Some days ago the version number for the f18-kernels was changed to
20x as in kernel-3.7.3-205.fc18. Is there a special reason for this?
Are the first 200 numbers reserved for something?
--joshua
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo
2012/10/28 Matthew Garrett
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 03:04:15AM +0100, Joshua C. wrote:
>
> > I see but is there a general switch do disable those even if secure boot
> is
> > set to enable in the uefi firmware?
>
> No. That's kind of the point.
>
> &g
2012/10/28 Kevin Kofler
> Joshua C. wrote:
> > Over the last months there have been many patches to the rawhide-kernel
> > and rawhide-grub2 packages that aim to make those compatible with the M$
> > requirements for secure boot. Those locked down many user space
> &
Over the last months there have been many patches to the rawhide-kernel and
rawhide-grub2 packages that aim to make those compatible with the M$
requirements for secure boot. Those locked down many user space
capabilities. However I still haven't seen any single "magic" switch that
can disable all
2012/10/15 Hans de Goede :
> Hi,
>
>
> On 10/15/2012 10:41 AM, Joshua C. wrote:
>>
>> 2012/10/15 Hans de Goede :
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/15/2012 09:23 AM, Joshua C. wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
2012/10/15 Hans de Goede :
> Hi,
>
>
> On 10/15/2012 09:23 AM, Joshua C. wrote:
>>
>> I have a broken fake raid on my machine (intel p67 chipset with one of
>> the disks missing) and when trying to install F17 yesterday (with
>> up-to-date respin done with pun
I have a broken fake raid on my machine (intel p67 chipset with one of
the disks missing) and when trying to install F17 yesterday (with
up-to-date respin done with pungi) I was greeted with the following
message "disk sdXXX has bios raid information and. blah. is
part of a broken raid, ign
2011/9/2 Michał Piotrowski :
> Hi,
>
> 2011/9/1 Joshua C. :
>> Can someone finally rebuild firefox 6.0.1 for fedora? The browser is a
>> critical part of everyone's system today and I really don't understand
>> why such software isn't updated when neede
Can someone finally rebuild firefox 6.0.1 for fedora? The browser is a
critical part of everyone's system today and I really don't understand
why such software isn't updated when needed to.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2011/7/21 Jiri Moskovcak :
> On 07/21/2011 07:32 PM, Joshua C. wrote:
>>
>> The nightly builds for f16 are broken for the last 4-5 days because of
>> the abrt and libreport packages and the error is:
>>
>> DEBUG util.py:247: Package abrt-plugin-bugzilla is
The nightly builds for f16 are broken for the last 4-5 days because of
the abrt and libreport packages and the error is:
DEBUG util.py:247: Package abrt-plugin-bugzilla is obsoleted by
libreport-plugin-bugzilla, but obsoleting package does not provide for
requirements
DEBUG util.py:247: Package
2011/7/6 Bruno Wolff III :
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 02:25:56 +0200,
> "Joshua C." wrote:
>> I've been testing with grub and found an interesting problem. When I
>> install the package
>> http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/grub/0.97/71.f
I've been testing with grub and found an interesting problem. When I
install the package
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/grub/0.97/71.fc15/x86_64/grub-0.97-71.fc15.x86_64.rpm
everything is fine and grub works as it should:
[root@localhost x86_64-redhat]# grub
Probing devices to guess BI
Can someone please apply this patch
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/mickflemm/01-fast-chan-switch-modparm
to the f15 kernel? It fixes an introduced regression with the 2.6.38
kernel https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34992. Thanks
--joshua
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.
2011/3/24 Kevin Kofler :
> drago01 wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Kevin Kofler
>> wrote:
>>> Adam Williamson wrote:
In the particular case of Firefox, this isn't a problem, as it just
gives you one giant static executable...so it's very easy to
'uninstall'. :)
>>>
>>>
2011/3/24 Pete Zaitcev :
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:36:33 -0400
> Genes MailLists wrote:
>> On 03/23/2011 07:58 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> > Jochen Schmitt wrote:
>
>> >> If you want to get firefox4 on Fedora 14 now, the only way is to use
>> >> the private firefox4 repository on
>
>> Or you can
2011/3/23 Jochen Schmitt :
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am 23.03.2011 22:35, schrieb Joshua C.:
>> fedora is known for offering the "latest and greates software" and
>> "being on the edge" etc. So I was just wondering if the
2011/3/23 Nathaniel McCallum :
> On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 16:41 -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:35:55PM +0100, Joshua C. wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > fedora is known for offering the "latest and greates software" and
>> >
Hi,
fedora is known for offering the "latest and greates software" and
"being on the edge" etc. So I was just wondering if the latest f14
will ever get the latest firefox 4.0?
Recompilation of the packages from f15 is not such a good option.
--jason
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproje
Is there any chance that we'll get the kernel-2.6.36.x on f14?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
20 matches
Mail list logo
