x86_64
>
> $ repoquery --whatprovides '/usr/etc/*'
> mirall-common-0:1.3.0-1.fc19.x86_64
> mirall-common-0:1.3.0-1.fc19.i686
>
> Since when do we have /usr/etc, and what is it for?
>
> Maybe I am the onl
2013/1/26 Nathaniel McCallum
> Could someone apply this patch to rygel so at least we can get a
> successful build?
> http://git.gnome.org/browse/rygel/commit/?h=wip/new-gupnp-dlna&id=118af0f588879703e0dd7d01787897b5893032e0
>
>
That won't do. Gupnp-dlna 0.9.4 has to hit rawhide first. Then inste
2012/1/30 Orion Poplawski :
> On 01/30/2012 11:49 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
>>
>> On 01/30/2012 08:24 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>>
>>> I am getting the following error building paraview with gcc 4.7:
>>>
>>> In file included from
>>> /builddir/build/BUILD/ParaView-3.12.0/Qt/Core/pqAnimationScene.cx
2011/2/21 80 :
> As for /usr/share/devhelp/books, since a similar issue raised by
> gtk-doc, guidelines should allow us now to own
> /usr/share/devhelp/books since devhelp is an optional functionality.
>
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Conditional_dependencies
>> The directory
2011/2/21 80 :
> @krzesimir: thank you, if we settle to /usr/share/doc, then you should
> move devhelp index to /usr/share/devhelp/books.
I moved devhelp2 file to directory owned by gtk-doc because avoiding
dependency on devhelp application seemed sensible to me - it is not
necessary to read doxyg
]
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=libvtemm.git;a=blob;f=libvtemm.spec#l58
> best regards,
> H.
Hope this helps,
Krzesimir Nowak
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 10:38 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> If you need/use it and want to maintain it, you are free to do so. If
> the kernel team knows a better alternative that you should consider,
> then the package should be retired instead of just orphaned and an
> explanation about why it was reti
10 matches
Mail list logo
