On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 15:05:47 +
Jamie Nguyen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Having some trouble for this package review request:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877705
>
> It has been approved, but I can't set the fedora-cvs flag. This has
> worked in the past, but maybe something to do
g them later
> today (hopefully).
Given that f18 has 1.6, I believe the same update should be made on f18
as well.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 20:29:13 +0200
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 07/19/2012 07:01 PM, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> > Lol, as if that isn't enough, looks like they ship their own
> > version of GCC 4.6 as well in the repo...
>
> I don't know what Ubuntu has been doing so
This part worries me
>
> > But, and this needs to be noted, updating with this repo added
> > *will* replace
> > some core GNOME components with Unity-compatible versions.
Lol, as if that isn't enough, looks like they ship their own version of
GCC 4.6 as well in the repo...
y updates to it.
> >
> > Uhm, we have that. It is called RHEL
> >
> > Paul
> No money to buy. :-)
CentOS, Scientific Linux, ...?
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
one slipped under my radar. Fixed.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
Octave 3.6.0 was released yesterday, so I'm updating the rawhide branch
to 3.6.0. This causes an API bump, causing the need to rebuild all
octave related packages.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraprojec
FYI,
ARPACK 3.0, featuring a soname bump, has been built in rawhide. If it
becomes necessary, I'll build the update in released branches as well.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 22:06:44 +0100
Tomas Mraz wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 22:52 +0200, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:34:12 +0100
> > Tomas Mraz wrote:
> > > What about running a 'file' command on the stuff and if the output
> > >
the output
> contains 'text' then allow upload only with some kind of --force
> option?
And what about separately shipped license files, documentation and so
on?
Not a valid option.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 19:41:13 +
José Matos wrote:
> On 12/11/2011 06:46 PM, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> > ARPACK used to be a project at Rice University [1], but they
> > abandoned it many years ago. After that many projects (e.g. Octave
> > and Scilab) started bundling their
://forge.scilab.org/index.php/p/arpack-ng/
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
mber that some time ago the
soname was bumped but then returned, so I had to do two unneeded builds.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
bug.
> >
> > Does the upstream package segfault?
>
> Upstream's Makefile uses -O0 and doesn't appear to segfault (probably
> as a result).
>
> Paul.
.. but https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749455 it's shown
that the upstream makefile use
ile time versions are the same and aborts if they are not.
> Probably good to have all hdf5 users do a:
>
> Require: hdf5 = 1.8.8
.. so please just add an rpm macro in the hdf package, that handles
numbering automatically, so that we can just
Requires: hdf5 = %{hdf5ver}
in the related p
order to
> continue with the procedure.
I'm Gary's sponsor. I, too, have been trying to contact him for a long
time. As nothing has happened, I have revoked my sponsorship.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
just to let you know - I'm taking a two-week holiday starting
tomorrow, during which time I probably won't have internet access. So,
don't wonder why I'm not, e.g., attending anything in bugzilla.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.o
voikko
openoffice.org-voikko-3.1.2-3.fc15.x86_64
$ rpm -q --provides openoffice.org-voikko
voikko.so()(64bit)
voikko.so(UDK_3_0_0)(64bit)
openoffice.org-voikko = 3.1.2-3.fc15
openoffice.org-voikko(x86-64) = 3.1.2-3.fc15
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 14:25:16 -0400
Omair Majid wrote:
> On 08/23/2011 04:44 AM, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> > $ ant -lib %{_datadir}/icedtea-web/plugin.jar doc main
> > doesn't work, it still fails in the same error.
>
> There are two things that were causing problems. Th
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 13:05:21 -0400
Omair Majid wrote:
> On 08/17/2011 12:22 PM, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I tried to update Jmol to the latest release, when I ran once again
> > into
> >
> > error: package netscape.javascript does not exist
=jmol.spec;hb=HEAD
Does someone have a solution to this problem?
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
p phase. This was
on Fedora 15. My spec file is attached, maybe someone can get it to
build.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
# Git snapshot version
%global gitver 20326a5
# Version of system GCC
%global gccver 4.6
Name: path64-compiler
Version: 4.0.10
Rel
way of handling this
> please?
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:AutoProvidesAndRequiresFiltering#Arch-specific_extensions_to_scripting_languages
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
htt
against OpenSSL (and asking upstream
for a GPL license exception), or shipping a private copy of GnuTLS.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
rsion
> number?
>
> I would try something like:
>
> %global gccver %(gcc -dumpversion | sed "s/\.//g")
> %if %{gccver} >= 460
> foo here
> %endif
I'm guessing, too, that the issue has to do with strings vs numbers.
The above version also fails with "p
On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 20:05:12 +0300
Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On 07/30/2011 07:44 PM, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
>
> > Is there a way to check if the gcc version is sufficient with some
> > rpm macro?
>
> Do you actually need to have it as a macro? Often cases like this can
>
eck if the gcc version is sufficient with some rpm
macro?
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
ktop.
PS. Willing comaintainers are welcome.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
ronment is loaded the relevant
library paths are added to LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
They're not installed in system locations, since e.g. all MPI libraries
ship with libmpi.so, and there are many variants: OpenMPI, MPICH2,
MVAPICH, and so on.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht..
ary.
.. but on the other hand, the same logic applies in the opposite sense:
if something requires OpenMPI's libotf.so.0, also the truetype libotf
will satisfy the requirement. (Although openmpi apps typically link to
a half a dozen other openmpi libs as well).
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Proj
non-system directory,
applications that link against libotf will get an automatically
generated Requires: against it anyways.
Maybe OpenMPI upstream should be contacted and asked to rename their
libotf.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
use of the problem is probably that the files in question have
been compiled with a proprietary compiler.
Does anyone know what causes the error and how I can get around it?
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 09:39:13 +1000
Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 02:21:14AM +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> > However, given that the problematic package only appeared in Fedora
> > 10 and upgrade paths are guaranteed by Fedora policy only from
> > F(N-1)
ra policy only from F(N-1) to
F(N), I'd say that there's probably no need to fix this any more, since
any remaining installations haven't had updates for ages and upgrading
to a current release cleanly would require a clean reinstall anyway.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
j
_64: plain and sse2
The plain stands for the "atlas" package. I don't know what flags it
uses.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 11:54:10 +0100
Thomas Spura wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 12:42:08 +0200
> Jussi Lehtola wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > I wonder why I'm still getting nag mails about
> >
> > pokerth has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
>
ckage currently in the F-15 repo should be
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pokerth-0.8.3-4.fc15
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
> I have *no* idea.
Maybe you missed my former reply.
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 00:28:57 +0200
Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> I'd say there's something seriously wrong with your yum configuration
> or the rawhide mirror you've been using. There hasn't been a gcc-4.3.1
>
1
in Fedora for a couple of years.
Check that the rawhide yum configuration (package
fedora-release-rawhide) is installed, run
# yum clean all
and try again.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
hether
> rpm-builds dependency list will be changing as a result of this?
> Because if so we'll have to work through a round of build failures as
> things which used to be in the buildroot purely due to rpm-build might
> no longer be there. I'm thinking of perl in particular.
Server Response)
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
here should have been a heads up for this. It affects 100s of
> > packages.
+ 1
> It's being fixed; no rebuilds needed.
Fixed, in what sense? What about the packages that have already been
rebuilt?
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
ages such as
root-unuran will break on existing installs. Also they must be built
against the new version of unuran, and the new packages must be shipped
together in the updates repository. You will have to request rel-eng for
a buildroot override to do this.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora
latest LTSP for i386.
What JD probably meant is that the repo file does not work on 32-bit
(x86_32) Fedoras, since $basearch is still set as i386 for some releng
reason (IIRC this has been discussed on fedora-devel some while ago).
You should be able to fix the repo tree with a symlink by m
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 12:55 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/09/2010 03:41 AM, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> >
> > I started doing merge reviews in late 2008, so far I've finished 24 of
> > them and have 8 reviews currently still open. The biggest problem so far
> >
far I've finished 24 of
them and have 8 reviews currently still open. The biggest problem so far
has been the lack of maintainer interest, often nothing has happened
after my comments. For the major part a lot of BZ pings and mails to
package-ow...@fedoraproject.org has done the trick, but s
Maslanova - 1:1.4.2-3
+- Added BR: perl(version) to fix FTBFS.
+
+* Tue May 04 2010 Marcela Maslanova - 1:1.4.2-2
+- Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0
+
* Sun Dec 27 2009 Jussi Lehtola - 1:1.4.2-1
- Update to 1.4.2.
- Fix spelling in rpm version: 1.4.1 instead of previous 1.41.
--
Fedora Extra
to try or make comments
> > on them. (Might not meet package guidelines yet)
> >
>
> Create review requests, Cc: me on them and I'll help
> get them
> reviewed. T
Hi,
I haven't been doing local install mirror management in a long time and
I am trying to get rid of ownership of packages that I don't use myself.
Ownership of mrepo is free for the taking to anyone who is interested in
it.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
n package BuildRequiring numpy does not need to mean anything.
All of my packages on the list BuildRequires numpy simply because the
install scripts have a dummy check in them for checking that all
necessary runtime modules are installed.. so AFAIK nothing is compiled
against numpy.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedor
Hi,
I find myself busy at $DAYJOB, so I don't have the time necessary to
maintain xine-ui. I'm going to orphan the package (pkgdb didn't let me
do it just a while ago), so I'm asking for maintainers and comaintainer
candidates to request access to the relevant branches
gt; minutes. A whole system update takes more.
I've been upgrading my systems for a few years now with a simple yum
upgrade, i.e. install the new fedora-release package and run "yum
update".
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
e writer of that and maybe it's added there.
>
> [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MPI
Just create a proposal and send it to the FPC for discussion.
If the proposal goes through both in the FPC and FESCo, maybe the MPI
guidelines will finally be moved among th
Hi,
I was recently asked why there isn't an fftw-static.i386 on EPEL x86_64,
even though both fftw and fftw-devel are available in both 32- and
64-bits.
Is this a bug in the repo scripts, or an intentional feature..?
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraprojec
ording to yesterday's reply, the person really wants to create a second
> account. Whatever the full plan may be, so far it only creates confusion.
How convenient. I could review my own packages.. and take over Fedora!
*manic laughter*
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussil
d we don't need to specify --target.
(clip)
> Am I missing something here? This is causing GLib to build using slow
> fallbacks for atomic operations, and likely causes other problems as
> well.
I've had some problems as well with pcc where using %configure makes the
build process thi
perience. Often I just convert the files to PDF first with
ps2pdf or epstopdf - if a file doesn't seem to open launching another
terminal, converting the file to PDF and launching another evince
process to view it is quicker to display than the original process that
had been running all the time
articular functionality, it would be helpful if you stated what that
> functionality is.
As a heavy LaTeX user I would be really against dropping xdvi before
there is some other app that runs as fast. Evince very slow - xdvi shows
pages straight away, whereas evince often displays "Loading..
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 10:52 -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > - "Jussi Lehtola" wrote:
> > >
> > > So is --as-needed within the current default flags?
> >
> > As far as I know, no. The default will still be --no-as-needed.
>
> That's
e for the
> inter-dependencies in .la files.
So is --as-needed within the current default flags?
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 00:06 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> jussilehtola:BADSOURCE:agedu-r8768.tar.gz:agedu
The upstream agedu tarball is generated nightly, so the md5sum changes
the whole time. Should I take out the URL from the source line?
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussil
61 matches
Mail list logo
